• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰初级保健中针对 2 型糖尿病风险降低的生活方式咨询:APHRODITE 研究在 0.5 年和 1.5 年后的结果。

Lifestyle counseling for type 2 diabetes risk reduction in Dutch primary care: results of the APHRODITE study after 0.5 and 1.5 years.

机构信息

University of Tilburg, Tilburg,the Netherlands.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):1919-25. doi: 10.2337/dc10-2293. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

DOI:10.2337/dc10-2293
PMID:21775759
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3161269/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE To study the overall effect of the Active Prevention in High-Risk Individuals of Diabetes Type 2 in and Around Eindhoven (APHRODITE) lifestyle intervention on type 2 diabetes risk reduction in Dutch primary care after 0.5 and 1.5 years and to evaluate the variability between general practices. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes (Finnish Diabetes Risk Score ≥13) were randomly assigned into an intervention group (n = 479) or a usual-care group (n = 446). Comparisons were made between study groups and between general practices regarding changes in clinical and lifestyle measures over 1.5 years. Participant, general practitioner, and nurse practitioner characteristics were compared between individuals who lost weight or maintained a stable weight and individuals who gained weight. RESULTS Both groups showed modest changes in glucose values, weight measures, physical activity, energy intake, and fiber intake. Differences between groups were significant only for total physical activity, saturated fat intake, and fiber intake. Differences between general practices were significant for BMI and 2-h glucose but not for energy intake and physical activity. In the intervention group, the nurse practitioners' mean years of work experience was significantly longer in individuals who were successful at losing weight or maintaining a stable weight compared with unsuccessful individuals. Furthermore, successful individuals more often had a partner. CONCLUSIONS Risk factors for type 2 diabetes could be significantly reduced by lifestyle counseling in Dutch primary care. The small differences in changes over time between the two study groups suggest that additional intervention effects are modest. In particular, the level of experience of the nurse practitioner and the availability of partner support seem to facilitate intervention success.

摘要

目的

研究在荷兰初级保健中,艾恩德霍芬高危 2 型糖尿病主动预防(APHRODITE)生活方式干预对降低 2 型糖尿病风险的总体效果,评估普通诊所之间的变异性。

研究设计和方法

将芬兰糖尿病风险评分(Finnish Diabetes Risk Score)≥13 的 2 型糖尿病高危个体随机分为干预组(n = 479)或常规护理组(n = 446)。比较两组在 1.5 年内临床和生活方式措施的变化,比较两组和两组之间的变化。比较体重减轻或体重稳定者与体重增加者的个体特征、全科医生和护士从业者特征。

结果

两组血糖值、体重测量值、体力活动、能量摄入和纤维摄入量均有适度变化。组间差异仅在总体力活动、饱和脂肪摄入和纤维摄入方面具有统计学意义。普通诊所之间的差异在 BMI 和 2 小时血糖方面显著,但在能量摄入和体力活动方面不显著。在干预组中,体重减轻或稳定的个体的护士从业者平均工作年限明显长于不成功的个体。此外,成功的个体更有可能有伴侣。

结论

荷兰初级保健中通过生活方式咨询可以显著降低 2 型糖尿病的风险因素。两组在随时间变化的差异较小,表明额外的干预效果适中。特别是,护士从业者的经验水平和伴侣支持的可用性似乎促进了干预的成功。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19f/3161269/6eddfcb177e2/1919fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19f/3161269/6eddfcb177e2/1919fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e19f/3161269/6eddfcb177e2/1919fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Lifestyle counseling for type 2 diabetes risk reduction in Dutch primary care: results of the APHRODITE study after 0.5 and 1.5 years.荷兰初级保健中针对 2 型糖尿病风险降低的生活方式咨询:APHRODITE 研究在 0.5 年和 1.5 年后的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Sep;34(9):1919-25. doi: 10.2337/dc10-2293. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
2
A lifestyle intervention to reduce Type 2 diabetes risk in Dutch primary care: 2.5-year results of a randomized controlled trial.生活方式干预降低荷兰初级保健 2 型糖尿病风险:一项随机对照试验的 2.5 年结果。
Diabet Med. 2012 Aug;29(8):e223-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2012.03648.x.
3
Implementation of a lifestyle intervention for type 2 diabetes prevention in Dutch primary care: opportunities for intervention delivery.在荷兰初级保健中实施 2 型糖尿病预防生活方式干预:干预提供机会。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Aug 8;13:79. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-79.
4
Sustained diabetes risk reduction after real life and primary health care setting implementation of the diabetes in Europe prevention using lifestyle, physical activity and nutritional intervention (DE-PLAN) project.在现实生活和初级卫生保健环境中实施欧洲糖尿病预防项目(DE-PLAN),采用生活方式、体育活动和营养干预后,糖尿病风险持续降低。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 15;17(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4104-3.
5
Lifestyle changes can be achieved through counseling and follow-up in first-degree relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes.通过对2型糖尿病患者一级亲属进行咨询和随访,可以实现生活方式的改变。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Jul;103(7):835-43. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8223(03)00378-x.
6
Determinants of weight outcomes in type 2 diabetes prevention intervention in primary health care setting (the DE-PLAN project).2 型糖尿病预防干预在基层医疗环境中的体重结局的决定因素(DE-PLAN 项目)。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jan 2;18(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4977-1.
7
An active strategy to identify individuals eligible for type 2 diabetes prevention by lifestyle intervention in Dutch primary care: the APHRODITE study.在荷兰初级保健中通过生活方式干预识别适合 2 型糖尿病预防的个体的积极策略:APHRODITE 研究。
Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27(3):312-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp100. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
8
Sustained reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes by lifestyle intervention: follow-up of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study.通过生活方式干预持续降低2型糖尿病发病率:芬兰糖尿病预防研究的随访
Lancet. 2006 Nov 11;368(9548):1673-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69701-8.
9
Predictors of long term weight loss maintenance in patients at high risk of type 2 diabetes participating in a lifestyle intervention program in primary health care: The DE-PLAN study.参与初级卫生保健生活方式干预计划的 2 型糖尿病高危患者长期体重维持的预测因素:DE-PLAN 研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 23;13(3):e0194589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194589. eCollection 2018.
10
Effectiveness of a brief theory-based health promotion intervention among adults at high risk of type 2 diabetes: One-year results from a randomised trial in a community setting.一项基于理论的简短健康促进干预措施对2型糖尿病高危成年人的有效性:社区环境中一项随机试验的一年结果。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2016 Apr;10(2):111-20. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Feedback From Self-Monitoring Devices on Lifestyle Changes in Workers with Diabetes: 3-Month Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial.自我监测设备反馈对糖尿病患者生活方式改变的影响:3个月随机对照试验性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 9;6(8):e23261. doi: 10.2196/23261.
2
Preventing type 2 diabetes, overweight and obesity in the Norwegian primary healthcare: a longitudinal design with 60 months follow-up results and a cross-sectional design with comparison of dropouts versus completers.在挪威初级保健中预防 2 型糖尿病、超重和肥胖:一项具有 60 个月随访结果的纵向设计和一项比较辍学者与完成者的横断面设计。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 9;12(3):e054841. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054841.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Lifestyle intervention for prevention of type 2 diabetes in primary health care: one-year follow-up of the Finnish National Diabetes Prevention Program (FIN-D2D).初级卫生保健中生活方式干预预防 2 型糖尿病:芬兰国家糖尿病预防计划(FIN-D2D)的一年随访结果。
Diabetes Care. 2010 Oct;33(10):2146-51. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0410. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
2
Implementation and effectiveness of the first community lifestyle intervention programme to prevent Type 2 diabetes in Greece. The DE-PLAN study.实施和评估首个社区生活方式干预项目以预防希腊 2 型糖尿病。DE-PLAN 研究。
Diabet Med. 2010 Apr;27(4):459-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02918.x.
3
The effect of a cluster-randomized controlled trial on lifestyle behaviors among families at risk for developing type 2 diabetes across Europe: the Feel4Diabetes-study.
一项在全欧洲 2 型糖尿病高危家庭中开展的群组随机对照试验对生活方式行为的影响:Feel4Diabetes 研究。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Jul 1;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01153-4.
4
Obtaining evidence base for the development of Feel4Diabetes intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes - a narrative literature review.为开发 Feel4Diabetes 干预措施以预防 2 型糖尿病获取证据基础 - 叙述性文献回顾。
BMC Endocr Disord. 2020 Mar 12;20(Suppl 1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12902-019-0468-y.
5
A food-based, low-energy, low-carbohydrate diet for people with type 2 diabetes in primary care: A randomized controlled feasibility trial.基于食物的、低能量、低碳水化合物饮食用于初级保健中的 2 型糖尿病患者:一项随机对照可行性试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Apr;22(4):512-520. doi: 10.1111/dom.13915. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
6
Social cognitive theory-based intervention to promote physical activity among prediabetic rural people: a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于社会认知理论的干预措施促进农村糖尿病前期人群身体活动:一项整群随机对照试验
Trials. 2019 Feb 4;20(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3220-z.
7
Weight management programmes: Re-analysis of a systematic review to identify pathways to effectiveness.体重管理项目:系统评价再分析以确定有效性途径。
Health Expect. 2018 Jun;21(3):574-584. doi: 10.1111/hex.12667. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
8
Preventing type 2 diabetes: systematic review of studies of cost-effectiveness of lifestyle programmes and metformin, with and without screening, for pre-diabetes.预防2型糖尿病:对生活方式干预计划和二甲双胍用于糖尿病前期(无论是否进行筛查)的成本效益研究的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 15;7(11):e017184. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017184.
9
Individuals at high risk for type 2 diabetes invited to a lifestyle program: characteristics of participants versus non-participants (the HUNT Study) and 24-month follow-up of participants (the VEND-RISK Study).被邀请参加生活方式项目的2型糖尿病高危个体:参与者与非参与者的特征(HUNT研究)以及参与者的24个月随访(VEND - RISK研究)
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2017 Jul 31;5(1):e000368. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2016-000368. eCollection 2017.
10
Doctor Referral of Overweight People to a Low-Energy Treatment (DROPLET) in primary care using total diet replacement products: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial.初级保健中使用全营养替代产品向超重人群转介低能量治疗(DROPLET):一项随机对照试验的方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 4;7(8):e016709. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016709.
A European evidence-based guideline for the prevention of type 2 diabetes.
欧洲 2 型糖尿病预防循证指南
Horm Metab Res. 2010 Apr;42 Suppl 1:S3-36. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1240928. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
4
An active strategy to identify individuals eligible for type 2 diabetes prevention by lifestyle intervention in Dutch primary care: the APHRODITE study.在荷兰初级保健中通过生活方式干预识别适合 2 型糖尿病预防的个体的积极策略:APHRODITE 研究。
Fam Pract. 2010 Jun;27(3):312-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmp100. Epub 2010 Jan 20.
5
International Diabetes Federation: An update of the evidence concerning the prevention of type 2 diabetes.国际糖尿病联合会:关于预防 2 型糖尿病的证据更新。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Feb;87(2):143-9. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.003. Epub 2009 Nov 12.
6
10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.糖尿病预防计划结果研究中糖尿病发病率和体重减轻的10年随访
Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1677-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61457-4. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
7
Prevention of diabetes self-management program (PREDIAS): effects on weight, metabolic risk factors, and behavioral outcomes.糖尿病自我管理预防项目(PREDIAS):对体重、代谢风险因素及行为结果的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul;32(7):1143-6. doi: 10.2337/dc08-2141. Epub 2009 Jun 9.
8
Type 2 diabetes prevention in the real world: three-year results of the GOAL lifestyle implementation trial.现实世界中的2型糖尿病预防:GOAL生活方式实施试验的三年结果
Diabetes Care. 2009 Aug;32(8):1418-20. doi: 10.2337/dc09-0039. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
9
Quality-based financial incentives in health care: can we improve quality by paying for it?医疗保健领域基于质量的经济激励措施:我们能否通过付费来提高质量?
Annu Rev Public Health. 2009;30:357-71. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100243.
10
Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program into the community. The DEPLOY Pilot Study.将糖尿病预防计划推广至社区。DEPLOY试点研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Oct;35(4):357-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.035.