• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

供者指定:美国未指定供者的种族和民族差异与他们首选的披露器官捐献意向的方法。

Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in US nondesignators' preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

Transpl Int. 2011 Oct;24(10):999-1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01301.x. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01301.x
PMID:21777299
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3168712/
Abstract

Little is known about racial/ethnic differences in preferred methods of disclosing deceased organ donation intentions among persons not previously designating their organ donation preferences publicly or the association of medical mistrust with preferences. We surveyed 307 United States (US) adults who had not yet designated their donation intentions via drivers' licenses or organ donor cards (nondesignators) to identify their preferred disclosure methods (personal discussions with family, physicians, or religious representatives or public registration via mail/telephone/computer, workplace, place of religious worship, or grocery store/bank/post office) and to assess the association of mistrust with preferences. In multivariable models, we assessed racial/ethnic differences in preferences and the influence of medical mistrust on preferences. Nondesignators most preferred discussions with physicians (65%) or family members (63%). After adjustment, African Americans (AAs) were more likely than Whites to prefer discussion with religious representatives. In contrast, AAs and Hispanics were less likely than Whites to prefer registration at a workplace or through mail/telephone/computer. Medical mistrust was common and associated with less willingness to disclose via several methods. Encouraging donation intention disclosure via discussions with physicians, family, and religious representatives and addressing medical mistrust could enhance strategies to improve nondesignators' donation rates.

摘要

关于未公开指定器官捐献偏好的人群中,不同种族/民族在选择披露已故器官捐献意向的方法上的差异,以及对医疗服务不信任与偏好之间的关联,我们知之甚少。我们调查了 307 名尚未通过驾照或器官捐献卡指定捐献意向的美国成年人(未指定者),以确定他们偏好的披露方法(与家人、医生或宗教代表进行个人讨论,或通过邮件/电话/计算机、工作场所、宗教场所、杂货店/银行/邮局进行公共登记),并评估对医疗服务不信任与偏好之间的关联。在多变量模型中,我们评估了偏好方面的种族/民族差异,以及对医疗服务不信任对偏好的影响。未指定者最倾向于与医生(65%)或家人(63%)进行讨论。调整后,非裔美国人(AA)比白人更倾向于与宗教代表讨论。相比之下,非裔美国人和西班牙裔比白人更不愿意在工作场所或通过邮件/电话/计算机进行登记。对医疗服务的不信任很常见,并且与通过几种方法披露意愿的意愿降低有关。通过与医生、家人和宗教代表进行讨论来鼓励披露捐献意向,并解决对医疗服务的不信任问题,可能会增强提高未指定者捐献率的策略。

相似文献

1
Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in US nondesignators' preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs.供者指定:美国未指定供者的种族和民族差异与他们首选的披露器官捐献意向的方法。
Transpl Int. 2011 Oct;24(10):999-1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01301.x. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
2
Measuring and explaining racial and ethnic differences in willingness to donate live kidneys in the United States.测量和解释美国人群体在活体肾脏捐赠意愿方面的种族和民族差异。
Clin Transplant. 2013 Sep-Oct;27(5):673-83. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12196. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Determinants of willingness to donate living related and cadaveric organs: identifying opportunities for intervention.活体亲属供体和尸体供体器官捐赠意愿的决定因素:确定干预机会
Transplantation. 2002 May 27;73(10):1683-91. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200205270-00029.
4
Understanding disparities in donor behavior: race and gender differences in willingness to donate blood and cadaveric organs.理解献血行为中的差异:种族和性别在献血及捐献尸体器官意愿上的不同
Med Care. 2002 Feb;40(2):85-95. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200202000-00003.
5
Factors Associated with Opting Out of an Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donor Registry: Differences and Similarities across Five Key Groups of Young Race/Ethnically Diverse Potential Donors in the United States.与选择退出无关造血干细胞捐献者登记相关的因素:美国五个关键年轻种族/族裔多样化潜在供者群体的差异和相似之处。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 May;30(5):512.e1-512.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2024.02.012. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
6
Differences in attitudes toward organ donation among African Americans and whites in the United States.美国非裔美国人和白人在器官捐赠态度上的差异。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2001 Oct;93(10):372-9.
7
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Attitudes, Perceptions, and Knowledge about Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Donation: A Study of Younger Newly Recruited Potential Donors.种族和民族差异对无关造血干细胞捐赠的态度、认知和知识的影响:对年轻新招募的潜在捐赠者的研究。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Jun;28(6):340.e1-340.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
8
Racial disparities in preferences and perceptions regarding organ donation.器官捐赠在偏好和认知方面的种族差异。
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Sep;21(9):995-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00516.x.
9
Factors Associated With Racial/Ethnic Group-Based Medical Mistrust and Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Participation and Vaccine Uptake in the US.与基于种族/民族的医疗不信任相关的因素,以及美国民众对 COVID-19 疫苗试验参与和疫苗接种的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111629. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11629.
10
An assessment of the effectiveness of the Mottep model for increasing donation rates and preventing the need for transplantation--adult findings: program years 1998 and 1999.Mottep模型提高捐赠率及避免移植需求有效性评估——成人研究结果:1998年和1999年项目年度
Semin Nephrol. 2001 Jul;21(4):419-28. doi: 10.1053/snep.2001.23778.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct and Indirect Effects of a Web-Based Educational and Communication Skills Intervention "Promotoras de Donación" to Increase Donor Designation in Latinx Communities: Evaluation Study.基于网络的教育和沟通技巧干预“Promotoras de Donación”对拉丁裔社区增加捐赠者指定的直接和间接影响:评估研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 10;25:e37140. doi: 10.2196/37140.
2
Destination Transplant: Protocol for a Parallel-group Randomized Trial of an Educational Intervention to Increase Kidney Transplant Among Black People on the Transplant Waiting List.目标移植:一项平行组随机试验的方案,该试验旨在进行教育干预,以增加移植等待名单上黑人的肾移植数量。
Transplant Direct. 2021 Mar 16;7(4):e683. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001136. eCollection 2021 Apr.
3
A Culturally Targeted eLearning Module on Organ Donation (Promotoras de Donación): Design and Development.一个关于器官捐赠的文化针对性电子学习模块(捐赠促进者):设计与开发。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jan 13;22(1):e15793. doi: 10.2196/15793.
4
Organ Donation Attitudes Among Individuals With Stage 5 Chronic Kidney Disease.5期慢性肾脏病患者对器官捐献的态度
Transplant Direct. 2018 Jul 25;4(8):e378. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000818. eCollection 2018 Aug.
5
Promoting deceased organ and tissue donation registration in family physician waiting rooms (RegisterNow-1 trial): study protocol for a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled registry.在家庭医生候诊室推广已故器官和组织捐赠登记(RegisterNow-1试验):一项实用的、阶梯式楔形、整群随机对照登记研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 21;18(1):610. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2333-5.
6
Effects of a Video on Organ Donation Consent Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.视频对基层医疗患者器官捐赠同意率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):832-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3630-5.
7
Measuring and explaining racial and ethnic differences in willingness to donate live kidneys in the United States.测量和解释美国人群体在活体肾脏捐赠意愿方面的种族和民族差异。
Clin Transplant. 2013 Sep-Oct;27(5):673-83. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12196. Epub 2013 Aug 1.

本文引用的文献

1
How African Americans express their intentions to be organ donors.非裔美国人如何表达他们成为器官捐赠者的意愿。
Prog Transplant. 2007 Dec;17(4):275-80. doi: 10.1177/152692480701700404.
2
African Americans' organ donor intentions: who has used which registration mode to express her or his intentions?非裔美国人的器官捐赠意愿:谁采用了哪种登记方式来表达其意愿?
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Jan-Feb;14(1):E7-E13. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000303420.83518.65.
3
Variability of brain death determination guidelines in leading US neurologic institutions.美国主要神经机构脑死亡判定指南的差异
Neurology. 2008 Jan 22;70(4):284-9. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000296278.59487.c2. Epub 2007 Dec 12.
4
Understanding the relationship between knowledge and African Americans' donation decision-making.理解知识与非裔美国人捐赠决策之间的关系。
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Feb;70(2):242-50. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.09.017. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
5
Perceived transparency and fairness of the organ allocation system and willingness to donate organs: a national study.器官分配系统的感知透明度与公平性以及器官捐赠意愿:一项全国性研究。
Am J Transplant. 2007 Jul;7(7):1778-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01848.x. Epub 2007 May 25.
6
The reasons families donate organs for transplantation: implications for policy and practice.家庭捐赠器官用于移植的原因:对政策和实践的影响。
J Trauma. 2007 Apr;62(4):969-78. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000205220.24003.51.
7
Public attitudes toward incentives for organ donation: a national study of different racial/ethnic and income groups.公众对器官捐赠激励措施的态度:不同种族/族裔和收入群体的全国性研究。
Am J Transplant. 2006 Nov;6(11):2774-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01532.x. Epub 2006 Sep 4.
8
Organ donor registration preferences among Hispanic populations: which modes of registration have the greatest promise?西班牙裔人群中的器官捐献登记偏好:哪种登记方式最具前景?
Health Educ Behav. 2005 Apr;32(2):242-52. doi: 10.1177/1090198104272251.
9
Death and organ procurement: public beliefs and attitudes.死亡与器官获取:公众的信念与态度
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2004 Sep;14(3):217-34. doi: 10.1353/ken.2004.0034.
10
First person consent: OPOs across the country are adapting to the change.第一人称同意:全国各地的器官获取组织正在适应这一变化。
UNOS Update. 2002 Sep-Oct:1, 3.