Suppr超能文献

视频对基层医疗患者器官捐赠同意率的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effects of a Video on Organ Donation Consent Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Thornton J Daryl, Sullivan Catherine, Albert Jeffrey M, Cedeño Maria, Patrick Bridget, Pencak Julie, Wong Kristine A, Allen Margaret D, Kimble Linda, Mekesa Heather, Bowen Gordon, Sehgal Ashwini R

机构信息

Center for Reducing Health Disparities, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Rammelkamp R209A, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, MetroHealth Campus of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):832-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3630-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low organ donation rates remain a major barrier to organ transplantation.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine the effect of a video and patient cueing on organ donation consent among patients meeting with their primary care provider.

DESIGN

This was a randomized controlled trial between February 2013 and May 2014.

SETTING

The waiting rooms of 18 primary care clinics of a medical system in Cuyahoga County, Ohio.

PATIENTS

The study included 915 patients over 15.5 years of age who had not previously consented to organ donation.

INTERVENTIONS

Just prior to their clinical encounter, intervention patients (n = 456) watched a 5-minute organ donation video on iPads and then choose a question regarding organ donation to ask their provider. Control patients (n = 459) visited their provider per usual routine.

MAIN MEASURES

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who consented for organ donation. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who discussed organ donation with their provider and the proportion who were satisfied with the time spent with their provider during the clinical encounter.

KEY RESULTS

Intervention patients were more likely than control patients to consent to donate organs (22 % vs. 15 %, OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.10-2.13). Intervention patients were also more likely to have donation discussions with their provider (77 % vs. 18 %, OR 15.1, 95%CI 11.1-20.6). Intervention and control patients were similarly satisfied with the time they spent with their provider (83 % vs. 86 %, OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.61-1.25).

LIMITATION

How the observed increases in organ donation consent might translate into a greater organ supply is unclear.

CONCLUSION

Watching a brief video regarding organ donation and being cued to ask a primary care provider a question about donation resulted in more organ donation discussions and an increase in organ donation consent. Satisfaction with the time spent during the clinical encounter was not affected.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01697137.

摘要

背景

器官捐献率低仍然是器官移植的主要障碍。

目的

我们旨在确定视频和患者提示对与初级保健提供者会面的患者器官捐献同意率的影响。

设计

这是一项2013年2月至2014年5月间的随机对照试验。

地点

俄亥俄州凯霍加县一个医疗系统的18家初级保健诊所的候诊室。

患者

该研究纳入了915名年龄超过15.5岁且此前未同意器官捐献的患者。

干预措施

在临床就诊前,干预组患者(n = 456)在iPad上观看一段5分钟的器官捐献视频,然后选择一个关于器官捐献的问题询问其提供者。对照组患者(n = 459)按常规流程就诊。

主要测量指标

主要结局是同意器官捐献的患者比例。次要结局包括与提供者讨论器官捐献的患者比例以及对临床就诊期间与提供者相处时间感到满意的患者比例。

关键结果

干预组患者比对照组患者更有可能同意捐献器官(22%对15%,OR 1.50,95%CI 1.10 - 2.13)。干预组患者也更有可能与提供者进行捐献讨论(77%对18%,OR 15.1,95%CI 11.1 - 20.6)。干预组和对照组患者对与提供者相处时间的满意度相似(83%对86%,OR 0.87,95%CI 0.61 - 1.25)。

局限性

观察到的器官捐献同意率的增加如何转化为更多的器官供应尚不清楚。

结论

观看一段关于器官捐献的简短视频并被提示向初级保健提供者询问一个关于捐献的问题,导致了更多的器官捐献讨论并提高了器官捐献同意率。对临床就诊期间所花费时间的满意度未受影响。

试验注册

clinicaltrials.gov标识符:NCT01697137。

相似文献

1
Effects of a Video on Organ Donation Consent Among Primary Care Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Aug;31(8):832-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3630-5.
2
Effect of an iPod video intervention on consent to donate organs: a randomized trial.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):483-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00004.
4
Organ donation video messaging in motor vehicle offices: results of a randomized trial.
Prog Transplant. 2015 Dec;25(4):332-8. doi: 10.7182/pit2015166.
9
The process of organ donation and its effect on consent.
Clin Transplant. 2001 Feb;15(1):39-47. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-0012.2001.150107.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Organ Donation for Research Biobanking Among Historically Marginalized Racial and Ethnic Groups: A Systematic Review.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2512133. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.12133.
2
Interventions for increasing solid organ donor registration.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 4;4(4):CD10829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010829.pub2.
3
A Randomized Intervention to Assess the Effectiveness of an Educational Video on Organ Donation Intent.
Kidney360. 2021 Jul 28;2(10):1625-1632. doi: 10.34067/KID.0001392021. eCollection 2021 Oct 28.
5
Targeting versus Tailoring Educational Videos for Encouraging Deceased Organ Donor Registration in Black-Owned Barbershops.
J Health Commun. 2022 Jan 2;27(1):37-48. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2022.2035021. Epub 2022 Feb 16.
6
A Randomized Trial of Theory-Informed Appeals for Organ Donor Registration Using Internet Advertisements.
Kidney Int Rep. 2020 Sep 12;5(12):2238-2245. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2020.09.013. eCollection 2020 Dec.
9
Research protocol: general practice organ donation intervention-a feasibility study (GPOD).
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2018 Nov 12;4:171. doi: 10.1186/s40814-018-0362-9. eCollection 2018.
10
A quantitative appraisal of African Americans' decisions to become registered organ donors at the driver's license office.
Clin Transplant. 2018 Oct;32(10):e13402. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13402. Epub 2018 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship Between Verified Organ Donor Designation and Patient Demographic and Medical Characteristics.
Am J Transplant. 2016 Apr;16(4):1294-7. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13608. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
3
Approaching families on the subject of organ donation: a phenomenological study of the experience of healthcare professionals.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013 Aug;29(4):202-11. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
4
Communication and consent: discussion and organ donation decisions for self and family.
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jan-Feb;45(1):10-2. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.10.021.
5
Family physicians' role in discussing organ donation with patients and the public.
Virtual Mentor. 2012 Mar 1;14(3):194-200. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.3.ecas3-1203.
7
Effect of an iPod video intervention on consent to donate organs: a randomized trial.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Apr 3;156(7):483-90. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-7-201204030-00004.
8
American College of Physicians Ethics Manual: sixth edition.
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jan 3;156(1 Pt 2):73-104. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-1-201201031-00001.
9
Factors that influence the decision to be an organ donor: a systematic review of the qualitative literature.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012 Jun;27(6):2526-33. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr683. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
10
Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in US nondesignators' preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs.
Transpl Int. 2011 Oct;24(10):999-1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01301.x. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验