Suppr超能文献

测量腕部损伤后的结果:患者自评腕部评估(PRWE-Swe)瑞典语版本的翻译与验证。

Measuring outcome after wrist injury: translation and validation of the Swedish version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE-Swe).

机构信息

Department of Clinical Science and Education, Orthopeadics Section, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Jul 22;12:171. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-171.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a need for outcome measurement instruments for evaluation of disability after trauma. The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) is a self-administered region-specific outcome measuring instrument developed for use in evaluating disability and pain of the wrist. The aim of this study is to translate and to cross-culturally adapt the PRWE for use in a Swedish patient population. Moreover, we aim at investigating the PRWE in terms of validity, reliability and responsiveness.

METHODS

We performed a translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the PRWE to Swedish (PRWE-Swe), utilising the process recommended by the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons. A total of 124 patients with an injury to the wrist were included in the study. They filled in the PRWE and the DASH questionnaires at two separate occasions.

RESULTS

Reliability of the PRWE in terms of internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.97) and test-retest stability (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.93) were excellent. Face validity and content validity were judged as good. Criterion validity assessed as the correlation between the PRWE and the DASH was also good (Spearman's rho = 0.9). Responsiveness measured by the standardized response mean (SRM) was good with an SRMPRWE of 1.29.

CONCLUSION

This Swedish version of the PRWE is a short and easily understood self-administered questionnaire with good validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Our results confirm that the PRWE is a valuable tool in evaluating the results after treatment of a wrist injury.

摘要

背景

需要有用于评估创伤后残疾的结果测量工具。患者腕部评估(PRWE)是一种自我管理的特定区域的结果测量工具,用于评估腕部的残疾和疼痛。本研究的目的是将 PRWE 翻译成瑞典语并进行跨文化适应性调整,以便在瑞典患者人群中使用。此外,我们还旨在调查 PRWE 在有效性、可靠性和反应性方面的表现。

方法

我们按照美国骨科协会推荐的流程对 PRWE 进行了翻译和跨文化适应性调整,形成了瑞典语版 PRWE(PRWE-Swe)。共有 124 名腕部受伤的患者参与了本研究。他们在两次不同的就诊时填写了 PRWE 和 DASH 问卷。

结果

PRWE 在内部一致性方面(Cronbach's alpha 0.97)和重测稳定性方面(组内相关系数 0.93)的可靠性非常好。表面有效性和内容有效性被评为良好。作为标准相关性评估的 PRWE 与 DASH 之间的相关性也很好(Spearman's rho = 0.9)。以标准化反应均值(SRM)衡量的反应性良好,SRMPRWE 为 1.29。

结论

瑞典语版 PRWE 是一种简短且易于理解的自我管理问卷,具有良好的有效性、可靠性和反应性。我们的结果证实 PRWE 是评估腕部损伤治疗结果的一种有价值的工具。

相似文献

3
Evaluation of the Korean version of the patient-rated wrist evaluation.
J Hand Ther. 2013 Jul-Sep;26(3):238-43; quiz 244. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2013.01.003. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
5
Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Japanese version of the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation.
J Orthop Sci. 2010 Jul;15(4):509-17. doi: 10.1007/s00776-010-1477-x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
7
Validity and reliability of the Turkish "Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation" questionnaire.
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(2):120-5. doi: 10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0208.

引用本文的文献

1
The Volar Central Approach for Distal Radius Fracture: A Prospective Nerve Conduction Study of 38 Patients.
Hand (N Y). 2025 Sep 7:15589447251366459. doi: 10.1177/15589447251366459.
4
Long-term outcome for patients with distal radius fractures treated with volar locking plates versus percutaneous wires.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 12;19(11):e0307763. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307763. eCollection 2024.
5
CT-Based Micromotion Analysis After Locking Plate Fixation of AO Type C Distal Radius Fractures.
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Nov 3;57(12):2031-2039. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-01020-3. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Development and Validation of a Survey to Measure Patients' Expectations of Wrist Arthritis Surgery.
J Wrist Surg. 2022 Dec 8;12(4):337-344. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1759524. eCollection 2023 Aug.
7
Pulp-to-palm distance after plate fixation of a distal radius fracture corresponds to functional outcome.
Arch Physiother. 2023 Mar 20;13(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40945-023-00159-4.
9
Functional outcome measures for distal radius fractures: A systematic review.
Hong Kong J Occup Ther. 2022 Dec;35(2):115-124. doi: 10.1177/15691861221114264. Epub 2022 Aug 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Shoulder pain and functional consequences: does it differ when it is at dominant side or not?
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2009;22(4):223-5. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2009-0240.
2
A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Dec 18;10:161. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-161.
5
Outcome evaluation measures for wrist and hand: which one to choose?
Int Orthop. 2008 Feb;32(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s00264-007-0368-z. Epub 2007 May 30.
6
Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 May;87(5):1038-46. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02060.
7
Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review.
Injury. 2005 Apr;36(4):468-76. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.06.014.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验