Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, CA 94301-2302, USA.
Eur J Pain. 2011 Nov;15(10):1087.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2011.06.012. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
Under-treatment of pain is a worldwide problem. We examine how often pain was addressed and the factors that influence how much time was spent on treating pain. We analyzed 385 videotapes of routine office visits in several primary care practices in the Southwest and Midwest regions of the United States. We coded the visit contents and the time spent on pain and other topics. Logistic regression and survival analyses examined the effects of time constraint, physician's supportiveness, patient's health, and demographic concordance. We found that discussion of pain occurred in 48% of visits. A median of 2.3 min was spent on addressing pain. The level of pain, physician's supportiveness, and gender concordance were significantly associated with the odds of having a pain discussion. Time constraints and racial concordance significantly influenced the length of discussion. We conclude that despite repeated calls for addressing under-treatment for pain, only a limited amount of time is used to address pain among elderly patients. This phenomenon could contribute to the under-treatment of pain.
疼痛治疗不足是一个全球性问题。我们研究了疼痛治疗的频率以及影响疼痛治疗时间的因素。我们分析了美国西南部和中西部几个初级保健诊所的 385 段常规门诊录像。我们对就诊内容和治疗疼痛及其他话题所花费的时间进行了编码。逻辑回归和生存分析考察了时间限制、医生的支持性、患者的健康状况和人口统计学一致性的影响。我们发现,疼痛讨论发生在 48%的就诊中。平均有 2.3 分钟用于治疗疼痛。疼痛程度、医生的支持性和性别一致性与疼痛讨论的可能性显著相关。时间限制和种族一致性显著影响讨论的长度。我们的结论是,尽管一再呼吁解决疼痛治疗不足的问题,但在老年患者中,用于治疗疼痛的时间有限。这种现象可能导致疼痛治疗不足。