Cognitive Science/Cognitive Brain Research Unit, Institute of Behavioural Sciences, University of Helsinki Helsinki, Finland.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2013 Aug 20;7:41. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2013.00041. eCollection 2013.
Emotional stimuli are preferentially processed over neutral stimuli. Previous studies, however, disagree on whether emotional stimuli capture attention preattentively or whether the processing advantage is dependent on allocation of attention. The present study investigated attention and emotion processes by measuring brain responses related to eye movement events while 11 participants viewed images selected from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). Brain responses to emotional stimuli were compared between serial and parallel presentation. An "emotional" set included one image with high positive or negative valence among neutral images. A "neutral" set comprised four neutral images. The participants were asked to indicate which picture-if any-was emotional and to rate that picture on valence and arousal. In the serial condition, the event-related potentials (ERPs) were time-locked to the stimulus onset. In the parallel condition, the ERPs were time-locked to the first eye entry on an image. The eye movement results showed facilitated processing of emotional, especially unpleasant information. The EEG results in both presentation conditions showed that the LPP ("late positive potential") amplitudes at 400-500 ms were enlarged for the unpleasant and pleasant pictures as compared to neutral pictures. Moreover, the unpleasant scenes elicited stronger responses than pleasant scenes. The ERP results did not support parafoveal emotional processing, although the eye movement results suggested faster attention capture by emotional stimuli. Our findings, thus, suggested that emotional processing depends on overt attentional resources engaged in the processing of emotional content. The results also indicate that brain responses to emotional images can be analyzed time-locked to eye movement events, although the response amplitudes were larger during serial presentation.
情绪刺激优先于中性刺激被加工。然而,之前的研究对于情绪刺激是否是自动地捕获注意力,还是注意力的分配决定了其加工优势存在分歧。本研究通过测量 11 名参与者观看选自国际情感图片系统(IAPS)的图片时与眼球运动事件相关的大脑反应,研究了注意和情绪过程。通过串行和并行呈现来比较情绪刺激的大脑反应。“情绪”集包括在中性图像中一个具有高正性或负性效价的图像。“中性”集由四个中性图像组成。要求参与者指出哪个图片(如果有的话)是情绪的,并对该图片的效价和唤醒度进行评分。在串行条件下,事件相关电位(ERP)与刺激开始时间锁定。在并行条件下,ERP 与图像上的第一个眼进入时间锁定。眼球运动结果显示情绪信息,特别是不愉快信息的处理得到促进。在两种呈现条件下的 EEG 结果都表明,与中性图片相比,400-500ms 时的 LPP(“晚期正电位”)振幅在不愉快和愉快图片中增大。此外,不愉快的场景比愉快的场景引起更强的反应。ERP 结果不支持旁视网膜情绪处理,尽管眼球运动结果表明情绪刺激更快地吸引了注意力。因此,我们的研究结果表明,情绪处理取决于用于处理情绪内容的显性注意力资源。结果还表明,可以根据眼球运动事件对情绪图像的大脑反应进行时间锁定分析,尽管在串行呈现期间响应幅度更大。