• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性腰痛筛查问卷和Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷对持续存在问题的预测价值。

Predictive value of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire for persisting problems.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, HES-SO, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland, Leukerbad, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S773-84. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1910-7. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-011-1910-7
PMID:21789527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3535213/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A small proportion of individuals with non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) develop persistent problems. Up to 80% of the total costs for NSLBP are owing to chronic NSLBP. Psychosocial factors have been described to be important in the transition from acute to chronic NSLBP. Guidelines recommend the use of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire (ALBPSQ) and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ) to identify individuals at risk of developing persistent problems, such as long-term absence of work, persistent restriction in function or persistent pain. These instruments can be used with a cutoff value, where patients with values above the threshold are further assessed with a more comprehensive examination.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed studies evaluating the accuracy of the ALBPSQ and ÖMPSQ to predict persistent problems.

RESULTS

The 13 included studies used different cutoff values for the screening questionnaires ranging from 68 to 147. The pooled sensitivity was 0.59 (0.43-0.74), while the pooled specificity was 0.77 (0.66-0.86). Heterogeneity (I (2)) was 90.02% for sensitivity and 95.41% for specificity.

CONCLUSION

Thus, we do not recommend the use of one cutoff value, but the use of a prediction model with all the individual items.

摘要

简介

一小部分非特异性下腰痛(NSLBP)患者会发展为持续性问题。高达 80%的 NSLBP 总费用归因于慢性 NSLBP。心理社会因素已被描述为从急性 NSLBP 向慢性 NSLBP 转变的重要因素。指南建议使用急性下腰痛筛查问卷(ALBPSQ)和Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷(ÖMPSQ)来识别有发展为持续性问题风险的个体,例如长期缺勤、持续功能受限或持续疼痛。这些工具可以使用截断值,超过阈值的患者需要进一步进行更全面的检查。

方法

我们系统地回顾了评估 ALBPSQ 和 ÖMPSQ 预测持续性问题准确性的研究。

结果

13 项纳入的研究为筛查问卷使用了不同的截断值,范围为 68 至 147。汇总敏感性为 0.59(0.43-0.74),而汇总特异性为 0.77(0.66-0.86)。敏感性的异质性(I ²)为 90.02%,特异性的异质性为 95.41%。

结论

因此,我们不建议使用单一的截断值,而是使用包含所有个体项目的预测模型。

相似文献

1
Predictive value of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire for persisting problems.急性腰痛筛查问卷和Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷对持续存在问题的预测价值。
Eur Spine J. 2012 Aug;21 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S773-84. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1910-7. Epub 2011 Jul 26.
2
Comparison between the STarT Back Screening Tool and the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire: Which tool for what purpose? A semi-systematic review.STarT 后背筛查工具与 Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷的比较:哪种工具用于什么目的?一项半系统综述。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 May;62(3):178-188. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
3
Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of the Hausa version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in patients with non-specific low back pain.跨文化调适与奥勒布罗肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷豪萨语版在非特异性下腰痛患者中的心理计量学验证。
Scand J Pain. 2020 Sep 7;21(1):103-111. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2020-0071. Print 2021 Jan 27.
4
The predictive value of subsets of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire for return to work in chronic low back pain.厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷各子集对慢性下腰痛患者恢复工作的预测价值。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;53(3):359-365. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04398-2. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire Short-Form and STarT Back Screening Tool: Correlation and Agreement Analysis.厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷简表与STarT Back筛查工具:相关性与一致性分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Aug 1;41(15):E931-E936. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001415.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Japanese Version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire-Short Form for Chronic Low Back Pain.《Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷简表-慢性下背痛日本版的有效性和可靠性》。
Pain Physician. 2022 Jul;25(4):E681-E688.
7
Construct validity and reliability of Finnish version of Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.奥雷布洛肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷芬兰语版的结构效度和信度
Scand J Pain. 2016 Oct;13:148-153. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2016.06.002. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
8
Positive recovery for low-risk injuries screened by the short form - Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire following road traffic injury: evidence from an inception cohort study in New South Wales, Australia.采用 Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷(short form - Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire)对道路交通伤害进行筛查的低危损伤的积极康复:来自澳大利亚新南威尔士州队列研究的证据。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Nov 13;20(1):531. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2881-9.
9
Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire in chronic low back pain.《厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷》法语版在慢性下腰痛中的效度和反应度
Eur Spine J. 2016 Sep;25(9):2741-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4635-9. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
10
Test-retest reliability of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire and the Situational Pain Scale in patients with chronic low back pain.慢性下背痛患者 Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷和情境疼痛量表的重测信度。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2013 Dec 6;143:w13903. doi: 10.4414/smw.2013.13903. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypervigilance to Pain May Predict the Transition from Subacute to Chronic Back Pain: A Longitudinal Observational Study.对疼痛的过度警觉可能预示着从亚急性背痛向慢性背痛的转变:一项纵向观察研究。
J Pain Res. 2025 Jun 25;18:3141-3158. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S512911. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of a physiotherapy-directed rehabilitation programme on patients with multidirectional instability of the glenohumeral joint: a multimodal interventional MRI study protocol.多向性肩盂肱关节不稳定患者的物理治疗导向康复方案的效果:一项多模态介入性 MRI 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 19;14(2):e071287. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071287.
3
Multidimensional screening for predicting pain problems in adults: a systematic review of screening tools and validation studies.用于预测成人疼痛问题的多维筛查:筛查工具及验证研究的系统评价
Pain Rep. 2019 Sep 11;4(5):e775. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000775. eCollection 2019 Sep-Oct.
4
Cross-cultural adaptation of the 12-item Örebro musculoskeletal screening questionnaire to Japanese (ÖMSQ-12-J), reliability and clinicians' impressions for practicality.将12项厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼筛查问卷跨文化改编为日语版(ÖMSQ-12-J)、可靠性及临床医生对其实用性的印象
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Aug;29(8):1409-1415. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1409. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
5
SheppHeartCABG trial-comprehensive early rehabilitation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a protocol for a randomised clinical trial.谢泼德心脏冠状动脉搭桥术后综合早期康复试验:一项随机临床试验方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 17;7(1):e013038. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013038.
6
Predicting Persistent Back Symptoms by Psychosocial Risk Factors: Validity Criteria for the ÖMPSQ and the HKF-R 10 in Germany.通过心理社会风险因素预测持续性背部症状:德国ÖMPSQ和HKF-R 10的效度标准
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 21;11(7):e0158850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158850. eCollection 2016.
7
Construct and predictive validity of the German Örebro questionnaire short form for psychosocial risk factor screening of patients with low back pain.用于腰痛患者心理社会风险因素筛查的德国厄勒布鲁问卷简表的结构效度和预测效度。
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jan;25(1):325-332. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4196-3. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
8
Early Workplace Communication and Problem Solving to Prevent Back Disability: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial Among High-Risk Workers and Their Supervisors.早期工作场所沟通与问题解决以预防背部残疾:高危工人及其主管的随机对照试验结果
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Jun;26(2):150-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9596-z.
9
[Comparison of two screening questionnaires for patients with low back pain. Collation of risk factors for chronification].[两种腰痛患者筛查问卷的比较。慢性化危险因素的整理]
Schmerz. 2014 Aug;28(4):365-73. doi: 10.1007/s00482-014-1431-5.
10
Prediction of sickness absenteeism, disability pension and sickness presenteeism among employees with back pain.预测背痛员工的病假缺勤、残疾抚恤金和病假出勤。
J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Jun;24(2):278-86. doi: 10.1007/s10926-013-9454-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Low back pain in primary care: costs of care and prediction of future health care utilization.基层医疗中的下背痛:医疗成本和未来医疗利用的预测。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Aug 15;35(18):1714-20. doi: 10.1097/brs.0b013e3181cd656f.
2
Yellow flag scores in a compensable New Zealand cohort suffering acute low back pain.有补偿的新西兰急性腰痛队列中出现黄色标志分数。
J Pain Res. 2008 Dec 1;1:15-25. doi: 10.2147/jpr.s3710.
3
Development of a short form of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷短表的制定。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Oct 15;36(22):1891-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f8f775.
4
Predictive ability of a modified Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in an acute/subacute low back pain working population.改良 Örebro 肌肉骨骼疼痛问卷在急性/亚急性下背痛工作人群中的预测能力。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):449-57. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1509-4. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
5
An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care.非特异性下腰痛初级保健管理临床指南的更新概述。
Eur Spine J. 2010 Dec;19(12):2075-94. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1502-y. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
6
Cost of low back pain in Switzerland in 2005.2005 年瑞士的下背痛成本。
Eur J Health Econ. 2011 Oct;12(5):455-67. doi: 10.1007/s10198-010-0258-y. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
7
Evaluation of the predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire.奥勒布罗肌肉骨骼疼痛筛查问卷的预测有效性评估。
Clin J Pain. 2009 Oct;25(8):666-70. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a08732.
8
The ability of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire to predict sick leave in patients with acute neck pain.急性下腰痛筛查问卷预测急性颈部疼痛患者病假情况的能力。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Mar-Apr;32(3):178-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2009.02.004.
9
Diagnostic test accuracy may vary with prevalence: implications for evidence-based diagnosis.诊断试验准确性可能随患病率而变化:对循证诊断的启示
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Jan;62(1):5-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.04.007. Epub 2008 Sep 7.
10
A systematic review of the predictive ability of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire.厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼疼痛问卷预测能力的系统评价
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jul 1;33(15):E494-500. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817ba3bb.