Linton Steven J, Boersma Katja, Traczyk Michal, Shaw William, Nicholas Michael
Department of Law, Psychology, and Social Work, Center for Health and Medical Psychology, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Landstingshälsan, Occupational Health Services, Örebro, Sweden.
J Occup Rehabil. 2016 Jun;26(2):150-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-015-9596-z.
Purpose There is a clear need for interventions that successfully prevent the development of disability due to back pain. We hypothesized that an intervention aimed at both the worker and the workplace could be effective. Hence, we tested the effects of a new early intervention, based on the misdirected problem solving model, aimed at both workers at risk of long-term impairments and their workplace. Methods Supervisors of volunteers with back pain, no red flags, and a high score on a screen (Örebro Musculoskeletal Screening Questionnaire) were randomized to either an evidence based treatment as usual (TAU) or to a worker and workplace package (WWP). The WWP intervention included communication and problem solving skills for the patient and their immediate supervisor. The key outcome variables of work absence due to pain, health-care utilization, perceived health, and pain intensity were collected before, after and at a 6 month follow up. Results The WWP showed significantly larger improvements relative to the TAU for work absence due to pain, perceived health, and health-care utilization. Both groups improved on pain ratings but there was no significant difference between the groups. The WWP not only had significantly fewer participants utilizing health care and work absence due to pain, but the number of health care visits and days absent were also significantly lower than the TAU. Conclusions The WWP with problem solving and communication skills resulted in fewer days off work, fewer health care visits and better perceived health. This supports the misdirected problem solving model and indicates that screening combined with an active intervention to enhance skills is quite successful and likely cost-effective. Future research should replicate and extend these findings with health-economic analyses.
目的 显然需要采取干预措施来成功预防因背痛导致的残疾。我们假设针对工人和工作场所的干预措施可能有效。因此,我们基于错误导向的问题解决模型,对一种针对有长期损伤风险的工人及其工作场所的新型早期干预措施的效果进行了测试。方法 对患有背痛、无警示信号且在筛查(厄勒布鲁肌肉骨骼筛查问卷)中得分较高的志愿者的主管进行随机分组,分别接受常规循证治疗(TAU)或工人与工作场所套餐(WWP)。WWP干预包括为患者及其直属主管提供沟通和问题解决技能培训。在干预前、干预后及6个月随访时收集因疼痛导致的缺勤、医疗保健利用、自我感知健康和疼痛强度等关键结局变量。结果 与TAU相比,WWP在因疼痛导致的缺勤、自我感知健康和医疗保健利用方面有显著更大的改善。两组的疼痛评分均有所改善,但组间无显著差异。WWP不仅因疼痛利用医疗保健和缺勤的参与者显著减少,而且医疗保健就诊次数和缺勤天数也显著低于TAU。结论 具备问题解决和沟通技能的WWP导致更少的工作日缺勤、更少的医疗保健就诊次数以及更好的自我感知健康。这支持了错误导向的问题解决模型,并表明筛查与积极的技能提升干预相结合相当成功且可能具有成本效益。未来的研究应通过卫生经济分析来复制和扩展这些发现。