Mudde G C, Van Reijsen F C, Boland G J, de Gast G C, Bruijnzeel P L, Bruijnzeel-Koomen C A
Department of Immunohaematology, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Immunology. 1990 Mar;69(3):335-41.
To investigate the role of IgE-bearing Langerhans' cells (LC) from atopic dermatitis (AD) patients in antigen presentation, IgE+LC and non-IgE bearing LC (IgE-LC) from AD patients were investigated for their antigen-presenting capacity and compared to antigen-presenting cells (APC) from peripheral blood. The T-cell response to Candida albicans, using IgE+LC from AD patients as APC, was in the same range as with IgE-LC. Also, the T-cell response to Candida with autologous APC from peripheral blood did not significantly differ between these groups. In contrast to this finding, the T-cell response to house dust allergen (HDA) was dependent on the type of APC used. If non-T cells from peripheral blood were used as APC, both AD patients and controls responded to HDA. However, when LC were used as APC, a T-cell response to HDA was only observed in the presence of IgE+LC. IgE-LC from AD patients or LC from normal controls were unable to present HDA. Preincubation of IgE+LC with anti-IgE or anti-kappa/lambda antibodies inhibited HDA-induced T-cell proliferation, whereas the response to Candida was not affected. These in vitro results, which demonstrate the necessity of cell-bound IgE on LC for the presentation of aero-allergens, strongly correlate with the in vivo presence of a positive delayed patch reaction to the same antigens. When the LC of a patient appeared to be IgE-, the in vitro proliferative response as well as, in most cases, the in vivo patch test reaction to the same antigens was negative. In conclusion, these experiments demonstrate that there are at least two different mechanisms by which LC capture antigens for antigen presentation. In one of them cell-bound IgE, as can be demonstrated on LC from AD patients, plays a crucial role. The binding and presentation of HDA by APC from peripheral blood can take place independently of cell-bound IgE. Candida can be presented by both types of APC in the absence of IgE.
为研究特应性皮炎(AD)患者中携带IgE的朗格汉斯细胞(LC)在抗原呈递中的作用,对AD患者的IgE⁺LC和非携带IgE的LC(IgE-LC)的抗原呈递能力进行了研究,并与外周血中的抗原呈递细胞(APC)进行比较。以AD患者的IgE⁺LC作为APC时,对白色念珠菌的T细胞反应与IgE-LC时处于相同范围。此外,这些组之间使用外周血自体APC对白色念珠菌的T细胞反应无显著差异。与这一发现相反,对屋尘过敏原(HDA)的T细胞反应取决于所用APC的类型。如果使用外周血中的非T细胞作为APC,AD患者和对照组均对HDA有反应。然而,当使用LC作为APC时,仅在存在IgE⁺LC的情况下观察到对HDA的T细胞反应。AD患者的IgE-LC或正常对照的LC无法呈递HDA。用抗IgE或抗κ/λ抗体对IgE⁺LC进行预孵育可抑制HDA诱导的T细胞增殖,而对白色念珠菌的反应不受影响。这些体外结果表明LC上细胞结合的IgE对于气源性过敏原呈递的必要性,与对相同抗原的阳性迟发性斑贴反应在体内的存在密切相关。当患者的LC似乎为IgE阴性时,对相同抗原的体外增殖反应以及在大多数情况下的体内斑贴试验反应均为阴性。总之,这些实验表明,LC捕获抗原用于抗原呈递至少有两种不同机制。其中之一是细胞结合的IgE,如在AD患者的LC上所示,起着关键作用。外周血APC对HDA的结合和呈递可独立于细胞结合的IgE发生。在没有IgE的情况下,两种类型的APC均可呈递白色念珠菌。