• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

透视美国医疗体系:与十二个工业化国家的比较

The U.S. health system in perspective: a comparison of twelve industrialized nations.

作者信息

Squires David A

机构信息

International Program in Health Policy and Innovation, Commonwealth Fund, USA.

出版信息

Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2011 Jul;16:1-14.

PMID:21796847
Abstract

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) tracks and reports on more than 1,200 health system measures across 34 industrialized countries. This analysis concentrated on 2010 OECD health data for Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Health care spending in the U.S. towers over the other countries. The U.S. has fewer hospital beds and physicians, and sees fewer hospital and physician visits, than in most other countries. Prescription drug utilization, prices, and spending all appear to be highest in the U.S., as does the supply, utilization, and price of diagnostic imaging. U.S. performance on a limited set of quality measures is variable, ranking highly on five-year cancer survival, middling on in-hospital case-specific mortality, and poorly on hospital admissions for chronic conditions and amputations due to diabetes. Findings suggest opportunities for cross-national learning to improve health system performance.

摘要

经济合作与发展组织(OECD)对34个工业化国家的1200多项卫生系统指标进行跟踪和报告。本分析集中于OECD 2010年澳大利亚、加拿大、丹麦、法国、德国、荷兰、新西兰、挪威、瑞典、瑞士、英国和美国的卫生数据。美国的医疗保健支出远高于其他国家。与大多数其他国家相比,美国的医院床位和医生数量较少,住院和看医生的次数也较少。美国的处方药使用量、价格和支出似乎都是最高的,诊断成像的供应、使用和价格也是如此。美国在一套有限的质量指标上的表现参差不齐,在五年癌症生存率方面排名很高,在医院特定病例死亡率方面排名中等,在慢性病住院率和糖尿病截肢方面表现不佳。研究结果表明存在跨国学习以改善卫生系统绩效的机会。

相似文献

1
The U.S. health system in perspective: a comparison of twelve industrialized nations.透视美国医疗体系:与十二个工业化国家的比较
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2011 Jul;16:1-14.
2
U.S. health care from a global perspective: spending, use of services, prices, and health in 13 countries.从全球视角看美国医疗保健:13个国家的支出、服务使用、价格及健康状况
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2015 Oct;15:1-15.
3
Measuring the U.S. health care system: a cross-national comparison.衡量美国医疗保健系统:一项跨国比较。
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2010 Jun;90:1-10.
4
Explaining high health care spending in the United States: an international comparison of supply, utilization, prices, and quality.解释美国高昂的医疗保健支出:供给、利用、价格和质量的国际比较
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 May;10:1-14.
5
Explaining high health care spending in the United States: an international comparison of supply, utilization, prices, and quality.解释美国高昂的医疗保健支出:供给、利用、价格和质量的国际比较
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2012 May;10:1-14.
6
Health spending in OECD countries in 2004: an update.经合组织国家2004年的卫生支出:最新情况
Health Aff (Millwood). 2007 Sep-Oct;26(5):1481-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.26.5.1481.
7
Cross-national comparisons of health systems using OECD data, 1999.利用经合组织数据进行的1999年卫生系统跨国比较。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 May-Jun;21(3):169-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.3.169.
8
Health Care Spending in the United States and Other High-Income Countries.美国和其他高收入国家的医疗保健支出。
JAMA. 2018 Mar 13;319(10):1024-1039. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.1150.
9
Paying for Prescription Drugs Around the World: Why Is the U.S. an Outlier?全球处方药支付情况:为何美国与众不同?
Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2017 Oct 1;2017:1-14.
10
Performance of UK National Health Service compared with other high income countries: observational study.英国国民保健制度与其他高收入国家的表现比较:观察性研究。
BMJ. 2019 Nov 27;367:l6326. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l6326.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpretable Predictive Models to Understand Risk Factors for Maternal and Fetal Outcomes.用于理解母婴结局风险因素的可解释预测模型。
J Healthc Inform Res. 2023 Oct 13;8(1):65-87. doi: 10.1007/s41666-023-00151-4. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
It takes quality improvement to cross the chasm.要跨越鸿沟,需要质量改进。
BMJ Open Qual. 2023 Jul;12(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001906.
3
Development of the simulation-based German albuminuria screening model (S-GASM) for estimating the cost-effectiveness of albuminuria screening in Germany.
基于模拟的德国白蛋白尿筛查模型(S-GASM)的开发,用于估算德国白蛋白尿筛查的成本效益。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 5;17(1):e0262227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262227. eCollection 2022.
4
Disparities in Cognitive Impairment With Anticholinergic Drug Use: A Population-Based Study.使用抗胆碱能药物导致认知障碍的差异:一项基于人群的研究。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Jun;11(3):e277-e286. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000952.
5
Assessment of Electronic Health Record Use Between US and Non-US Health Systems.评估美国与非美国医疗体系间电子健康记录的使用情况。
JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Feb 1;181(2):251-259. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7071.
6
Using influenza surveillance networks to estimate state-specific prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in the United States.利用流感监测网络估计美国各州 SARS-CoV-2 的特定流行率。
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Jul 29;12(554). doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abc1126. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
7
Disparities in the appropriateness of medication use: Analysis of the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) population-based cohort study.药物使用适宜性的差异:基于人群的队列研究“中风地理和种族差异原因分析(REGARDS)”
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Dec;16(12):1702-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
8
Hospitalisation of people with dementia: evidence from English electronic health records from 2008 to 2016.2008 年至 2016 年英国电子健康记录中的痴呆症患者住院情况证据。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;34(6):567-577. doi: 10.1007/s10654-019-00481-x. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
9
The impact of pharmaceutical innovation on premature cancer mortality in Canada, 2000-2011.2000 - 2011年加拿大药物创新对癌症过早死亡率的影响
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2015 Sep;15(3):339-359. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9172-2. Epub 2015 Jun 26.
10
Does Increased Medication Use among Seniors Increase Risk of Hospitalization and Emergency Department Visits?老年人用药增加会增加住院和急诊就诊风险吗?
Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug;52(4):1550-1569. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12560. Epub 2016 Sep 27.