• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

AD8-巴西:用葡萄牙语对认知障碍筛查访谈进行跨文化验证。

AD8-Brazil: cross-cultural validation of the ascertaining dementia interview in Portuguese.

机构信息

University of Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil.

出版信息

J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;27(1):177-85. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-100915.

DOI:10.3233/JAD-2011-100915
PMID:21799253
Abstract

Dementia is a global public health problem and detection in the primary care setting, particularly in developing countries, is challenging. The aim of this research was to produce the cross-cultural validation of the AD8 interview to the Brazilian Portuguese Language. The original version of the AD8 was submitted to translation, back-translation, and application of the questionnaire to 20 elderly informants for face validation. The AD8-Brazil was then evaluated in 109 community-dwelling elderly with a sociodemographic questionnaire, clinical examination, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Katz Inventory of Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and Clinical Dementia Rating scale (CDR). The AD8-Brazil was compared with the other instruments and with the clinical diagnosis (DSM-IV) for criterion validation. There was significant agreement of AD8-Brazil with diagnosis of dementia (p < 0.001), MMSE (p = 0.047), and ADL (PFisher = 0.004). Also, the AD8-Brazil was able to differentiate the stages of dementia by CDR scale. The reliability was high (alpha = 0.818) and reproducibility analysis showed excellent inter-rater (kappa = 0.889) and test-retest consistency (kappa = 0.814). The AD8-Brazil showed excellent discrimination between CDR 0 and CDR > 0 (area under the curve 86.1%) and between CDR 0 and CDR 0.5 (area under the curve 76.9%). The administration of the questionnaire took 2.3 ± 0.1 minutes. The Brazilian version of the AD8 is a valid, reliable, quick, and easy screening instrument for dementia.

摘要

痴呆是一个全球性的公共卫生问题,在初级保健环境中进行检测,尤其是在发展中国家,具有挑战性。本研究的目的是为巴西葡萄牙语版 AD8 访谈进行跨文化验证。原始版本的 AD8 经过翻译、回译和问卷调查,对 20 名老年受访者进行了面对面验证。然后,AD8-Brazil 在 109 名居住在社区的老年人中进行了评估,使用社会人口学问卷、临床检查、简易精神状态检查(MMSE)、Katz 日常生活活动量表(ADL)和临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)。AD8-Brazil 与其他工具和临床诊断(DSM-IV)进行了比较,以进行标准验证。AD8-Brazil 与痴呆诊断(p < 0.001)、MMSE(p = 0.047)和 ADL(PFisher = 0.004)的一致性显著。此外,AD8-Brazil 还可以通过 CDR 量表区分痴呆的阶段。信度高(alpha = 0.818),重测分析显示良好的组内一致性(kappa = 0.889)和测试-重测一致性(kappa = 0.814)。AD8-Brazil 在 CDR 0 与 CDR > 0(曲线下面积 86.1%)和 CDR 0 与 CDR 0.5(曲线下面积 76.9%)之间具有出色的区分能力。问卷的管理时间为 2.3 ± 0.1 分钟。巴西版 AD8 是一种有效、可靠、快速且易于使用的痴呆筛查工具。

相似文献

1
AD8-Brazil: cross-cultural validation of the ascertaining dementia interview in Portuguese.AD8-巴西:用葡萄牙语对认知障碍筛查访谈进行跨文化验证。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;27(1):177-85. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-100915.
2
Validity and reliability of the Korean version of the AD8 informant interview (K-AD8) in dementia.中文版 AD8 知情者访谈(K-AD8)在痴呆症中的有效性和可靠性。
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009 Oct-Dec;23(4):371-6. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e31819e6881.
3
Validity and reliability of the AD8 informant interview in dementia.AD8知情者访谈在痴呆症中的效度和信度
Neurology. 2006 Dec 12;67(11):1942-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000247042.15547.eb.
4
The reliability and validity of the informant AD8 by comparison with a series of cognitive assessment tools in primary healthcare.在初级医疗保健中,通过与一系列认知评估工具相比较, informant AD8的可靠性和有效性。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Mar;28(3):443-52. doi: 10.1017/S1041610215001702. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
5
Accuracy of the Brazilian version of the informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly at screening for dementia in community-dwelling elderly participants: findings from FIBRA-RJ study.巴西版老年人认知功能下降知情者问卷在社区居住老年参与者痴呆筛查中的准确性:来自FIBRA-RJ研究的结果
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2014 Sep;27(3):212-9. doi: 10.1177/0891988714524626. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
6
Assessing early to late stage dementia: the TSI and BANS-S scales in the nursing-home.评估早期至晚期痴呆症:养老院中的TSI和BANS-S量表
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2005 Dec;20(12):1138-45. doi: 10.1002/gps.1406.
7
The AD8: a brief informant interview to detect dementia.AD8:一种用于检测痴呆症的简短 informant 访谈。 (注:这里 informant 直译为“提供信息者”,在医学语境中可理解为访谈对象等,具体含义需结合上下文确定)
Neurology. 2005 Aug 23;65(4):559-64. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000172958.95282.2a.
8
[The reliability and validity of Chinese version of AD8].[中文版AD8的信效度]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Oct;51(10):777-80.
9
[Psychometric properties and diagnostic usefulness of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-Revised in a Chilean elderly sample].[阿登布鲁克认知检查修订版在智利老年样本中的心理测量特性及诊断效用]
Rev Med Chil. 2012 Aug;140(8):1006-13. doi: 10.4067/S0034-98872012000800006.
10
Delirium subtype identification and the validation of the Delirium Rating Scale--Revised-98 (Dutch version) in hospitalized elderly patients.住院老年患者的谵妄亚型识别及谵妄评定量表修订版98(荷兰语版)的验证
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2006 Sep;21(9):876-82. doi: 10.1002/gps.1577.

引用本文的文献

1
A re-evaluation study and literature review on AD8 as a screening tool for dementia.一项关于AD8作为痴呆筛查工具的重新评估研究及文献综述。
PLoS One. 2025 May 5;20(5):e0321570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0321570. eCollection 2025.
2
Efficacy of for unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia: protocol for a randomized and controlled clinical trial.针对痴呆症患者 unpaid caregivers 的[具体干预措施]的疗效:一项随机对照临床试验方案 。 (注:原文中“for unpaid caregivers of people living with dementia”前缺少具体干预措施的内容,这里用[具体干预措施]表示原文此处信息缺失)
Dement Neuropsychol. 2023 Nov 24;17:e20230040. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2023-0040. eCollection 2023.
3
Diagnostic accuracy of Ascertain Dementia 8-item Questionnaire by participant and informant-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
参与者和知情人评估的 Ascertain Dementia 8 项问卷的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 12;18(9):e0291291. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291291. eCollection 2023.
4
Development and validation of the Ascertain Dementia 8 (AD8) Thai version.《Ascertain Dementia 8(AD8)泰文版的编制与验证》。
Psychogeriatrics. 2022 Nov;22(6):795-801. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12884. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
5
Validity and reliability of the Farsi version of the ascertain dementia 8-item (AD8-F) informant interview in Iranian patients with mild neurocognitive disorder.伊朗轻度神经认知障碍患者使用阿兹海默病 8 项简易筛查量表(AD8-F)访谈进行评估的信度和效度研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Oct 14;22(1):801. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03391-y.
6
Prevalence of dementia in Latin America and Caribbean countries: Systematic review and meta-analyses exploring age, sex, rurality, and education as possible determinants.拉丁美洲和加勒比国家痴呆症的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析探讨了年龄、性别、农村地区和教育等可能的决定因素。
Ageing Res Rev. 2022 Nov;81:101703. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2022.101703. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
7
Validation of AD8-Philippines (AD8-P): A Brief Informant-Based Questionnaire for Dementia Screening in the Philippines.菲律宾版AD8问卷(AD8-P)的验证:一种基于 informant 的用于菲律宾痴呆筛查的简短问卷。
Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2021 Oct 31;2021:7750235. doi: 10.1155/2021/7750235. eCollection 2021.
8
Performance of the Eight-item Informant Interview to Differentiate Aging and Dementia within a context similar to the Swedish primary healthcare sector: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy studies.八条目知情者访谈在类似于瑞典基层医疗保健部门的背景下区分衰老与痴呆的表现:一项对诊断准确性研究的系统综述。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2020 Dec;38(4):454-463. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2020.1844370. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
9
AD-8 for detection of dementia across a variety of healthcare settings.用于在各种医疗环境中检测痴呆症的AD-8量表。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Mar 4;3(3):CD011121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011121.pub2.
10
Validation into Arabic versions of Dementia Rating Scales, Dementia Caregivers Scales, and Dementia Research Instruments.痴呆评定量表、痴呆照顾者量表和痴呆研究工具阿拉伯语版本的验证。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2018 Jul 7;10:796-801. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.06.003. eCollection 2018.