Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011 Jul;36 Suppl 1:S101-12. doi: 10.1139/h11-043.
Physical activity is becoming increasingly acknowledged as an integral component of in the multidisciplinary management of cancer patients. Intensive inquiry in this area is likely to increase further over the next decade; however, cancer-specific, evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for physical activity are not available. A systematic literature review was performed of all studies conducting an exercise training intervention and (or) any form of objective exercise test among adults diagnosed with cancer. Studies were assessed according to evaluation criteria developed by a panel of experts. A total of 118 studies involving 5529 patients were deemed eligible. Overall, the results suggest that exercise training and maximal and submaximal exercise testing are relatively safe procedures with a total nonlife-threatening adverse event rate of <2%. There was only 1 exercise training-related death. However, the quality of exercise testing methodology and data reporting is less than optimal. Thus, whether the low incidence of events reflects the true safety of exercise training and exercise testing in cancer patients or less than optimal methodology and (or) data reporting remains to be determined. Evidence-based absolute and relative contraindications to physical activity and exercise training and testing are provided as well as probing decision-trees to optimize the adoption and safety of physical activity in persons diagnosed with cancer.
身体活动正日益被认为是癌症患者多学科管理的一个组成部分。在未来十年,该领域的深入研究可能会进一步增加;然而,目前还没有针对癌症的、基于证据的风险评估和身体活动建议。我们对所有在成年癌症患者中进行运动训练干预和(或)任何形式的客观运动测试的研究进行了系统的文献回顾。研究根据专家组制定的评估标准进行评估。共有 118 项涉及 5529 名患者的研究被认为符合条件。总的来说,结果表明,运动训练和最大及次最大运动测试是相对安全的程序,总非危及生命的不良事件发生率<2%。仅有 1 例与运动训练相关的死亡。然而,运动测试方法学和数据报告的质量并不理想。因此,事件发生率低是否反映了癌症患者运动训练和运动测试的真实安全性,或者是由于方法学(或)数据报告不理想,仍有待确定。本文还提供了体力活动和运动训练及测试的绝对和相对禁忌证,并提供了探索性决策树,以优化患有癌症的人群对体力活动的采用和安全性。