• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

实验哲学。

Experimental philosophy.

机构信息

Program in Cognitive Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8306, USA.

出版信息

Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:81-99. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100350. Epub 2011 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100350
PMID:21801019
Abstract

Experimental philosophy is a new interdisciplinary field that uses methods normally associated with psychology to investigate questions normally associated with philosophy. The present review focuses on research in experimental philosophy on four central questions. First, why is it that people's moral judgments appear to influence their intuitions about seemingly nonmoral questions? Second, do people think that moral questions have objective answers, or do they see morality as fundamentally relative? Third, do people believe in free will, and do they see free will as compatible with determinism? Fourth, how do people determine whether an entity is conscious?

摘要

实验哲学是一个新的跨学科领域,它使用通常与心理学相关的方法来研究通常与哲学相关的问题。本综述集中于实验哲学在四个核心问题上的研究。第一,为什么人们的道德判断似乎会影响他们对看似非道德问题的直觉?第二,人们认为道德问题有客观答案,还是他们认为道德从根本上是相对的?第三,人们是否相信自由意志,以及他们是否认为自由意志与决定论相容?第四,人们如何确定一个实体是否有意识?

相似文献

1
Experimental philosophy.实验哲学。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012;63:81-99. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100350. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
2
Experimental philosophy and the problem of free will.实验哲学与自由意志问题。
Science. 2011 Mar 18;331(6023):1401-3. doi: 10.1126/science.1192931.
3
Free will and consciousness: experimental studies.自由意志与意识:实验研究。
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Jun;21(2):915-27. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.004. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
4
Experimental philosophy of actual and counterfactual free will intuitions.关于实际和反事实自由意志直觉的实验哲学
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Nov;36:113-30. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
5
Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility.对自由意志和责任的神经科学挑战。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Sep;10(9):419-23. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.011. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
6
Pereboom and premises: asking the right questions in the experimental philosophy of free will.佩雷布姆和前提:在自由意志实验哲学中提出正确的问题。
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Mar;22(1):53-63. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.11.007. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
7
Philosophy instruction changes views on moral controversies by decreasing reliance on intuition.哲学教学通过减少对直觉的依赖来改变对道德争议的看法。
Cognition. 2023 Jul;236:105434. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105434. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
8
Judgments about moral responsibility and determinism in patients with behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia: still compatibilists.行为变异型额颞叶痴呆患者的道德责任和决定论判断:仍然是相容主义者。
Conscious Cogn. 2012 Jun;21(2):851-64. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Mar 10.
9
Persistent bias in expert judgments about free will and moral responsibility: a test of the expertise defense.专家判断中关于自由意志和道德责任的持续偏见:专业知识辩护的检验。
Conscious Cogn. 2011 Dec;20(4):1722-31. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2011.04.007. Epub 2011 May 18.
10
What Do People Find Incompatible With Causal Determinism?人们认为哪些与因果决定论不相容?
Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;40(8):2025-2049. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12314. Epub 2015 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
"All things equal": ethical principles governing why autonomous vehicle experts change or retain their opinions in trolley problems-a qualitative study.“在其他条件相同的情况下”:关于自动驾驶汽车专家在电车难题中改变或保留其观点的伦理原则——一项定性研究
Front Robot AI. 2025 May 27;12:1544272. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2025.1544272. eCollection 2025.
2
Moral Intuition Regarding the Possibility of Conscious Human Brain Organoids: An Experimental Ethics Study.关于有意识的人类脑类器官可能性的道德直觉:一项实验伦理学研究。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Dec 19;31(1):2. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00525-w.
3
Animal emotions and consciousness: a preliminary assessment of researchers' perceptions and biases and prospects for future progress.
动物情感与意识:对研究人员认知、偏见及未来进展前景的初步评估
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Nov 13;11(11):241255. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241255. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
The impact of legal expertise on moral decision-making biases.法律专业知识对道德决策偏差的影响。
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2020;7(1):103. doi: 10.1057/s41599-020-00595-8. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
5
Animal Emotions and Consciousness: Researchers' Perceptions, Biases, and Prospects for Future Progress.动物情感与意识:研究者的认知、偏见及未来进展前景
bioRxiv. 2023 Oct 17:2023.10.12.562087. doi: 10.1101/2023.10.12.562087.
6
Acceptable objectives of empirical research in bioethics: a qualitative exploration of researchers' views.生物伦理学中经验研究的可接受目标:对研究人员观点的定性探讨。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 28;23(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00845-1.
7
Reporting in Experimental Philosophy: Current Standards and Recommendations for Future Practice.实验哲学中的报告:当前标准及对未来实践的建议。
Rev Philos Psychol. 2021;12(1):49-73. doi: 10.1007/s13164-018-0414-3. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
8
When do caregivers ignore the veil of ignorance? An empirical study on medical triage decision-making.当照顾者忽视无知之幕时会怎样?一项关于医疗分诊决策的实证研究。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Jun;24(2):213-225. doi: 10.1007/s11019-020-09992-x. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
9
Addiction, Identity, Morality.成瘾、身份认同、道德
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2019 Apr-Jun;10(2):136-153. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1590480. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
Laypersons' Beliefs and Intuitions About Free Will and Determinism: New Insights Linking the Social Psychology and Experimental Philosophy Paradigms.外行人对自由意志和决定论的信念与直觉:连接社会心理学和实验哲学范式的新见解
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2018 Jul;9(5):539-549. doi: 10.1177/1948550617713254. Epub 2017 Jul 25.