Physiotherapy Department, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, Northern Ireland.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Aug;92(8):1194-201. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.012.
To investigate the efficacy of a disease-specific Expert Patient Programme (EPP) compared with usual care in patients with bronchiectasis.
Proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial.
Regional respiratory center.
Adult patients (N=64; age, >18y) with a primary diagnosis of bronchiectasis based on a respiratory physician's assessment including a computed tomographic scan.
Patients were randomly assigned to an intervention (usual care plus EPP; n=32) or control group (usual care only; n=32).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measure was the Chronic Disease Self-efficacy Scale (CDSS). Other outcome measures included the Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R), the St Georges Respiratory Questionnaire, and standard EPP questionnaires. Data were collected at baseline, postintervention, and 3 and 6 months postintervention.
This disease-specific EPP for patients with bronchiectasis significantly improved self-efficacy in 6 of 10 subscales (CDSS subscales: exercise regularly [P=.02]; get information about disease [P=.03]; obtain help from community, family, and friends [P=.06]; communicate with physician [P=.85]; manage disease in general [P=.05]; do chores [P=.04]; social/recreational activities [P=.03]; manage symptoms [P<.01]; manage shortness of breath [P=.08]; control/manage depression [P=.01]) compared with usual care. There was no improvement on IPQ-R score. Patients who received the intervention reported more symptoms and decreased quality of life between 3 and 6 months postintervention and an increase in some components of self reported health care use. Patients receiving the disease-specific EPP indicated they were satisfied with the intervention and learned new self-management techniques. There were no significant differences in lung function over time.
This original study indicates that a disease-specific EPP results in short-term improvements in self-efficacy. Based on these positive preliminary findings, a larger adequately powered study is justified to investigate the efficacy of a disease-specific EPP in patients with bronchiectasis.
探究支气管扩张症患者特定疾病专家患者方案(EPP)与常规护理相比的疗效。
概念验证随机对照试验。
区域呼吸中心。
成年患者(N=64;年龄>18 岁),根据呼吸科医生的评估,包括 CT 扫描,诊断为原发性支气管扩张症。
患者被随机分配到干预组(常规护理+EPP;n=32)或对照组(仅常规护理;n=32)。
主要结局测量为慢性病自我效能感量表(CDSS)。其他结局测量包括修订后的疾病感知问卷(IPQ-R)、圣乔治呼吸问卷和标准 EPP 问卷。数据在基线、干预后和干预后 3 个月和 6 个月收集。
该支气管扩张症特定的 EPP 显著改善了 10 个亚量表中的 6 个亚量表的自我效能感(CDSS 亚量表:定期锻炼[P=.02];获取疾病信息[P=.03];从社区、家庭和朋友那里获得帮助[P=.06];与医生沟通[P=.85];总体管理疾病[P=.05];做家务[P=.04];社会/娱乐活动[P=.03];管理症状[P<.01];管理呼吸急促[P=.08];控制/管理抑郁[P=.01]),与常规护理相比。IPQ-R 评分没有改善。接受干预的患者在干预后 3 至 6 个月报告了更多的症状和生活质量下降,自我报告的医疗保健使用的某些方面增加。接受特定疾病 EPP 的患者表示对干预感到满意,并学习了新的自我管理技术。肺功能随时间没有显著变化。
这项原始研究表明,特定疾病的 EPP 可在短期内提高自我效能感。基于这些积极的初步发现,有理由进行一项更大、更有力的研究,以调查支气管扩张症患者特定疾病 EPP 的疗效。