Faculty of Health, Social Care & Medicine, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, United Kingdom.
Cardio-Respiratory Research Centre, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 16;18(3):e0282393. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282393. eCollection 2023.
The aim of this study is to explore outcomes currently reported in physiotherapy trials for bronchiectasis and investigate the level of consistency in outcome reporting. This mapping of outcomes will be used to inform the development of a core outcome set (COS) for physiotherapy research in bronchiectasis. Outcomes reported in randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and RCT protocols were reviewed and evaluated. We included trials with physiotherapy as the main intervention, including pulmonary rehabilitation, exercise prescription, airway clearance, positive expiratory pressure devices, breathing training, self-management plans, and home exercise program. Medline, CINAHL, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) were searched from inception using a prespecified search strategy. Records including adult patients with bronchiectasis were included. Outcomes were listed verbatim and categorised into domains based on a pre-specified system, frequency of reporting and sources of variation were inspected.
Of 2158 abstracts screened, 37 trials (1202 participants) and 17 trial protocols were identified. Eighteen different physiotherapy techniques were investigated. A total of 331 outcomes were reported. No single outcome was reported by all trials. The most reported outcomes were lung function (27 trials, 50%), health related quality of life (26 trials, 48.1%), and dyspnoea (18 trials, 33.3%). A list of 104 unique outcomes covering 23 domains was created. Trials focus on physiological outcomes, mainly those related to respiratory system functions. Outcomes related to functioning and life impact are often neglected.
Outcome reporting in physiotherapy research for bronchiectasis was found to be inconsistent in terms of choosing and defining outcomes. Developing a core outcome set in this area of research is needed to facilitate aggregation of future trial results in systematic reviews that will in turn inform the strength of evidence for the effectiveness of physiotherapy. Outcome choice should include all stakeholders, including patients.
This study is registered in the PROSPERO registry under the number CRD42021266247.
本研究旨在探讨目前支气管扩张症物理治疗试验报告的结果,并调查结果报告的一致性程度。对这些结果进行映射,将有助于为支气管扩张症的物理治疗研究制定核心结局集(COS)。对随机临床试验(RCT)和 RCT 方案中报告的结果进行了回顾和评估。我们纳入了以物理治疗为主要干预措施的试验,包括肺康复、运动处方、气道清除、正压呼气装置、呼吸训练、自我管理计划和家庭运动计划。使用预先指定的搜索策略,从成立之初开始在 Medline、CINAHL、Scopus、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册中心(CENTRAL)和物理治疗证据数据库(PEDro)中进行了搜索。包括成年支气管扩张症患者的记录。结果逐字列出,并根据预先指定的系统分为不同的类别,检查了报告的频率和变异来源。
在筛选出的 2158 篇摘要中,确定了 37 项试验(1202 名参与者)和 17 项试验方案。研究了 18 种不同的物理治疗技术。共报告了 331 项结果。没有一项试验报告了所有结果。报告最多的结果是肺功能(27 项试验,50%)、健康相关生活质量(26 项试验,48.1%)和呼吸困难(18 项试验,33.3%)。创建了一个包含 23 个领域的 104 个独特结果列表。试验主要关注生理结果,主要是与呼吸系统功能相关的结果。经常忽略与功能和生活影响相关的结果。
支气管扩张症物理治疗研究的结果报告在选择和定义结果方面存在不一致性。在这一研究领域制定核心结局集,有助于对未来系统评价中试验结果进行汇总,从而为物理治疗有效性的证据强度提供信息。选择结果应包括所有利益相关者,包括患者。
本研究在 PROSPERO 注册中心注册,编号为 CRD42021266247。