Schlosspark Klinik, Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
J Rheumatol. 2011 Aug;38(8):1745-50. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.110400.
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients and healthcare professionals (HCP) recognize that episodic worsening disease activity, often described as a "flare," is a common feature of RA that can contribute to impaired function and disability. However, there is no standard definition to enable measurement of its intensity and impact. The conceptual framework of the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) RA Flare Definition Working Group includes an anchoring statement, developed at OMERACT 9 in 2008: "flare in RA" is defined as worsening of signs and symptoms of sufficient intensity and duration to lead to change in therapy. Subsequently, domains characterizing flare have been identified by comprehensive literature review, patient focus groups, and patient/HCP Delphi exercises. This led to a consensus regarding preliminary domains and a research agenda at OMERACT 10 in May 2010. The conceptual framework of flare takes into account validated approaches to measurement in RA: (1) various disease activity indices (e.g., Disease Activity Score, Clinical Disease Activity Index, Simplified Disease Activity Index); (2) use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO); and (3) characterization of minimally clinically detectable and important differences (MCDD, MCID). The measurement of RA flare is composed of data collection assessing a range of unique domains describing key features of RA worsening at the time of patient self-report of flare, and then periodically for the duration of the flare. The components envisioned are: (1) Patient self-report using a "patient global question" with well characterized and validated anchors; (2) Patient assessment using a flare questionnaire and PRO available at the time of each self-report; (3) Physician/HCP assessment of disease activity status; and (4) Physician's determination whether to change treatment. In randomized controlled trials and observational studies, such a conceptual approach is intended to lead to a valid measure of this outcome/response, thus expanding an understanding of the true impact of a therapy to limit disease activity. Clinically, this approach is intended to enhance patient-HCP communication. This article describes the conceptual framework being used by the OMERACT RA Flare Definition Working Group in developing a standardized method for description and measurement of "flare in RA" to guide individual patient treatment.
类风湿关节炎(RA)患者和医疗保健专业人员(HCP)认识到,疾病活动的间歇性恶化,通常称为“ flares”,是 RA 的常见特征,可导致功能受损和残疾。但是,目前尚无标准定义来衡量其强度和影响。 OMERACT RA flares 定义工作组的结局测量在风湿病学临床试验中的概念框架包括一个锚定陈述,该陈述是在 2008 年的 OMERACT 9 上制定的:“ RA flares”定义为症状和体征恶化的强度和持续时间足以导致治疗改变。随后,通过全面的文献回顾,患者焦点小组和患者/ HCP Delphi 练习确定了描述 flares 的特征领域。这导致了在 2010 年 5 月的 OMERACT 10 上对初步领域和研究议程达成共识。 flares 的概念框架考虑了 RA 中经过验证的测量方法:(1)各种疾病活动指数(例如,疾病活动评分,临床疾病活动指数,简化疾病活动指数);(2)使用患者报告的结局(PRO);以及(3)表征最小临床可检测和重要差异(MCDD,MCID)。 RA flares 的测量由数据收集组成,该数据收集评估了一系列独特的领域,这些领域描述了患者自我报告 flares 时 RA 恶化的关键特征,然后在 flares 持续期间定期进行评估。设想的组成部分是:(1)使用具有特征良好且经过验证的锚点的“患者整体问题”进行患者自我报告;(2)在每次自我报告时使用 flare 问卷和 PRO 进行患者评估;(3)医师/ HCP 评估疾病活动状态;以及(4)医师确定是否改变治疗。在随机对照试验和观察性研究中,这种概念方法旨在提供对该结局/反应的有效衡量,从而扩大对治疗限制疾病活动的实际影响的理解。从临床角度来看,这种方法旨在增强医患沟通。本文描述了 OMERACT RA flares 定义工作组在制定用于描述和测量“ RA flares”的标准化方法中使用的概念框架,以指导个体患者的治疗。