Suppr超能文献

[分裂情感性精神病中的残疾与残留症状——数据、方法学问题及未来研究参考文献]

[Disability and residual symptoms in schizoaffective psychoses--data, methodologic problems and references for future research].

作者信息

Marneros A, Rohde A, Deister A, Steinmeyer E M

机构信息

Universitäts-Nervenklinik Bonn.

出版信息

Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 1990 Feb;58(2):66-75. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1001171.

Abstract

Schizoaffective disorders take a position between schizophrenia and affective disorders regarding outcome in the sense of psychological residuum and social consequences. What prognosis a schizoaffective illness has depends mainly on intrasymptomatological factors: Melancholic episodes during course seem to predict a good long-term outcome, schizophrenia-typical symptoms in the opposite predestinate to the development of residuum and disability. Non-symptomatological factors do not have any direct influence on the development of a residuum and disability. The comparison of course studies is limited by severe difficulties based on methodological and definitional shortcomings. Such shortcomings are (a) broad definition of schizoaffective but also of schizophrenic psychoses, (b) globalization of the term "outcome", (c) partialization of the term "prognosis", (d) equalization of the terms "course" and "outcome", (e) ignoring of inhomogeneity and polymorphism of schizoaffective disorders, (f) global evaluation of "outcome", (g) short follow-up periods. Some suggestions how to limitate the mentioned methodological shortcomings are discussed.

摘要

分裂情感性障碍在心理残留和社会后果方面的结局介于精神分裂症和情感性障碍之间。分裂情感性疾病的预后主要取决于症状内因素:病程中出现的抑郁发作似乎预示着良好的长期结局,而典型的精神分裂症症状则相反,预示着残留症状和残疾的发展。非症状因素对残留症状和残疾的发展没有直接影响。由于方法学和定义上的缺陷,病程研究的比较受到严重困难的限制。这些缺陷包括:(a) 对分裂情感性障碍以及精神分裂症性精神病的宽泛定义;(b) “结局”一词的泛化;(c) “预后”一词的片面化;(d) “病程”和“结局”这两个术语的等同化;(e) 忽视分裂情感性障碍的异质性和多态性;(f) 对“结局”的整体评估;(g) 随访期短。本文讨论了一些如何限制上述方法学缺陷的建议。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验