Suppr超能文献

一项大型多中心欧洲研究证实了高敏 C 反应蛋白 (hsCRP) 作为糖尿病亚型诊断的临床生物标志物的有效性。

A large multi-centre European study validates high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) as a clinical biomarker for the diagnosis of diabetes subtypes.

机构信息

Oxford Centre for Diabetes Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Oxford, Churchill Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK.

出版信息

Diabetologia. 2011 Nov;54(11):2801-10. doi: 10.1007/s00125-011-2261-y. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: An accurate molecular diagnosis of diabetes subtype confers clinical benefits; however, many individuals with monogenic diabetes remain undiagnosed. Biomarkers could help to prioritise patients for genetic investigation. We recently demonstrated that high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) levels are lower in UK patients with hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 alpha (HNF1A)-MODY than in other diabetes subtypes. In this large multi-centre study we aimed to assess the clinical validity of hsCRP as a diagnostic biomarker, examine the genotype-phenotype relationship and compare different hsCRP assays.

METHODS

High-sensitivity CRP levels were analysed in individuals with HNF1A-MODY (n = 457), glucokinase (GCK)-MODY (n = 404), hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4A)-MODY (n = 54) and type 2 diabetes (n = 582) from seven European centres. Three common assays for hsCRP analysis were evaluated. We excluded 121 participants (8.1%) with hsCRP values >10 mg/l. The discriminative power of hsCRP with respect to diabetes aetiology was assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve-derived C-statistic.

RESULTS

In all centres and irrespective of the assay method, meta-analysis confirmed significantly lower hsCRP levels in those with HNF1A-MODY than in those with other aetiologies (z score -21.8, p < 5 × 10(-105)). HNF1A-MODY cases with missense mutations had lower hsCRP levels than those with truncating mutations (0.03 vs 0.08 mg/l, p < 5 × 10(-5)). High-sensitivity CRP values between assays were strongly correlated (r (2) ≥ 0.91, p ≤ 1 × 10(-5)). Across the seven centres, the C-statistic for distinguishing HNF1A-MODY from young adult-onset type 2 diabetes ranged from 0.79 to 0.97, indicating high discriminative accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In the largest study to date, we have established that hsCRP is a clinically valid biomarker for HNF1A-MODY in European populations. Given the modest costs and wide availability, hsCRP could translate rapidly into clinical practice, considerably improving diagnosis rates in monogenic diabetes.

摘要

目的/假设:准确的糖尿病亚型分子诊断可带来临床获益;然而,许多单基因糖尿病患者仍未得到诊断。生物标志物可以帮助优先对遗传进行研究。我们最近证明,与其他糖尿病亚型相比,英国 HNF1A-MODY 患者的高敏 C 反应蛋白(hsCRP)水平较低。在这项大型多中心研究中,我们旨在评估 hsCRP 作为诊断生物标志物的临床有效性,检查基因型-表型关系,并比较不同的 hsCRP 检测方法。

方法

在来自七个欧洲中心的 HNF1A-MODY(n=457)、葡萄糖激酶(GCK)-MODY(n=404)、肝细胞核因子 4 阿尔法(HNF4A)-MODY(n=54)和 2 型糖尿病(n=582)患者中分析 hsCRP 水平。评估了三种常用的 hsCRP 分析检测方法。我们排除了 121 名(8.1%)hsCRP 值>10mg/l 的参与者。hsCRP 对糖尿病病因的判别能力通过受试者工作特征曲线得出的 C 统计量来评估。

结果

在所有中心,并且不论检测方法如何,荟萃分析均证实 HNF1A-MODY 患者的 hsCRP 水平明显低于其他病因患者(z 评分-21.8,p<5×10(-105))。具有错义突变的 HNF1A-MODY 病例的 hsCRP 水平低于具有截断突变的病例(0.03 与 0.08mg/l,p<5×10(-5))。不同检测方法之间的 hsCRP 值高度相关(r(2)≥0.91,p≤1×10(-5))。在七个中心中,用于区分 HNF1A-MODY 和青年发病的 2 型糖尿病的 C 统计量范围为 0.79 至 0.97,表明具有较高的判别准确性。

结论/解释:在迄今为止最大的研究中,我们已经确定 hsCRP 是欧洲人群中 HNF1A-MODY 的一种具有临床意义的生物标志物。鉴于其适度的成本和广泛的可用性,hsCRP 可以迅速转化为临床实践,极大地提高单基因糖尿病的诊断率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验