Boisclair M D, Ireland H, Lane D A
Department of Haematology, Charing Cross & Westminster Medical School, London, UK.
Blood Rev. 1990 Mar;4(1):25-40. doi: 10.1016/0268-960x(90)90014-j.
Broad spectrum assays which measure a range of fibrinogen/fibrin derivatives (FDPs) in serum have become an established means of identifying activation of blood coagulation and/or fibrinolysis, such as occurs in disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). There is considerable interest in the application of these assays to the diagnosis of other hypercoagulable states, such as recurrent deep venous thrombosis and myocardial infarction. In recent years, more sensitive and specific FDP assays (e.g. for fragment E, fragment E neoantigen, D-dimer, fragment D neoantigen, fibrinopeptide A and fibrin fragment beta 15-42) have been devised, some of which allow measurement in plasma of FDPs without interference from fibrinogen or certain of its derivatives. It was predicted that these assays would both avoid the possibility of artifacts introduced as a consequence of serum preparation and improve detection of hypercoagulable states. In the light of these expectations we have reviewed data published on the use of assays to detect clinical hypercoagulability, giving prominence to assays of crosslinked fibrin derivatives and nothing particularly certain studies that have compared the performance of different assays on the same samples. The accumulating evidence indicates that all of the assays are adequate for detection of DIC. The same cannot be said for other hypercoagulable states. Here much variation is evident between different studies of similar patients in the ability of a particular marker to discriminate between a normal control group and patients determined to be hypercoagulable by an independent method. This variability would seem to be a function of patient group heterogeneity and selection, as assays that detect different antigenic determinants produce results on the same plasma samples that are well correlated. It appears that the precise antigenic determinant does not critically affect detection of hypercoagulability. Additionally, some studies have indicated that use of serum need not introduce artifacts. Despite there being no other obvious advantage, the convenience of some of the plasma assays may well encourage their widespread use. Assays have also been developed for measuring activation fragments of coagulation proteins (e.g. prothrombin fragment F1 + 2 and protein C activation peptide) and for proteinase inhibitor complexes (e.g. thrombin-antithrombin complex) generated during activation of coagulation. The latter assays have been useful in providing a biochemical definition of a 'prethrombotic state'.
检测血清中一系列纤维蛋白原/纤维蛋白衍生物(FDPs)的广谱检测方法已成为识别凝血和/或纤维蛋白溶解激活的既定手段,如在弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)中发生的情况。人们对将这些检测方法应用于诊断其他高凝状态,如复发性深静脉血栓形成和心肌梗死,有着浓厚的兴趣。近年来,已经设计出了更敏感和特异的FDP检测方法(如针对E片段、E片段新抗原、D-二聚体、D片段新抗原、纤维蛋白肽A和纤维蛋白β15 - 42片段),其中一些方法能够在血浆中检测FDPs,而不受纤维蛋白原或其某些衍生物的干扰。据预测,这些检测方法既能避免因血清制备而引入假象的可能性,又能提高对高凝状态的检测。鉴于这些期望,我们回顾了关于使用检测方法来检测临床高凝状态的已发表数据,重点关注交联纤维蛋白衍生物的检测方法,并且特别提及了一些对相同样本上不同检测方法的性能进行比较的特定研究。越来越多的证据表明,所有这些检测方法都足以检测DIC。对于其他高凝状态则并非如此。在对相似患者的不同研究中,特定标志物区分正常对照组和通过独立方法确定为高凝的患者的能力存在明显差异。这种变异性似乎是患者群体异质性和选择的函数,因为检测不同抗原决定簇的检测方法在相同血浆样本上产生的结果具有良好的相关性。看来精确的抗原决定簇对高凝状态的检测没有关键影响。此外,一些研究表明使用血清不一定会引入假象。尽管没有其他明显优势,但一些血浆检测方法的便利性很可能会促使它们得到广泛应用。还开发了用于测量凝血蛋白激活片段(如凝血酶原片段F1 + 2和蛋白C激活肽)以及用于测量凝血激活过程中产生的蛋白酶抑制剂复合物(如凝血酶 - 抗凝血酶复合物)的检测方法。后一种检测方法在提供“血栓前状态”的生化定义方面很有用。