Suppr超能文献

肺动脉高压患者随访中收缩期和平均肺动脉压的超声心动图评估

Echocardiographic evaluation of systolic and mean pulmonary artery pressure in the follow-up of patients with pulmonary hypertension.

作者信息

Pyxaras Stylianos A, Pinamonti Bruno, Barbati Giulia, Santangelo Sara, Valentincic Matej, Cettolo Francesca, Secoli Gabriele, Magnani Silvia, Merlo Marco, Lo Giudice Francesco, Perkan Andrea, Sinagra Gianfranco

机构信息

Cardiovascular Department, Pulmonary Hypertension Division, University Hospital of Trieste, Via Valdoni 7, 34149, Trieste, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Echocardiogr. 2011 Sep;12(9):696-701. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer127. Epub 2011 Aug 4.

Abstract

AIMS

To identify a correction of the modified Bernoulli formula used to estimate systolic and mean pulmonary artery pressure [sPAP and mPAP; respectively: sPAP = 4 × TRv (tricuspid regurgitation velocity)(2)+ RAP (right atrial pressure); and mPAP = 0.61sPAP + 2], applicable in the follow-up of pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From January 1979 to December 2009, 60 patients with precapillary (class I and IV) and 'out of proportion' PH were consecutively enrolled in the PH Registry of Trieste. All patients underwent both echocardiographic and right heart catheter evaluation. We used a simple-linear-regression method in order to compare sPAP and mPAP Doppler-estimated values with the respective right-heart catheterization invasive variables. The comparison of the estimated with the traditional modified Bernoulli formula echo-Doppler data and the effective invasive values confirmed a significant association between them (for sPAP P< 0.001; for mPAP P= 0.006). Simple-linear-regression-derived formulas were sPAP = 1.07 × (4TRv(2)+ RAP) + 7.4 (1) and mPAP = 1.1 × (0.61sPAP + 2) + 2.5 (2). These regression-corrected formulas were validated in an external population of PH patients.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that formulas (1) and (2) could be more reliable with respect to the traditional modified Bernoulli equation, when estimating echocardiographically sPAP and mPAP in patients with PH confirmed by right-heart catheterization.

摘要

目的

确定用于估计收缩期和平均肺动脉压[sPAP和mPAP;分别为:sPAP = 4×三尖瓣反流速度(TRv)² + 右心房压(RAP);mPAP = 0.61sPAP + 2]的改良伯努利公式的校正值,该值适用于肺动脉高压(PH)患者的随访。

方法与结果

从1979年1月至2009年12月,60例毛细血管前(I级和IV级)和“不成比例”的PH患者连续纳入的里雅斯特PH注册研究。所有患者均接受了超声心动图和右心导管评估。我们采用简单线性回归方法,以便将sPAP和mPAP的多普勒估计值与各自的右心导管侵入性变量进行比较。将估计值与传统改良伯努利公式的超声多普勒数据和有效侵入性值进行比较,证实它们之间存在显著关联(sPAP的P<0.001;mPAP的P = 0.006)。简单线性回归得出的公式为sPAP = 1.07×(4TRv² + RAP)+ 7.4(1)和mPAP = 1.1×(0.61sPAP + 2)+ 2.5(2)。这些回归校正公式在PH患者的外部人群中得到了验证。

结论

我们的数据表明,在通过右心导管检查确诊的PH患者中,通过超声心动图估计sPAP和mPAP时,公式(1)和(2)相对于传统改良伯努利方程可能更可靠。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验