• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在线健康信息搜索与评估:大学生和孕产妇健康专家的观察与半结构式访谈

Online health information search and evaluation: observations and semi-structured interviews with college students and maternal health experts.

机构信息

Department of Advertising, College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8400, USA.

出版信息

Health Info Libr J. 2011 Sep;28(3):188-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00948.x. Epub 2011 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00948.x
PMID:21831218
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While the Internet is a popular source of health information, health seekers' inadequate skills to locate and discern quality information pose a potential threat to their healthcare decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine health information search and appraisal behaviours among young, heavy users of the Internet.

METHODS

In study 1, we observed and interviewed 11 college students about their search strategies and evaluation of websites. In study 2, three health experts evaluated two websites selected as the best information sources in study 1.

RESULTS

Familiarity with health websites and confidence in search strategies were major factors affecting search and evaluation behaviours. Website quality was mostly judged by aesthetics and peripheral cues of source credibility and message credibility. In contrast to users' favourable website evaluation, the experts judged the websites to be inappropriate and untrustworthy.

CONCLUSION

Our results highlight a critical need to provide young health seekers with resources and training that are specifically geared toward health information search and appraisal. The role of health seekers' knowledge and involvement with the health issue in search effort and success warrants future research.

摘要

背景

虽然互联网是一个受欢迎的健康信息来源,但健康寻求者寻找和辨别高质量信息的能力不足,这对他们的医疗决策构成了潜在威胁。

目的

我们旨在研究互联网重度使用者的健康信息搜索和评估行为。

方法

在研究 1 中,我们观察并采访了 11 名大学生,了解他们的搜索策略和网站评估情况。在研究 2 中,三位健康专家评估了在研究 1 中被选为最佳信息来源的两个网站。

结果

对健康网站的熟悉程度和对搜索策略的信心是影响搜索和评估行为的主要因素。网站质量主要通过来源可信度和信息可信度的美学和外围线索来判断。与用户对网站的有利评价相反,专家认为这些网站不合适且不可信。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了为年轻的健康寻求者提供专门针对健康信息搜索和评估的资源和培训的迫切需要。健康问题的知识和参与程度在搜索努力和成功中的作用值得未来的研究。

相似文献

1
Online health information search and evaluation: observations and semi-structured interviews with college students and maternal health experts.在线健康信息搜索与评估:大学生和孕产妇健康专家的观察与半结构式访谈
Health Info Libr J. 2011 Sep;28(3):188-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00948.x. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
2
Language preferences on websites and in Google searches for human health and food information.网站以及谷歌搜索中关于人类健康和食品信息的语言偏好。
J Med Internet Res. 2007 Jun 28;9(2):e18. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e18.
3
Internet access and utilization for health information among university students in Islamabad.伊斯兰堡大学生获取和利用互联网获取健康信息的情况。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2008 Oct-Dec;20(4):153-6.
4
Googling Self-injury: the state of health information obtained through online searches for self-injury.谷歌搜索自伤:通过在线搜索自伤获取的健康信息状况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2014 May;168(5):443-9. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.187.
5
Nursing students and Internet health information.护理专业学生与互联网健康信息。
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Nov;28(8):993-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.06.002. Epub 2008 Aug 10.
6
Breast cancer on the Internet: the quality of Swedish breast cancer websites.互联网上的乳腺癌:瑞典乳腺癌网站的质量
Breast. 2004 Oct;13(5):376-82. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2004.03.003.
7
An analysis of cluster headache information provided on internet websites.对互联网网站上提供的丛集性头痛信息的分析。
Headache. 2008 Mar;48(3):378-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00951.x. Epub 2007 Nov 13.
8
Internet use for health information among college students.大学生利用互联网获取健康信息的情况。
J Am Coll Health. 2005 Jan-Feb;53(4):183-8. doi: 10.3200/JACH.53.4.183-188.
9
Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them.线上和线下健康信息搜索者的特征以及区分他们的因素。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Nov;59(9):1795-806. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.020.
10
Tau Fifine Fiafia: the binge drinking behaviours of nine New Zealand born Niuean women living in Auckland.陶·菲菲娜·菲亚菲亚:九名居住在奥克兰的新西兰出生的纽埃女性的酗酒行为。
Pac Health Dialog. 2009 Feb;15(1):104-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Motivations and Channels for Nutritional Information Verification in Spanish University Communities.评估西班牙大学社区营养信息核实的动机和渠道
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 28;22(3):357. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22030357.
2
The Mediating Role of Students' Health Information Literacy Skills: Exploring the Relationship Between Web Resource Utilization and Health Information Evaluation Proficiency.学生健康信息素养技能的中介作用:探究网络资源利用与健康信息评估能力之间的关系。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14176. doi: 10.1111/hex.14176.
3
Evaluation of the Accuracy, Credibility, and Readability of Statin-Related Websites: Cross-Sectional Study.
他汀类药物相关网站的准确性、可信度和可读性评估:横断面研究。
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Mar 14;13:e42849. doi: 10.2196/42849.
4
Superlatives, clickbaits, appeals to authority, poor grammar, or boldface: Is editorial style related to the credibility of online health messages?夸张表述、标题党、诉诸权威、语法错误或粗体字:编辑风格与在线健康信息的可信度有关吗?
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 29;13:940903. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.940903. eCollection 2022.
5
Evaluation of Web-Based Health Information From the Perspective of Women With Eating Disorders: Thematic Analysis.从饮食失调症女性的角度评估基于网络的健康信息:主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 13;24(6):e31148. doi: 10.2196/31148.
6
Use of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict the Understandability of Health Education Materials: Development and Evaluation Study.使用机器学习算法预测健康教育材料的易懂性:开发与评估研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 May 6;9(5):e28413. doi: 10.2196/28413.
7
Determinants of the Perceived Credibility of Rebuttals Concerning Health Misinformation.健康错误信息反驳意见可信度感知的决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;18(3):1345. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031345.
8
Disentangling health information appraisal competence: Results from an interdisciplinary scoping review and online consultation among Swiss stakeholders.厘清健康信息评估能力:来自瑞士利益相关者的跨学科范围审查和在线咨询的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 2;15(7):e0235474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235474. eCollection 2020.
9
Google Medical Update: Why Is the Search Engine Decreasing Visibility of Health and Medical Information Websites?谷歌医疗更新:搜索引擎为何降低健康和医疗信息网站的可见度?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 12;17(4):1160. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041160.
10
Consumer Evaluation of the Quality of Online Health Information: Systematic Literature Review of Relevant Criteria and Indicators.消费者对在线健康信息质量的评估:相关标准和指标的系统文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2019 May 2;21(5):e12522. doi: 10.2196/12522.