• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Are chinese and german children taxonomic, thematic, or shape biased? Influence of classifiers and cultural contexts.中国儿童和德国儿童在分类、主题还是形状上存在偏向?分类词和文化语境的影响。
Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 8;1:194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00194. eCollection 2010.
2
Scope of linguistic influence: does a classifier system alter object concepts?语言影响的范围:分类系统会改变物体概念吗?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):485-501. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.485.
3
Language, thought, and real nouns.语言、思维与实名词。
Cognition. 2009 Jun;111(3):329-44. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.008. Epub 2009 Apr 5.
4
Preschoolers' novel noun extensions: shape in spite of knowing better.学龄前儿童的新颖名词扩展:明知故犯的形状。
Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 8;2:317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00317. eCollection 2011.
5
Lexical effects on spoken word recognition performance among Mandarin-speaking children with normal hearing and cochlear implants.词汇对听力正常及佩戴人工耳蜗的普通话儿童口语单词识别表现的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Aug;74(8):883-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.05.005.
6
The role of visual form in lexical access: Evidence from Chinese classifier production.视觉形式在词汇获取中的作用:来自汉语量词生成的证据。
Cognition. 2010 Jul;116(1):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.04.004. Epub 2010 May 20.
7
Learning that classifiers count: Mandarin-speaking children's acquisition of sortal and mensural classifiers.了解量词的重要性:说普通话儿童对类别量词和度量量词的习得
J East Asian Ling. 2010 Nov;19(3):207-230. doi: 10.1007/s10831-010-9060-1.
8
Correlation versus prediction in children's word learning: Cross-linguistic evidence and simulations.儿童词汇学习中的相关性与预测性:跨语言证据与模拟
Lang Cogn. 2009 Oct 1;1(2):197-217. doi: 10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.010.
9
Developmental differences in children's context-dependent word learning.儿童语境相关词汇学习的发展差异。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Feb;108(2):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.011. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
10
Novel-word learning deficits in Mandarin-speaking preschool children with specific language impairments.普通话发展性语言障碍学龄前儿童的新词学习缺陷。
Res Dev Disabil. 2014 Jan;35(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.010. Epub 2013 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Sensitivity to Semantic Relationships in U.S. Monolingual English-Speaking Typical Talkers and Late Talkers.美国单语英语母语者典型说话者和晚说话者对语义关系的敏感性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 Jul 12;66(7):2404-2420. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00563. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
2
Limits of a Second Language: Native and Second Languages in Management Team Communication.第二语言的局限:管理团队沟通中的母语与第二语言
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 21;12:580946. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.580946. eCollection 2021.
3
Taxonomic and thematic semantic systems.分类和主题语义系统。
Psychol Bull. 2017 May;143(5):499-520. doi: 10.1037/bul0000092. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
4
How Early is Infants' Attention to Objects and Actions Shaped by Culture? New Evidence from 24-Month-Olds Raised in the US and China.婴儿对物体和动作的注意力受文化塑造有多早?来自在美国和中国抚养的24个月大婴儿的新证据。
Front Psychol. 2016 Feb 5;7:97. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00097. eCollection 2016.
5
Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers.语法范畴的基础:手部空间中的注意偏向影响汉语名量词的语法一致性判断。
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 27;6:1299. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01299. eCollection 2015.
6
Preschoolers' novel noun extensions: shape in spite of knowing better.学龄前儿童的新颖名词扩展:明知故犯的形状。
Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 8;2:317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00317. eCollection 2011.

本文引用的文献

1
Language-relative construal of individuation constrained by universal ontology: revisiting language universals and linguistic relativity.语言相对的个体化构建受到普遍本体论的限制:重新审视语言普遍性和语言相对性。
Cogn Sci. 2007 May 6;31(3):385-413. doi: 10.1080/15326900701326436.
2
Unconscious effects of language-specific terminology on preattentive color perception.特定语言术语对前注意颜色感知的无意识影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Mar 17;106(11):4567-70. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0811155106. Epub 2009 Feb 24.
3
Categorical perception of colour in the left and right visual field is verbally mediated: evidence from Korean.左右视野中颜色的分类感知是通过语言介导的:来自韩语的证据。
Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):752-62. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.001. Epub 2007 Oct 10.
4
Scope of linguistic influence: does a classifier system alter object concepts?语言影响的范围:分类系统会改变物体概念吗?
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):485-501. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.485.
5
Russian blues reveal effects of language on color discrimination.俄罗斯蓝猫揭示了语言对颜色辨别的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 8;104(19):7780-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701644104. Epub 2007 Apr 30.
6
Whorf hypothesis is supported in the right visual field but not the left.沃尔夫假说在右视野得到支持,但在左视野则不然。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 10;103(2):489-94. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509868103. Epub 2005 Dec 30.
7
Grammatical gender effects on cognition: implications for language learning and language use.语法性对认知的影响:对语言学习和语言使用的启示
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 Nov;134(4):501-20. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.4.501.
8
Is it culture or is it language? Examination of language effects in cross-cultural research on categorization.是文化还是语言?跨文化分类研究中的语言效应考察。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2004 Jul;87(1):57-65. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.57.
9
Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention.物体名称学习为注意力提供在职培训。
Psychol Sci. 2002 Jan;13(1):13-9. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00403.
10
Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time.语言会塑造思维吗?说普通话和英语的人对时间的概念。
Cogn Psychol. 2001 Aug;43(1):1-22. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0748.

中国儿童和德国儿童在分类、主题还是形状上存在偏向?分类词和文化语境的影响。

Are chinese and german children taxonomic, thematic, or shape biased? Influence of classifiers and cultural contexts.

机构信息

Keio University at Shonan-Fujisawa Fujisawa, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2010 Dec 8;1:194. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00194. eCollection 2010.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00194
PMID:21833253
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3153803/
Abstract

This paper explores the effect of classifiers on young children's conceptual structures. For this purpose we studied Mandarin Chinese- and German-speaking 3- and 5-year-olds on non-lexical classification, novel-noun label extension, and inductive inference of novel properties. Some effect of the classifier system was found in Chinese children, but this effect was observed only in a non-lexical categorization task. In the label extension and property generalization tasks, children of the two language groups show strikingly similar behavior. The implications of the results for theories of the relation between language and thought as well as cultural influence on thought are discussed.

摘要

本文探讨了分类器对幼儿概念结构的影响。为此,我们对 3 岁和 5 岁的讲汉语普通话和德语的儿童进行了非词汇分类、新名词标签扩展和新属性的归纳推理研究。在汉语儿童中发现了分类器系统的一些影响,但这种影响仅在非词汇分类任务中观察到。在标签扩展和属性泛化任务中,两个语言群体的儿童表现出惊人相似的行为。讨论了这些结果对语言与思维关系理论以及文化对思维影响的启示。