• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用《长处和困难问卷》筛查注意缺陷多动障碍表型。

Screening for the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder phenotype using the strength and difficulties questionnaire.

机构信息

Unifob Health Department, RBUP Vest, 7810 Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;20(9):451-8. doi: 10.1007/s00787-011-0198-9. Epub 2011 Jul 21.

DOI:10.1007/s00787-011-0198-9
PMID:21833627
Abstract

The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) is a broad-band child mental health instrument, which has been reported to be a good screener for the ADHD phenotype. Questionnaires containing the SDQ and the 18 SNAP-IV items corresponding to the DSM-IV ADHD symptoms were completed by parents and teachers for 66% (N = 6,233) of all 7- to 9-year-olds in the city of Bergen, Norway, 2002. Screening properties of the five-item SDQ hyperactivity-inattention subscale for the DSM-IV ADHD phenotype were examined. Using the DSM-IV ADHD phenotype based on both informants as the gold standard (5.2% of the sample), the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.90-0.92) for parent and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.94-0.95) for teacher SDQ hyperactivity-inattention subscale ratings. The SDQ hyperactivity-inattention predictive algorithm identified 74% of those with the ADHD combined subtype as possible or probable cases, but only 22% of those with the inattentive subtype. The 5-item long SDQ hyperactivity-inattention subscale is a shorter substitute for the 18-item ADHD symptom list. The SDQ predictive algorithm had an acceptable sensitivity for the ADHD combined subtype, but low sensitivity for the ADHD inattentive and the ADHD hyperactive subtypes.

摘要

《长处和困难问卷》(SDQ)是一种广泛的儿童心理健康工具,据报道,它是 ADHD 表型的良好筛查工具。2002 年,挪威卑尔根市的所有 7 至 9 岁儿童中,有 66%(N=6233)的家长和教师完成了包含 SDQ 和对应 DSM-IV ADHD 症状的 18 项 SNAP-IV 项目的问卷。检查了五分量表 SDQ 多动-注意力不集中分量表对 DSM-IV ADHD 表型的筛查特性。使用基于两个信息来源的 DSM-IV ADHD 表型作为金标准(样本的 5.2%),ROC 分析显示,父母的曲线下面积为 0.91(95%CI:0.90-0.92),教师为 0.95(95%CI:0.94-0.95)。SDQ 多动-注意力不集中分量表的预测算法确定了 74%的 ADHD 混合型可能或可能病例,但只有 22%的 ADHD 注意力不集中型。5 分量表的长 SDQ 多动-注意力不集中分量表是 18 项 ADHD 症状列表的更简短替代品。SDQ 预测算法对 ADHD 混合型具有可接受的敏感性,但对 ADHD 注意力不集中型和 ADHD 多动型的敏感性较低。

相似文献

1
Screening for the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder phenotype using the strength and difficulties questionnaire.使用《长处和困难问卷》筛查注意缺陷多动障碍表型。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2011 Sep;20(9):451-8. doi: 10.1007/s00787-011-0198-9. Epub 2011 Jul 21.
2
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder in Preschoolers: The Accuracy of a Short Screener.注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)在学龄前儿童中的表现:一种简短筛查工具的准确性。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;57(6):428-435. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.03.008. Epub 2018 Apr 7.
3
Screening for the ADHD Phenotype Using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Clinical Sample of Newly Referred Children and Adolescents.使用长处和困难问卷(SDQ)在新转诊的儿童和青少年临床样本中筛查注意缺陷多动障碍表型。
J Atten Disord. 2018 Sep;22(11):1032-1039. doi: 10.1177/1087054714561858. Epub 2014 Dec 16.
4
Influence of assessment instrument on ADHD diagnosis.评估工具对注意力缺陷多动障碍诊断的影响。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Apr;23(4):197-205. doi: 10.1007/s00787-013-0442-6. Epub 2013 Jul 4.
5
The validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) for children with ADHD symptoms.《注意缺陷多动障碍儿童 Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire(SDQ)的有效性》。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 19;14(6):e0218518. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218518. eCollection 2019.
6
The predictive validity of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for child attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.《Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire 对儿童注意缺陷/多动障碍的预测效度》
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 May;28(5):625-633. doi: 10.1007/s00787-018-1226-9. Epub 2018 Sep 15.
7
Predicting ADHD in school age when using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in preschool age: a longitudinal general population study, CCC2000.使用学前儿童长处与困难问卷预测学龄期注意力缺陷多动障碍:一项2000年的纵向全人群研究
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2014 Nov;23(11):1051-60. doi: 10.1007/s00787-014-0546-7. Epub 2014 Apr 16.
8
The strengths and difficulties questionnaire as a predictor of parent-reported diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.作为家长报告的自闭症谱系障碍和注意力缺陷多动障碍诊断预测指标的长处与困难问卷。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 3;8(12):e80247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080247. eCollection 2013.
9
Outpatient screening of Japanese children with epilepsy for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD).对日本癫痫患儿进行注意缺陷多动障碍(AD/HD)的门诊筛查。
Brain Dev. 2014 Apr;36(4):301-5. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
10
Diagnostic efficiency of the SDQ for parents to identify ADHD in the UK: a ROC analysis.在英国,父母使用优势与困难问卷(SDQ)识别注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的诊断效率:一项ROC分析。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2016 Sep;25(9):949-57. doi: 10.1007/s00787-015-0815-0. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Sleep Quality as a Mediator of Internet Gaming Disorder and Executive Dysfunction in Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.睡眠质量作为青少年网络游戏障碍与执行功能障碍之间的中介因素:横断面问卷调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 9;27:e68571. doi: 10.2196/68571.
2
Exploring the Longitudinal Relationship Between Short Sleep Duration, Temperament and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms in a Biethnic Population of Children Aged Between 6 and 61 Months: A Born in Bradford Study.探究双种族 6 至 61 个月大儿童中短睡眠时间、气质与注意缺陷多动障碍症状之间的纵向关系:布拉德福德出生研究。
J Atten Disord. 2023 Jul;27(9):929-938. doi: 10.1177/10870547231168433. Epub 2023 May 8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
How often do children meet ICD-10/DSM-IV criteria of attention deficit-/hyperactivity disorder and hyperkinetic disorder? Parent-based prevalence rates in a national sample--results of the BELLA study.儿童符合注意力缺陷/多动障碍及多动障碍的国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)/精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版(DSM - IV)标准的频率如何?基于全国样本中家长报告的患病率——BELLA研究结果
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008 Dec;17 Suppl 1:59-70. doi: 10.1007/s00787-008-1007-y.
2
ADHD and health services utilization in the national health interview survey.美国国家健康访谈调查中的注意力缺陷多动障碍与医疗服务利用情况
J Atten Disord. 2009 Jan;12(4):330-40. doi: 10.1177/1087054708323248.
3
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Is of Clinical Significance Regarding Emotional and Behavioral Problems in 7-Year-Old Children With Familial Risk of Schizophrenia or Bipolar Disorder and Population-Based Controls the Danish High Risk and Resilience Study-VIA 7; A Population-Based Cohort Study.
在丹麦高危与复原力研究-VIA 7(一项基于人群的队列研究)中,针对有精神分裂症或双相情感障碍家族风险的7岁儿童及基于人群的对照样本,长处与困难问卷对其情绪和行为问题具有临床意义。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 May 25;13:861219. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.861219. eCollection 2022.
4
Predictive validity of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder from ages 3 to 5 Years.从 3 岁到 5 岁预测注意缺陷/多动障碍。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;31(7):1-10. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01750-5. Epub 2021 Mar 7.
5
Investigating Friendship Difficulties in the Pathway from ADHD to Depressive Symptoms. Can Parent-Child Relationships Compensate?探讨 ADHD 向抑郁症状发展过程中的友谊困难:亲子关系能否弥补?
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2021 Aug;49(8):1031-1041. doi: 10.1007/s10802-021-00798-w. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
6
Cost-effectiveness of Legacy for Children™ for Reducing Behavioral Problems and Risk for ADHD among Children Living in Poverty.“儿童传承计划”对减少贫困儿童行为问题及注意缺陷多动障碍风险的成本效益分析
J Child Adolesc Behav. 2015;3(5):240. doi: 10.4172/2375-4494.1000240.
7
Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance of Youth Psychopathic Traits Inventory-Child Version in Chinese Children.《青少年精神病态特质量表儿童版在中国儿童中的因子结构与测量不变性》
Front Psychol. 2019 Nov 27;10:2550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02550. eCollection 2019.
8
Elevated Gestational IL-13 During Fetal Development Is Associated With Hyperactivity and Inattention in Eight-Year-Old Children.胎儿发育过程中白细胞介素-13 水平升高与 8 岁儿童多动和注意力不集中有关。
Front Immunol. 2019 Jul 23;10:1658. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01658. eCollection 2019.
9
Differences in Hyperactivity and Inattention between Adolescents Participating and Non-Participating in A National Polish After-School Athletics Program.参与和未参与波兰全国课外田径项目的青少年在多动和注意力不集中方面的差异。
J Clin Med. 2019 May 10;8(5):647. doi: 10.3390/jcm8050647.
10
A data mining and item response mixture modeling method to retrospectively measure Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in the 1970 British Cohort Study.一种数据挖掘和项目反应混合建模方法,用于回顾性测量 1970 年英国队列研究中的《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版注意缺陷多动障碍。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Mar;28(1):e1753. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1753. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
The Nordic advantage in child mental health: separating health differences from reporting style in a cross-cultural comparison of psychopathology.
北欧在儿童心理健康方面的优势:在跨文化精神病理学比较中区分健康差异与报告风格。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2008 Jun;49(6):678-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01882.x.
4
The shifting subtypes of ADHD: classification depends on how symptom reports are combined.注意缺陷多动障碍不断变化的亚型:分类取决于症状报告的组合方式。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 Jul;36(5):731-43. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9203-7. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
5
Predicting nonresponse bias from teacher ratings of mental health problems in primary school children.从教师对小学生心理健康问题的评分预测无应答偏差。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008 Apr;36(3):411-9. doi: 10.1007/s10802-007-9187-3. Epub 2007 Dec 27.
6
Psychiatric disorders in Norwegian 8- to 10-year-olds: an epidemiological survey of prevalence, risk factors, and service use.挪威8至10岁儿童的精神疾病:患病率、风险因素及服务利用情况的流行病学调查
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;46(4):438-447. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e31803062bf.
7
Prevalence and correlates of ADHD symptoms in the national health interview survey.全国健康访谈调查中注意力缺陷多动障碍症状的患病率及其相关因素
J Atten Disord. 2005 Nov;9(2):392-401. doi: 10.1177/1087054705280413.
8
Evidence-based assessment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents.儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍的循证评估
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005 Sep;34(3):449-76. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3403_5.
9
Australian data and psychometric properties of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.澳大利亚数据及优势与困难问卷的心理测量特性
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;38(8):644-51. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01427.x.
10
Comparing psychiatric diagnoses generated by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire with diagnoses made by clinicians.比较由优势与困难问卷生成的精神科诊断与临床医生做出的诊断。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;38(8):639-43. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01428.x.