Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, 3535 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
J Anxiety Disord. 2011 Dec;25(8):1087-94. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.07.007. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
The current study assessed efficacy of combined cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and venlafaxine XR compared to venlafaxine XR alone in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) within settings where medication is typically offered as the treatment for this disorder. Patients with DSM-IV-diagnosed GAD who were recently enrolled in a long-term venlafaxine XR study were randomly offered (n=77), or not offered (n=40), the option of adding 12 sessions of CBT. Of those offered CBT, 33% (n=26) accepted and attended at least one treatment session. There were no differences between the combined treatment group and the medication only group on primary or secondary efficacy measures in any of the sample comparisons. Many patients who present in medical/psychopharmacology settings seeking treatment for GAD decline the opportunity to receive adjunctive treatment. Of those that receive CBT, there appears to be no additional benefit of combined treatment compared to venlafaxine XR alone.
本研究评估了在药物治疗通常是广泛性焦虑症(GAD)治疗选择的环境中,与单独使用文拉法辛 XR 相比,联合认知行为疗法(CBT)和文拉法辛 XR 治疗广泛性焦虑症的疗效。最近参加文拉法辛 XR 长期研究的符合 DSM-IV 诊断的 GAD 患者被随机提供(n=77)或不提供(n=40)添加 12 次 CBT 的选择。在接受 CBT 的患者中,有 33%(n=26)接受并至少参加了一次治疗。在任何样本比较中,联合治疗组与仅药物治疗组在主要或次要疗效测量上均无差异。许多在医疗/精神药理学环境中出现并寻求 GAD 治疗的患者拒绝接受辅助治疗的机会。在接受 CBT 的患者中,与单独使用文拉法辛 XR 相比,联合治疗似乎没有额外的益处。