Smit William, Sabbe Bart, Prinzie Peter
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2011 Aug;23(4):277-287. doi: 10.1007/s10882-011-9227-3. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
The objective of this study was to investigate the internal consistency and the construct validity of the Dutch version of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS-NL1.0; Buntinx 2006) in individuals with physical disabilities (N = 65). To investigate the construct validity, the relationship between SIS subscales and practical skills (Barthel Index; BI) was calculated. Support was provided for the internal consistency. The SIS subscales (except Behavior) had moderate to high intercorrelations and the SIS was able to discriminate between groups with different number of disabilities. However, weak relationships were found between the BI and four out of eight SIS subscales. For people with physical disabilities, future revisions of the SIS should also take into consideration limitations in practical skills in other support domains.
本研究的目的是调查荷兰版支持强度量表(SIS-NL1.0;Buntinx,2006)在身体残疾个体(N = 65)中的内部一致性和结构效度。为了调查结构效度,计算了SIS分量表与实践技能(巴氏指数;BI)之间的关系。研究结果支持了该量表的内部一致性。SIS分量表(行为分量表除外)具有中度到高度的相互关联性,并且SIS能够区分不同残疾数量的群体。然而,在BI与八个SIS分量表中的四个之间发现了较弱的关系。对于身体残疾者,SIS的未来修订还应考虑其他支持领域中实践技能的局限性。