Reliability and Validity of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) Measured in Adults with Physical Disabilities.
作者信息
Smit William, Sabbe Bart, Prinzie Peter
出版信息
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2011 Aug;23(4):277-287. doi: 10.1007/s10882-011-9227-3. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to investigate the internal consistency and the construct validity of the Dutch version of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS-NL1.0; Buntinx 2006) in individuals with physical disabilities (N = 65). To investigate the construct validity, the relationship between SIS subscales and practical skills (Barthel Index; BI) was calculated. Support was provided for the internal consistency. The SIS subscales (except Behavior) had moderate to high intercorrelations and the SIS was able to discriminate between groups with different number of disabilities. However, weak relationships were found between the BI and four out of eight SIS subscales. For people with physical disabilities, future revisions of the SIS should also take into consideration limitations in practical skills in other support domains.
摘要
相似文献
1
Reliability and Validity of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) Measured in Adults with Physical Disabilities.
J Dev Phys Disabil. 2011 Aug;23(4):277-287. doi: 10.1007/s10882-011-9227-3. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
2
Usefulness of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS) for persons with other than intellectual disabilities.非智力残疾人群使用支持强度量表（SIS）的有效性。
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Nov-Dec;30(6):1306-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.05.007. Epub 2009 Jun 17.
3
Evaluating the inter-respondent (consumer vs. staff) reliability and construct validity (SIS vs. Vineland) of the Supports Intensity Scale on a Dutch sample.在一个荷兰样本中评估支持强度量表的应答者间（消费者与工作人员）信度和结构效度（SIS与文兰量表）。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Apr;53(4):329-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01149.x. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
4
Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version.《卒中影响量表3.0：韩文版的信效度评估》
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;41(3):387-393. doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.387. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
5
6
Internal consistency and validity of the Stroke Impact Scale 2.0 (SIS 2.0) and SIS-16 in an Australian sample.澳大利亚样本中卒中影响量表2.0（SIS 2.0）和SIS-16的内部一致性和效度
Qual Life Res. 2003 Dec;12(8):1127-35. doi: 10.1023/a:1026109920478.
7
The stroke impact scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version.中风影响量表3.0：巴西版本的可接受性、可靠性和有效性评估。
Stroke. 2008 Sep;39(9):2477-84. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
8
Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function.中风影响量表-16：身体功能的简短评估。
Neurology. 2003 Jan 28;60(2):291-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000041493.65665.d6.
9
Utilization of the supports intensity scale with psychiatric populations: psychometric properties and utility for service delivery planning.精神科人群支持强度量表的使用：心理测量学特性及其在服务提供规划中的效用。
Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2011 Oct;25(5):e9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2011.05.002. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
10
Measuring support needs in children with motor disability: Validity and utility of the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS-C).测量运动障碍儿童的支持需求：支持强度量表（SIS-C）的有效性和实用性。
Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Dec;95:103509. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.103509. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
引用本文的文献
1
Support Needs of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Implications for Their Assessment.自闭症谱系障碍儿童的支持需求：对其评估的启示
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Sep 24;13(10):793. doi: 10.3390/bs13100793.
2
A Systematic Review of the Assessment of Support Needs in People with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.智力和发育障碍人群支持需求评估的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 18;17(24):9494. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249494.
3
Differences in the support needs of children with developmental disabilities among groups of medical and behavioral needs.发育障碍儿童在医疗和行为需求组之间的支持需求差异。
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 15;8:e9557. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9557. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
Evaluating the inter-respondent (consumer vs. staff) reliability and construct validity (SIS vs. Vineland) of the Supports Intensity Scale on a Dutch sample.在一个荷兰样本中评估支持强度量表的应答者间（消费者与工作人员）信度和结构效度（SIS与文兰量表）。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2009 Apr;53(4):329-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01149.x. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
2
Reliability of the care and needs scale for assessing support needs after traumatic brain injury.用于评估创伤性脑损伤后支持需求的护理与需求量表的可靠性
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):288-95. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000290973.01872.4c.
3
The criterion-related validity of the Northwick Park Dependency Score as a generic nursing dependency instrument for different rehabilitation patient groups.作为一种适用于不同康复患者群体的通用护理依赖工具，诺斯威克公园依赖评分的效标关联效度。
Clin Rehabil. 2006 Oct;20(10):921-6. doi: 10.1177/0269215506072187.
4
Construct and criterion validities of the Service Need Assessment Profile (SNAP): a measure of support for people with disabilities.服务需求评估概况（SNAP）的结构效度和效标效度：一项针对残疾人支持情况的测量工具
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2006 Sep;31(3):148-55. doi: 10.1080/13668250600876442.
5
Support needs and adaptive behaviors.
Am J Ment Retard. 2005 Sep;110(5):393-404. doi: 10.1352/0895-8017(2005)110[393:SNAAB]2.0.CO;2.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of the care dependency scale.护理依赖量表的诊断准确性。
J Adv Nurs. 2005 May;50(4):410-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03406.x.
7
FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.功能评估：巴氏指数
Md State Med J. 1965 Feb;14:61-5.
8
Construct validity in psychological tests.心理测试中的结构效度。
Psychol Bull. 1955 Jul;52(4):281-302. doi: 10.1037/h0040957.
9
Integrating supports in assessment and planning.
Ment Retard. 2002 Oct;40(5):390-405. doi: 10.1352/0047-6765(2002)040<0390:ISIAAP>2.0.CO;2.
10
Dependence and perceived difficulty in activities of daily living in adults with cerebral palsy and spina bifida.脑瘫和脊柱裂成年患者的日常生活活动依赖及感知困难
Disabil Rehabil. 2000 May 10;22(7):299-307. doi: 10.1080/096382800296656.
Zotero 插件