• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《卒中影响量表3.0:韩文版的信效度评估》

Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version.

作者信息

Choi Seong Uk, Lee Hye Sun, Shin Joon Ho, Ho Seung Hee, Koo Mi Jung, Park Kyoung Hae, Yoon Jeong Ah, Kim Dong Min, Oh Jung Eun, Yu Se Hwa, Kim Dong A

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea.

Department of Rehabilitation Standard and Policy, National Rehabilitation Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;41(3):387-393. doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.387. Epub 2017 Jun 29.

DOI:10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.387
PMID:28758075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5532343/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the reliability and validity the Korean version of the Stroke Impact Scale (K-SIS) 3.0.

METHODS

A total of 70 post-stroke patients were enrolled. All subjects were evaluated for general characteristics, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Modified Barthel Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The SF-36 and K-SIS 3.0 assessed their health-related quality of life. Statistical analysis after evaluation, determined the reliability and validity of the K-SIS 3.0.

RESULTS

A total of 70 patients (mean age, 54.97 years) participated in this study. Internal consistency of the SIS 3.0 (Cronbach's alpha) was obtained, and all domains had good co-efficiency, with threshold above 0.70. Test-retest reliability of SIS 3.0 required correlation (Spearman's rho) of the same domain scores obtained on the first and second assessments. Results were above 0.5, with the exception of social participation and mobility. Concurrent validity of K-SIS 3.0 was assessed using the SF-36, and other scales with the same or similar domains. Each domain of K-SIS 3.0 had a positive correlation with corresponding similar domain of SF-36 and other scales (HADS, MMSE, and NIHSS).

CONCLUSION

The newly developed K-SIS 3.0 showed high inter-intra reliability and test-retest reliabilities, together with high concurrent validity with the original and various other scales, for patients with stroke. K-SIS 3.0 can therefore be used for stroke patients, to assess their health-related quality of life and treatment efficacy.

摘要

目的

建立韩语版卒中影响量表(K-SIS)3.0的信度和效度。

方法

共纳入70例卒中后患者。对所有受试者进行一般特征、简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)、改良巴氏指数、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评估。采用SF-36和K-SIS 3.0评估其健康相关生活质量。评估后进行统计分析,确定K-SIS 3.0的信度和效度。

结果

共有70例患者(平均年龄54.97岁)参与本研究。获得了SIS 3.0的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数),所有领域的协同效度良好,阈值高于0.70。SIS 3.0的重测信度要求第一次和第二次评估获得的相同领域得分具有相关性(斯皮尔曼等级相关系数)。除社会参与和活动能力外,结果均高于0.5。使用SF-36以及具有相同或相似领域的其他量表评估K-SIS 3.0的同时效度。K-SIS 3.0的每个领域与SF-36以及其他量表(HADS、MMSE和NIHSS)的相应相似领域均呈正相关。

结论

新开发的K-SIS 3.0对卒中患者显示出较高的内部一致性信度、重测信度以及与原版和其他各种量表的较高同时效度。因此,K-SIS 3.0可用于卒中患者,以评估其健康相关生活质量和治疗效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a318/5532343/7eb40cf27d85/arm-41-387-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a318/5532343/7eb40cf27d85/arm-41-387-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a318/5532343/7eb40cf27d85/arm-41-387-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version.《卒中影响量表3.0:韩文版的信效度评估》
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017 Jun;41(3):387-393. doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.387. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
2
The stroke impact scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version.中风影响量表3.0:巴西版本的可接受性、可靠性和有效性评估。
Stroke. 2008 Sep;39(9):2477-84. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
3
Quality of life in stroke survivors: first results from the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0.中风幸存者的生活质量:意大利版中风影响量表3.0可靠性和有效性的初步结果。
Ann Ig. 2010 Sep-Oct;22(5):469-79.
4
Psychometric properties of the short form of the Stroke Impact Scale in German-speaking stroke survivors.短版脑卒中影响量表在德语区脑卒中幸存者中的心理测量学特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jul 31;19(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12955-021-01826-5.
5
The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change.中风影响量表2.0版。可靠性、有效性及对变化的敏感性评估。
Stroke. 1999 Oct;30(10):2131-40. doi: 10.1161/01.str.30.10.2131.
6
[The Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the Stroke Impact Scale Version 3.0].[《卒中影响量表3.0版日语版的信度与效度》]
J UOEH. 2017;39(3):215-221. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.39.215.
7
Validation of the Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the Danish version (SS-QOL-DK).卒中特异性生活质量量表(SS-QOL)的验证:丹麦语版本(SS-QOL-DK)的信效度检验
Clin Rehabil. 2007 Jul;21(7):620-7. doi: 10.1177/0269215507075504.
8
Psychometric comparisons of four disease-specific health-related quality of life measures for stroke survivors.针对中风幸存者的四种特定疾病的健康相关生活质量测量方法的心理测量学比较。
Clin Rehabil. 2015 Aug;29(8):816-29. doi: 10.1177/0269215514555137. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
9
Cross-cultural adaptation of Life Satisfaction Checklist-11 among persons with stroke in China: A reliability and validity study.生活满意度检查表-11 在我国脑卒中患者中的跨文化调适:信度和效度研究。
Physiother Res Int. 2021 Apr;26(2):e1887. doi: 10.1002/pri.1887. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
10
Derivation and Validation of a Modified Short Form of the Stroke Impact Scale.改良版卒中影响量表简表的推导与验证
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 May 20;5(5):e003108. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.003108.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Participation Among Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.评估中风幸存者的参与度:患者报告结局指标的系统评价
Occup Ther Int. 2025 Jul 17;2025:4928745. doi: 10.1155/oti/4928745. eCollection 2025.
2
Optimizing health-related quality of life assessments for stroke survivors: a validation study of psychometric properties for the Vietnamese version of stroke impact scale 3.0.优化中风幸存者的健康相关生活质量评估:越南版中风影响量表3.0心理测量特性的验证研究
Front Public Health. 2025 May 20;13:1570980. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1570980. eCollection 2025.
3
Korean Version of the Confidence of Arm and Hand Movement Scale and Its Psychometric Properties.

本文引用的文献

1
Global burden of stroke: an underestimate - Authors' reply.中风的全球负担:低估了——作者回复
Lancet. 2014 Apr 5;383(9924):1205-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60596-1.
2
Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke.患者报告的测量结果为中风后运动功能提供了独特的见解。
Stroke. 2013 Apr;44(4):1111-6. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.674671. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
3
Participation in the chronic phase of stroke.参与中风的慢性期。
《手臂和手部运动信心量表韩文版及其心理测量特性》
Ann Rehabil Med. 2025 Apr;49(2):104-112. doi: 10.5535/arm.240077. Epub 2025 Apr 30.
4
Efficacy of brain-computer interface training with motor imagery-contingent feedback in improving upper limb function and neuroplasticity among persons with chronic stroke: a double-blinded, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial.脑机接口训练结合运动想象辅助反馈对改善慢性卒中患者上肢功能和神经可塑性的疗效:一项双盲、平行组、随机对照试验
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Jan 6;22(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01535-2.
5
Effectiveness of mixed reality-based rehabilitation on hands and fingers by individual finger-movement tracking in patients with stroke.基于个体手指运动追踪的混合现实康复治疗对脑卒中患者手部和手指的疗效。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Aug 10;21(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01418-6.
6
Cultural adaptation and validation of the Arabic version of the short 12-item stroke-specific quality of life scale.简短的12项卒中特异性生活质量量表阿拉伯语版本的文化调适与效度验证
Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 9;14:1232602. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1232602. eCollection 2023.
7
Assessment of Upper Extremity Function in People With Stroke Based on the Framework of the ICF: A Narrative Review.基于国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)框架对中风患者上肢功能的评估:一项叙述性综述
Brain Neurorehabil. 2022 Jul 27;15(2):e16. doi: 10.12786/bn.2022.15.e16. eCollection 2022 Jul.
8
Construction and Validation of the 17-Item Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL-17): A Comprehensive Short Scale to Assess the Functional, Psychosocial, and Therapeutic Factors of QOL among Stroke Survivors.构建并验证 17 项脑卒中特异性生存质量量表(SS-QOL-17):评估脑卒中患者生存质量的功能、心理社会和治疗因素的综合简短量表。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15668. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315668.
9
Korean Model for Post-acute Comprehensive rehabilitation (KOMPACT): The Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study on Early Supported Discharge.韩国急性后综合康复模式(KOMPACT):一项关于早期支持出院的实用多中心随机对照研究的研究方案
Front Neurol. 2021 Sep 8;12:710640. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.710640. eCollection 2021.
10
Effectiveness of a Home-Based Fragility Fracture Integrated Rehabilitation Management (FIRM) Program in Patients Surgically Treated for Hip Fractures.居家脆性骨折综合康复管理(FIRM)项目对接受髋关节骨折手术治疗患者的有效性
J Clin Med. 2020 Dec 23;10(1):18. doi: 10.3390/jcm10010018.
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2013 Jan-Feb;20(1):52-61. doi: 10.1310/tsr2001-52.
4
Quality of life in stroke survivors: first results from the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0.中风幸存者的生活质量:意大利版中风影响量表3.0可靠性和有效性的初步结果。
Ann Ig. 2010 Sep-Oct;22(5):469-79.
5
Social activity contributes independently to life satisfaction three years post stroke.社交活动对中风后三年的生活满意度有独立的贡献。
Clin Rehabil. 2011 May;25(5):460-7. doi: 10.1177/0269215510388314. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
6
Quality of life after stroke: the importance of a good recovery.中风后的生活质量:良好康复的重要性。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009;27 Suppl 1:204-14. doi: 10.1159/000200461. Epub 2009 Apr 3.
7
The stroke impact scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version.中风影响量表3.0:巴西版本的可接受性、可靠性和有效性评估。
Stroke. 2008 Sep;39(9):2477-84. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
8
The Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool: postimplementation evaluation.约翰霍普金斯跌倒风险评估工具:实施后评估
J Nurs Care Qual. 2007 Oct-Dec;22(4):293-8. doi: 10.1097/01.NCQ.0000290408.74027.39.
9
Characteristics of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale: results from a population-based stroke cohort at baseline and after one year.美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表的特点:基于人群的卒中队列在基线和一年后的结果。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17(1):21-7. doi: 10.1159/000073894. Epub 2003 Oct 3.
10
A 3-year review of neurologic admissions in University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria.对尼日利亚伊巴丹大学学院医院神经科住院病例的3年回顾。
West Afr J Med. 2003 Jun;22(2):150-1. doi: 10.4314/wajm.v22i2.27937.