• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲药品管理局:使命、职责概述及癌症药物监管方面的最新举措。

The European Medicines Agency: an overview of its mission, responsibilities, and recent initiatives in cancer drug regulation.

机构信息

European Medicines Agency, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 15;17(16):5220-5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0623.

DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0623
PMID:21844037
Abstract

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is responsible for the scientific evaluation of medicines developed by pharmaceutical companies for use in the European Union (EU). Since 2005, the agency has become responsible for the approval of all new oncology drugs in the EU. In this article we describe the mission, role, and responsibilities of the EMA, and provide a brief summary of recent initiatives related to cancer drug regulation. The EMA recently published its Road Map to 2015. Over the next 5 years, the agency aims to continue to stimulate drug development in areas of unmet medical needs. Concerning drug safety, one of the priorities over the next few years will be to establish a more proactive approach in ensuring patient safety. This is the result of new EU legislation coming into force in 2012 that will strengthen the way the safety of medicines for human use is monitored in the EU. In terms of its general operation, the agency is committed to increased openness and transparency, and to build on its interactions with stakeholders, including members of academia, health care professionals, patients, and health technology assessment bodies. The agency recently created an oncology working party to expand the current guideline for the development and evaluation of cancer drugs. The guideline focuses on both exploratory and confirmatory studies for different types of agents. The current revision will address a number of topics, including the use of biomarkers as an integrated part of drug development and the use of progression-free survival as a primary endpoint in registration trials.

摘要

欧洲药品管理局(EMA)负责评估制药公司在欧盟(EU)开发的药品的科学价值。自 2005 年以来,该机构已负责批准欧盟所有新的肿瘤药物。本文介绍了 EMA 的使命、角色和责任,并简要总结了最近与癌症药物监管相关的举措。EMA 最近发布了其 2015 年路线图。在未来 5 年内,该机构旨在继续在有未满足医疗需求的领域刺激药物开发。关于药物安全,未来几年的优先事项之一将是建立更积极的方法,以确保患者安全。这是 2012 年生效的新欧盟立法的结果,该立法将加强欧盟对人用药物安全性的监测方式。在其一般运作方面,该机构致力于提高开放性和透明度,并建立在与利益攸关方的互动基础上,包括学术界成员、医疗保健专业人员、患者和卫生技术评估机构。该机构最近成立了一个肿瘤工作组,以扩大当前癌症药物开发和评估的指南。该指南侧重于不同类型药物的探索性和确证性研究。目前的修订将涉及多个主题,包括将生物标志物作为药物开发的一个组成部分,以及将无进展生存期作为注册试验的主要终点。

相似文献

1
The European Medicines Agency: an overview of its mission, responsibilities, and recent initiatives in cancer drug regulation.欧洲药品管理局:使命、职责概述及癌症药物监管方面的最新举措。
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Aug 15;17(16):5220-5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0623.
2
The European Medicines Agency: a public health European agency?欧洲药品管理局:一个欧洲公共卫生机构?
Med Law. 2012 Mar;31(1):25-42.
3
Strengthening and rationalizing pharmacovigilance in the EU: where is Europe heading to? A review of the new EU legislation on pharmacovigilance.加强和合理化欧盟的药物警戒:欧洲将走向何方?对新的欧盟药物警戒立法的审查。
Drug Saf. 2011 Mar 1;34(3):187-97. doi: 10.2165/11586620-000000000-00000.
4
[Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].[德国药品效益评估的程序和方法]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Dec;133 Suppl 7:S225-46. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100954. Epub 2008 Nov 25.
5
Top adviser at the European Medicines Agency quits suddenly.欧洲药品管理局的顶级顾问突然辞职。
BMJ. 2012 Apr 11;344:e2641. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2641.
6
Regulating medicines in Europe: the European Medicines Agency, marketing authorisation, transparency and pharmacovigilance.欧洲的药品监管:欧洲药品管理局、上市许可、透明度与药物警戒
Clin Med (Lond). 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):87-90. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.6-1-87.
7
[European registration of medicines: pros and cons for prescriber and patient].[欧洲药品注册:对开处方者和患者的利弊]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 May 24;141(21):1028-33.
8
Granting marketing authorisation for medicines in South East European countries: the point of view of the authority.在东南欧国家授予药品营销许可:主管当局的观点。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2010 Jul-Aug;57(2-3):325-32. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 Apr 10.
9
How to anticipate the assessment of the public health benefit of new medicines?如何预测对新药公共卫生效益的评估?
Therapie. 2007 Sep-Oct;62(5):427-35. doi: 10.2515/therapie:2007071. Epub 2008 Jan 19.
10
Issues with regulatory pharmacovigilance in East European countries: the industry perspective.东欧国家药品监管中的药物警戒问题:行业视角
Toxicol Lett. 2007 Feb 5;168(3):228-35. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.10.019. Epub 2006 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
The African Medicines Agency and Medicines Regulation: Progress, challenges, and recommendations.非洲药品管理局与药品监管:进展、挑战与建议。
Health Care Sci. 2024 Oct 10;3(5):350-359. doi: 10.1002/hcs2.117. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Early access programs for medicines: comparative analysis among France, Italy, Spain, and UK and focus on the Italian case.药品早期准入计划:法国、意大利、西班牙和英国的比较分析及对意大利案例的关注
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2023 May 17;16(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40545-023-00570-z.
3
Selection of endpoints in breast cancer clinical trials: a qualitative study of key trial stakeholders.
乳腺癌临床试验终点的选择:对关键试验利益相关者的定性研究
Am J Cancer Res. 2022 Dec 15;12(12):5599-5612. eCollection 2022.
4
The value of anticancer drugs - a regulatory view.抗癌药物的价值——监管视角
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar;19(3):207-215. doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00584-z. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
5
Combinations in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced/metastatic renal cell cancer: regulatory aspects.晚期/转移性肾细胞癌患者一线治疗的联合用药:监管方面。
ESMO Open. 2020 Aug;5(4). doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000856.
6
Flexible and Expedited Regulatory Review Processes for Innovative Medicines and Regenerative Medical Products in the US, the EU, and Japan.美国、欧盟和日本创新药物和再生医学产品的灵活和加速监管审查流程。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 3;20(15):3801. doi: 10.3390/ijms20153801.
7
Innovative organotypic in vitro models for safety assessment: aligning with regulatory requirements and understanding models of the heart, skin, and liver as paradigms.创新的器官型体外模型用于安全性评估:与监管要求保持一致,并理解心脏、皮肤和肝脏模型作为范例。
Arch Toxicol. 2018 Feb;92(2):557-569. doi: 10.1007/s00204-018-2152-9. Epub 2018 Jan 23.
8
Challenges in translating endpoints from trials to observational cohort studies in oncology.肿瘤学中从试验终点向观察性队列研究终点转换的挑战。
Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Jun 11;8:195-200. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S97874. eCollection 2016.
9
Regulatory approval pathways for anticancer drugs in Japan, the EU and the US.日本、欧盟和美国抗癌药物的监管审批途径。
Int J Hematol. 2016 Jul;104(1):73-84. doi: 10.1007/s12185-016-2001-7. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
10
Assessment of benefits and risks in development of targeted therapies for cancer--The view of regulatory authorities.癌症靶向治疗研发中的获益与风险评估——监管机构的观点
Mol Oncol. 2015 May;9(5):1034-41. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 16.