Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living (ISEAL), School of Sport and Exercise Science, Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Sports Med. 2011 Sep 1;41(9):741-56. doi: 10.2165/11590560-000000000-00000.
Short-duration sprints, interspersed with brief recoveries, are common during most team sports. The ability to produce the best possible average sprint performance over a series of sprints (≤10 seconds), separated by short (≤60 seconds) recovery periods has been termed repeated-sprint ability (RSA). RSA is therefore an important fitness requirement of team-sport athletes, and it is important to better understand training strategies that can improve this fitness component. Surprisingly, however, there has been little research about the best training methods to improve RSA. In the absence of strong scientific evidence, two principal training theories have emerged. One is based on the concept of training specificity and maintains that the best way to train RSA is to perform repeated sprints. The second proposes that training interventions that target the main factors limiting RSA may be a more effective approach. The aim of this review (Part II) is to critically analyse training strategies to improve both RSA and the underlying factors responsible for fatigue during repeated sprints (see Part I of the preceding companion article). This review has highlighted that there is not one type of training that can be recommended to best improve RSA and all of the factors believed to be responsible for performance decrements during repeated-sprint tasks. This is not surprising, as RSA is a complex fitness component that depends on both metabolic (e.g. oxidative capacity, phosphocreatine recovery and H+ buffering) and neural factors (e.g. muscle activation and recruitment strategies) among others. While different training strategies can be used in order to improve each of these potential limiting factors, and in turn RSA, two key recommendations emerge from this review; it is important to include (i) some training to improve single-sprint performance (e.g. 'traditional' sprint training and strength/power training); and (ii) some high-intensity (80-90% maximal oxygen consumption) interval training to best improve the ability to recover between sprints. Further research is required to establish whether it is best to develop these qualities separately, or whether they can be developed concurrently (without interference effects). While research has identified a correlation between RSA and total sprint distance during soccer, future studies need to address whether training-induced changes in RSA also produce changes in match physical performance.
短时间的冲刺,穿插着短暂的恢复,在大多数团队运动中很常见。在一系列冲刺(≤10 秒)中产生最佳平均冲刺表现的能力,通过短暂(≤60 秒)的恢复期进行分隔,被称为重复冲刺能力(RSA)。因此,RSA 是团队运动运动员的重要身体素质要求,重要的是要更好地理解可以提高这种身体素质的训练策略。然而,令人惊讶的是,关于提高 RSA 的最佳训练方法的研究很少。在缺乏强有力的科学证据的情况下,出现了两种主要的训练理论。一种基于训练特异性的概念,认为训练 RSA 的最佳方法是进行重复冲刺。第二种提出,针对限制 RSA 的主要因素的训练干预可能是一种更有效的方法。本综述(第二部分)的目的是批判性地分析提高 RSA 和重复冲刺时导致疲劳的潜在因素的训练策略(请参见前一篇综述文章的第一部分)。本综述强调,没有一种训练类型可以被推荐来最佳地提高 RSA 和所有被认为对重复冲刺任务表现下降负责的因素。这并不奇怪,因为 RSA 是一种复杂的身体素质成分,取决于代谢因素(例如氧化能力、磷酸肌酸恢复和 H+缓冲)和神经因素(例如肌肉激活和募集策略)等。虽然可以使用不同的训练策略来提高这些潜在限制因素中的每一个,进而提高 RSA,但从本综述中得出了两个关键建议;重要的是要包括(i)一些旨在提高单次冲刺表现的训练(例如“传统”冲刺训练和力量/爆发力训练);和(ii)一些高强度(80-90%最大摄氧量)间歇训练,以最佳地提高在冲刺之间恢复的能力。需要进一步的研究来确定是最好分别发展这些素质,还是可以同时发展(没有干扰效应)。虽然研究已经确定了 RSA 与足球比赛中的总冲刺距离之间存在相关性,但未来的研究需要解决 RSA 的训练诱导变化是否也会导致比赛体能表现的变化。