• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

首发精神病中异常自我体验的检查:评分者间信度。

Examination of anomalous self-experience in first-episode psychosis: interrater reliability.

机构信息

Department of Mental Health Research and Development, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Lier, Norway. paul.moller @ vestreviken.no

出版信息

Psychopathology. 2011;44(6):386-90. doi: 10.1159/000325173. Epub 2011 Aug 17.

DOI:10.1159/000325173
PMID:21847006
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The growing research focus on early detection of schizophrenia has fostered an increasing interest in the nonpsychotic experiential anomalies that may antedate schizophrenia spectrum disorders and assist early differential diagnosis. The Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE) is a phenomenologically inspired checklist, specifically designed to support the comprehensive assessment of these characteristic subjective experiences.

AIM

To assess the interrater reliability of the EASE.

SAMPLING AND METHODS

Twenty-five first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients were interviewed with the EASE. Videotaped interviews were blindly reevaluated. Internal consistency, overall interrater correlation and item interrater agreement (Cohen's kappa) were estimated.

RESULTS

The EASE showed good to excellent internal consistency across the two raters (Cronbach's alpha above 0.87) and an overall inter-rater correlation above 0.80 (Spearman's rho, p < 0.001). The average kappa of the EASE was 0.65, ranging from 0.51 to 0.73 over the 5 domains; kappa values at an item level were very good in 9 items, good in 20 items, moderate in 11 items and fair in 4 items.

CONCLUSION

The EASE provides a reliable and internally consistent clinical tool for the assessment of subjective experience in FEP patients, suggesting that this instrument could usefully supplement standard clinical assessments during the onset phase of psychosis.

摘要

背景

对精神分裂症早期检测的研究日益增多,这促使人们对可能先于精神分裂症谱系障碍出现并有助于早期鉴别诊断的非精神病性体验异常产生了越来越大的兴趣。体验异常检查表(EASE)是一种受现象学启发的检查表,专门用于支持对这些特征性主观体验的全面评估。

目的

评估 EASE 的评分者间信度。

样本和方法

对 25 例首发精神病(FEP)患者进行 EASE 访谈。对录像访谈进行盲法重新评估。评估内部一致性、总体评分者间相关性和项目评分者间一致性(Cohen's kappa)。

结果

EASE 在两位评分者之间表现出良好到优秀的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha 均大于 0.87),总体评分者间相关性大于 0.80(Spearman's rho,p<0.001)。EASE 的平均 kappa 值为 0.65,5 个领域的 kappa 值范围为 0.51 至 0.73;5 个领域中有 9 个项目的 kappa 值为极好,20 个项目的 kappa 值为好,11 个项目的 kappa 值为中等,4 个项目的 kappa 值为一般。

结论

EASE 为评估 FEP 患者的主观体验提供了一种可靠且内部一致的临床工具,表明该工具在精神病发病期可有助于补充标准临床评估。

相似文献

1
Examination of anomalous self-experience in first-episode psychosis: interrater reliability.首发精神病中异常自我体验的检查:评分者间信度。
Psychopathology. 2011;44(6):386-90. doi: 10.1159/000325173. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
2
Reliability of measuring anomalous experience: the Bonn Scale for the Assessment of Basic Symptoms.测量异常体验的可靠性:用于评估基本症状的波恩量表
Psychopathology. 2007;40(5):345-8. doi: 10.1159/000106311. Epub 2007 Jul 24.
3
The diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder and unipolar depression: interrater reliability and congruence between DSM-IV and ICD-10.精神分裂症、分裂情感性障碍、双相情感障碍及单相抑郁症的诊断:评定者间信度以及《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)与《国际疾病分类》第十版(ICD-10)之间的一致性
Psychopathology. 2009;42(5):293-8. doi: 10.1159/000228838. Epub 2009 Jul 16.
4
Detection of early psychotic symptoms: Validation of the Spanish version of the "Symptom Onset in Schizophrenia (SOS) inventory".早期精神病症状的检测:“精神分裂症症状起始(SOS)量表”西班牙语版的验证。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Mar;261:68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.12.035. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
[The Basel Screening Instrument for Psychosis (BSIP): development, structure, reliability and validity].[巴塞尔精神病筛查工具(BSIP):开发、结构、信度和效度]
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2008 Apr;76(4):207-16. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1038155.
6
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
7
Validation and use of the functioning assessment short test in first psychotic episodes.首发精神病性发作中功能评估简短测试的验证与应用
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2010 Nov;198(11):836-40. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181f97bf9.
8
Examination of Anomalous World Experience: A Report on Reliability.异常世界体验的考察:一份关于可靠性的报告。
Psychopathology. 2017;50(1):55-59. doi: 10.1159/000454865. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
9
Anomalous self-experience in adolescents at risk of psychosis. Clinical and conceptual elucidation.青少年精神病风险中的异常自我体验。临床和概念阐明。
Psychopathology. 2009;42(6):361-9. doi: 10.1159/000236907. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
10
[Polydiagnostic approach to schizophrenia. Validation of a computerized checklist (Diagnostic and Prognostic Scales)].[精神分裂症的多诊断方法。计算机化清单(诊断与预后量表)的验证]
Encephale. 1994 Mar-Apr;20(2):91-101.

引用本文的文献

1
Anomalous self-experience in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Phenomenological and psychopathological correlates.精神分裂症谱系障碍中的异常自我体验:现象学与精神病理学关联
Schizophr Res Cogn. 2025 Aug 30;42:100389. doi: 10.1016/j.scog.2025.100389. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Poor insight and self-disorders in schizophrenia: an empirical study.精神分裂症中的自知力缺乏与自我障碍:一项实证研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s00406-025-02035-7.
3
The influence of mood and social relationships on the intensity of basic self-disturbance: an experience sampling method investigation.
情绪和社会关系对基本自我干扰强度的影响:一项经验取样法调查
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 8;16:1514351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1514351. eCollection 2025.
4
Basic self-disturbance in adolescents at risk of psychosis: temporal stability investigated by the experience sampling method in a mixed method study.青少年精神病风险中的基本自我干扰:混合方法研究中通过经验采样法研究的时间稳定性。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Oct 31;27(1):e301209. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301209.
5
Personality functioning and self-disorders in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, with first-episode psychosis and with borderline personality disorder.处于精神病超高风险期、首发精神病期以及患有边缘型人格障碍的个体的人格功能与自我障碍。
BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 11;9(5):e150. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.530.
6
Linguistic markers and basic self-disturbances among adolescents at risk of psychosis. A qualitative study.有精神病风险的青少年的语言标记和基本自我障碍。一项定性研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Nov 12;55:101733. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101733. eCollection 2023 Jan.
7
The lived experience of psychosis: a bottom-up review co-written by experts by experience and academics.精神病的亲身经历:由有亲身经历的专家和学者共同撰写的自下而上的综述。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):168-188. doi: 10.1002/wps.20959.
8
Anomalies of Imagination, Self-Disorders, and Schizophrenia Spectrum Psychopathology: A Network Analysis.想象异常、自我障碍与精神分裂症谱系精神病理学:一项网络分析
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 17;12:808009. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.808009. eCollection 2021.
9
Prevalence and assessment of self-disorders in the schizophrenia spectrum: a systematic review and meta-analysis.精神分裂症谱系中自我障碍的患病率及评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 21;12(1):1165. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05232-9.
10
Basic self-disturbance trajectories in clinical high risk for psychosis: a one-year follow-up study.临床精神病高危人群的基本自我干扰轨迹:一项为期一年的随访研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Sep;272(6):1007-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01349-6. Epub 2021 Nov 16.