• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青少年精神病风险中的基本自我干扰:混合方法研究中通过经验采样法研究的时间稳定性。

Basic self-disturbance in adolescents at risk of psychosis: temporal stability investigated by the experience sampling method in a mixed method study.

机构信息

Department of Mental Health Research and Development, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Drammen, Norway

University of Oslo Faculty of Medicine, Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Oct 31;27(1):e301209. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301209.

DOI:10.1136/bmjment-2024-301209
PMID:39486806
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11529470/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Basic self-disturbance (BSD), also called anomalous self-experiences (ASEs), are core phenotypic markers for schizophrenia spectrum disorders and a prepsychotic vulnerability marker considered to be temporally stable (trait-phenomenon). Studies of BSD in children and adolescents are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To be clinically useful, we need to know more about the characteristics and temporal development of BSD in prepsychotic phases.

METHOD

This study used a smartphone application measuring the occurrence and subjective intensity of ASEs in the daily life of 27 help-seeking adolescents (12-18 years) repeatedly over a period of 6 months. A total of 5223 unique application-reports based on individually selected and verbatim descriptions of personal core ASEs were analysed by mixed methods.

FINDINGS

The intensity of ASEs, within subjects and between subjects and irrespective of time intervals or baseline scores obtained by the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE) were relatively stable with a mean variability of 1.25 (0.4) SD. Participants with low EASE total scores at baseline had a significantly lower score on ASE intensity than those with high baseline EASE total scores at baseline (mean 2.42 vs 3.42, p=0.046).

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

In this study, ASEs were not reported as essentially fluctuating experiences but as almost constantly present, demonstrating BSD as a mainly trait phenomenon in prepsychotic phases in persons under the age of 18. Considering the continuous experience of BSD and its predictive value for psychosis development, ASEs should be targeted and monitored to the same extent as other prepsychotic features.

摘要

背景

基本自我扰动(BSD),也称为异常自我体验(ASEs),是精神分裂症谱系障碍的核心表型标志物,也是被认为具有时间稳定性(特质现象)的前精神病易感性标志物。目前缺乏儿童和青少年 BSD 的研究。

目的

为了具有临床应用价值,我们需要更多地了解前精神病阶段 BSD 的特征和时间发展。

方法

本研究使用智能手机应用程序,在 6 个月的时间内,反复多次测量 27 名寻求帮助的青少年(12-18 岁)日常生活中 ASEs 的发生和主观强度。共分析了 5223 份基于个人选择和逐字描述个人核心 ASE 的独特应用报告,采用混合方法。

结果

ASEs 的强度,无论是在个体内部还是在个体之间,以及无论时间间隔或通过异常自我体验检查(EASE)获得的基线分数如何,都具有相对稳定性,平均变异系数为 1.25(0.4)SD。基线 EASE 总分较低的参与者的 ASE 强度得分显著低于基线 EASE 总分较高的参与者(均值 2.42 比 3.42,p=0.046)。

结论和临床意义

在这项研究中,ASEs 不是作为本质上波动的体验来报告,而是作为几乎一直存在的体验来报告,这表明 BSD 是 18 岁以下前精神病阶段的主要特质现象。考虑到 BSD 的持续体验及其对精神病发展的预测价值,应该像监测其他前精神病特征一样,对 ASEs 进行靶向监测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb84/11529470/2c5773466d91/bmjment-27-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb84/11529470/2c5773466d91/bmjment-27-1-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb84/11529470/2c5773466d91/bmjment-27-1-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Basic self-disturbance in adolescents at risk of psychosis: temporal stability investigated by the experience sampling method in a mixed method study.青少年精神病风险中的基本自我干扰:混合方法研究中通过经验采样法研究的时间稳定性。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Oct 31;27(1):e301209. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301209.
2
Anomalous Self-Experiences: Markers of Schizophrenia Vulnerability or Symptoms of Depersonalization Disorder? A Phenomenological Investigation of Two Cases.异常的自我体验:精神分裂症易感性的标志物还是人格解体障碍的症状?对两例病例的现象学研究。
Psychopathology. 2018;51(3):198-209. doi: 10.1159/000488462. Epub 2018 May 4.
3
Anomalous self-experiences and neurocognitive functioning in adolescents at risk for psychosis: Still no significant associations found between these two vulnerability markers.青少年精神病高危人群中的异常自我体验与神经认知功能:这两个易感性标志物之间仍未发现显著关联。
Compr Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;125:152400. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152400. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
4
Basic self-disturbance predicts psychosis onset in the ultra high risk for psychosis "prodromal" population.基本的自我扰乱可预测精神病高危“前驱”人群的精神病发病。
Schizophr Bull. 2012 Nov;38(6):1277-87. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs007. Epub 2012 Feb 20.
5
Developmental vulnerability to psychosis: Selective aggregation of basic self-disturbance in early onset schizophrenia.精神分裂症早期发病的发展脆弱性:基本自我干扰的选择性聚集。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Nov;201:367-372. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 25.
6
Anomalous self-experiences are strongly associated with negative symptoms in a clinical high-risk for psychosis sample.异常的自我体验与精神病高危临床样本中的阴性症状密切相关。
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;93:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
7
Basic self-disturbance trajectories in clinical high risk for psychosis: a one-year follow-up study.临床精神病高危人群的基本自我干扰轨迹:一项为期一年的随访研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Sep;272(6):1007-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01349-6. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
8
Basic self-disturbance in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis: Relationship with clinical and functional outcomes at one year follow-up.临床精神病高危人群的基本自我干扰:与一年随访时的临床和功能结局的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Jun;300:113942. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113942. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
9
Anomalous self-experiences (ASE) in relation to clinical high risk for psychosis (CHRP), childhood trauma and general psychopathology among adolescent and young adult help seekers.青少年和青年求助者中与精神病高危(CHRP)、儿童期创伤和一般精神病理学有关的异常自我体验(ASE)。
Schizophr Res. 2021 Nov;237:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
10
Disturbances of basic self and prodromal symptoms among non-psychotic help-seeking adolescents.非精神病性求助青少年的基本自我障碍和前驱症状。
Psychol Med. 2013 Jul;43(7):1365-76. doi: 10.1017/S0033291712002322. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
The neurophenomenology of basic self-disturbance in early psychosis: Association with clinical outcome in an ultra-high risk sample.早期精神病中基本自我障碍的神经现象学:超高风险样本中与临床结局的关联。
Australas Psychiatry. 2025 Aug;33(4):736-741. doi: 10.1177/10398562251346619. Epub 2025 Jun 4.
2
"Schizophrenia, Consciousness, and the Self" Twenty Years Later: Revisiting the Ipseity-Disturbance Model and the Developmental Nature of Self-Disorder in the Schizophrenia Spectrum.《精神分裂症、意识与自我》二十年后:重新审视自我紊乱模型以及精神分裂症谱系中自我障碍的发展本质
Schizophr Bull. 2025 Sep 8;51(5):1187-1192. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaf071.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Measurement reactivity in ambulatory assessment: Increase in emotional clarity over time independent of sampling frequency.动态评估中的测量反应性:随着时间的推移,情绪清晰度的增加与采样频率无关。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):6150-6164. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02346-y. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
2
Linguistic markers and basic self-disturbances among adolescents at risk of psychosis. A qualitative study.有精神病风险的青少年的语言标记和基本自我障碍。一项定性研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Nov 12;55:101733. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101733. eCollection 2023 Jan.
3
A mixed-method investigation into measurement reactivity to the experience sampling method: The role of sampling protocol and individual characteristics.
The influence of mood and social relationships on the intensity of basic self-disturbance: an experience sampling method investigation.
情绪和社会关系对基本自我干扰强度的影响:一项经验取样法调查
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 8;16:1514351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1514351. eCollection 2025.
对经验取样法测量反应性的混合方法研究:抽样方案和个体特征的作用。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Jan;35(1):68-81. doi: 10.1037/pas0001177. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
4
Are Self-disorders in Schizophrenia Expressive of a Unifying Disturbance of Subjectivity: A Factor Analytic Approach.精神分裂症中的自我障碍是否表达了一种统一的主体性障碍:一种因素分析方法。
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Jan 3;49(1):144-150. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbac123.
5
Disorder of Selfhood in Schizophrenia: A Symptom or a Gestalt?精神分裂症中的自我认同障碍:是一种症状还是一种整体表现?
Psychopathology. 2022;55(5):273-281. doi: 10.1159/000524100. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
6
Self-disorders and psychopathology: a systematic review.自我障碍与精神病理学:系统综述。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;8(11):1001-1012. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00097-3.
7
Social comparisons and social anxiety in daily life: An experience-sampling approach.日常生活中的社会比较和社交焦虑:一种经验取样研究方法。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2021 Jul;130(5):468-489. doi: 10.1037/abn0000671.
8
Basic self-disorders in adolescence predict schizophrenia spectrum disorders in young adulthood: A 7-year follow-up study among non-psychotic help-seeking adolescents.青少年基本自我障碍预示着青年期精神分裂谱系障碍:一项针对非精神病性求助青少年的 7 年随访研究。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Feb;216:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.12.022. Epub 2019 Dec 27.
9
Anomalous self-experiences are strongly associated with negative symptoms in a clinical high-risk for psychosis sample.异常的自我体验与精神病高危临床样本中的阴性症状密切相关。
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;93:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
10
Stability in basic self-disturbances and diagnosis in a first treated psychosis: A seven year follow-up study.首发精神病治疗后基本自我紊乱的稳定性和诊断:一项为期七年的随访研究。
Schizophr Res. 2018 Dec;202:274-280. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.07.011. Epub 2018 Jul 11.