• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情绪和社会关系对基本自我干扰强度的影响:一项经验取样法调查

The influence of mood and social relationships on the intensity of basic self-disturbance: an experience sampling method investigation.

作者信息

Baklund Lise, Røssberg Jan Ivar, Melbye Sigurd Arne, Pesonen Henri, Møller Paul

机构信息

Department of Mental Health Research and Development, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Vestre Viken, Drammen, Norway.

Oslo University Hospital Division of Mental Health and Addiction University of Oslo, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 8;16:1514351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1514351. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1514351
PMID:40303448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12039760/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Basic self-disturbance (BSD), the overarching concept of various experiences of self-alienation, referred to as anomalous self-experiences (ASEs), is considered a relatively stable clinical marker for the potential development of schizophrenia spectrum disorders. However, research on BSD in children and adolescents in the pre-psychotic phase is limited. Research on individuals at risk for psychosis shows that psychosocial factors are critical in psychosis development, but studies of these factors and the relationship between psychosocial factors and the severity of ASEs are lacking. The present study aims to investigate the extent to which mood, social relationships, and psychosocial factors contribute to the development of BSD in adolescents at risk for psychosis.

METHODS

We used the experience sampling method to collect real-time data from 27 help-seeking 12- to 19-year-old adolescents. We analyzed data from daily registrations on a smartphone app, measuring the intensity of BSD, mood, and social settings over various time periods (hourly, daily, and weekly over 6 months) by linear mixed regression modeling.

RESULTS

Negative emotions were positively associated with the mean ASE scores (β = 0.30, 95% CI = (0.26, 0.34), whereas for the positive emotions, the contrast of the association was significantly negative [β = -0.57, 95% CI = (-0.63, -0.51)]. The effect of being alone at the time of the response on the intensity of ASEs compared to being with others was significantly positive [β = 0.27, 95% CI = (0.08, - 0.46)]. However, this effect was observed only when not being at home, as indicated by the effect of being at home [β = -0.04, 95% CI = (-0.09, 0.11)] compared to not being at home and the interaction between the two social context variables [β = -0.20, 95% CI = (-0.44, -0.04)].

CONCLUSIONS

Mood and social settings appear to be influencing factors in the expression and intensity of ASEs. These factors should be addressed in the clinical approach to BSD, and further studies investigating the influence of various psychosocial factors on BSD experiences should be conducted.

摘要

背景

基本自我干扰(BSD)是各种自我异化体验的总体概念,被称为异常自我体验(ASEs),被认为是精神分裂症谱系障碍潜在发展的一个相对稳定的临床标志物。然而,关于精神病前期儿童和青少年的BSD研究有限。对有精神病风险个体的研究表明,社会心理因素在精神病发展中至关重要,但缺乏对这些因素以及社会心理因素与ASEs严重程度之间关系的研究。本研究旨在调查情绪、社会关系和社会心理因素在多大程度上促成有精神病风险的青少年BSD的发展。

方法

我们采用经验取样法,从27名寻求帮助的12至19岁青少年中收集实时数据。我们通过线性混合回归模型分析了智能手机应用程序上每日记录的数据,测量了不同时间段(6个月内每小时、每日和每周)的BSD强度、情绪和社会环境。

结果

消极情绪与ASEs平均得分呈正相关(β = 0.30,95%可信区间 = (0.26, 0.34)),而对于积极情绪,这种关联的对比显著为负[β = -0.57,95%可信区间 = (-0.63, -0.51)]。与他人在一起时相比,回应时独处对ASEs强度的影响显著为正[β = 0.27,95%可信区间 = (0.08, - 0.46)]。然而,只有不在家时才观察到这种影响,这由在家与不在家的影响[β = -0.04,95%可信区间 = (-0.09, 0.11)]以及两个社会环境变量之间的相互作用[β = -0.20,95%可信区间 = (-0.44, -0.04)]表明。

结论

情绪和社会环境似乎是ASEs表达和强度的影响因素。在BSD的临床治疗中应考虑这些因素,并且应该进行进一步研究以调查各种社会心理因素对BSD体验的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4647/12039760/fac6aefcd411/fpsyt-16-1514351-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4647/12039760/8e40338266e9/fpsyt-16-1514351-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4647/12039760/fac6aefcd411/fpsyt-16-1514351-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4647/12039760/8e40338266e9/fpsyt-16-1514351-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4647/12039760/fac6aefcd411/fpsyt-16-1514351-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
The influence of mood and social relationships on the intensity of basic self-disturbance: an experience sampling method investigation.情绪和社会关系对基本自我干扰强度的影响:一项经验取样法调查
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 8;16:1514351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1514351. eCollection 2025.
2
Basic self-disturbance in adolescents at risk of psychosis: temporal stability investigated by the experience sampling method in a mixed method study.青少年精神病风险中的基本自我干扰:混合方法研究中通过经验采样法研究的时间稳定性。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Oct 31;27(1):e301209. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301209.
3
Anomalous Self-Experiences: Markers of Schizophrenia Vulnerability or Symptoms of Depersonalization Disorder? A Phenomenological Investigation of Two Cases.异常的自我体验:精神分裂症易感性的标志物还是人格解体障碍的症状?对两例病例的现象学研究。
Psychopathology. 2018;51(3):198-209. doi: 10.1159/000488462. Epub 2018 May 4.
4
Basic self-disturbance trajectories in clinical high risk for psychosis: a one-year follow-up study.临床精神病高危人群的基本自我干扰轨迹:一项为期一年的随访研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Sep;272(6):1007-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01349-6. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
5
Basic self-disturbance in subjects at clinical high risk for psychosis: Relationship with clinical and functional outcomes at one year follow-up.临床精神病高危人群的基本自我干扰:与一年随访时的临床和功能结局的关系。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Jun;300:113942. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113942. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
6
Anomalous self-experiences (ASE) in relation to clinical high risk for psychosis (CHRP), childhood trauma and general psychopathology among adolescent and young adult help seekers.青少年和青年求助者中与精神病高危(CHRP)、儿童期创伤和一般精神病理学有关的异常自我体验(ASE)。
Schizophr Res. 2021 Nov;237:182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2021.09.009. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
7
Anomalous self-experiences and neurocognitive functioning in adolescents at risk for psychosis: Still no significant associations found between these two vulnerability markers.青少年精神病高危人群中的异常自我体验与神经认知功能:这两个易感性标志物之间仍未发现显著关联。
Compr Psychiatry. 2023 Aug;125:152400. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2023.152400. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
8
Differential Expression of Anomalous Self-Experiences in Spontaneous Speech in Clinical High-Risk and Early-Course Psychosis Quantified by Natural Language Processing.通过自然语言处理对临床高危和早期精神病患者自发言语中异常自我体验的差异表达进行定量分析。
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023 Oct;8(10):1005-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.06.007. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
9
Anomalous self-experiences are strongly associated with negative symptoms in a clinical high-risk for psychosis sample.异常的自我体验与精神病高危临床样本中的阴性症状密切相关。
Compr Psychiatry. 2019 Aug;93:65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
10
Anomalous Self-Experiences and positive symptoms are independently associated with emotion processing deficits in schizophrenia.异常自我体验和阳性症状与精神分裂症患者的情绪加工缺陷独立相关。
Schizophr Res. 2016 Oct;176(2-3):456-461. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Aug 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Basic self-disturbance in adolescents at risk of psychosis: temporal stability investigated by the experience sampling method in a mixed method study.青少年精神病风险中的基本自我干扰:混合方法研究中通过经验采样法研究的时间稳定性。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Oct 31;27(1):e301209. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301209.
2
Psychosocial stress, interpersonal sensitivity, and social withdrawal in clinical high risk for psychosis: a systematic review.精神病临床高危人群中的心理社会应激、人际敏感性和社交退缩:一项系统评价
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2023 Jun 17;9(1):38. doi: 10.1038/s41537-023-00362-z.
3
Environmental context predicts state fluctuations in negative symptoms in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis.
环境背景可预测处于精神病高危状态的青年负性症状的状态波动。
Psychol Med. 2023 Dec;53(16):7609-7618. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723001393. Epub 2023 May 29.
4
Linguistic markers and basic self-disturbances among adolescents at risk of psychosis. A qualitative study.有精神病风险的青少年的语言标记和基本自我障碍。一项定性研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Nov 12;55:101733. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101733. eCollection 2023 Jan.
5
Benefits of Social Contact in Individuals With Psychotic Symptoms: Do Closeness of the Contact and Empathic Skills Make the Difference?有精神病症状个体的社交接触益处:接触的亲密程度和共情能力会产生影响吗?
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:769091. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769091. eCollection 2021.
6
Statistical Considerations for Analyzing Ecological Momentary Assessment Data.分析生态瞬时评估数据的统计考虑。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jan 12;65(1):344-360. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00081. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
7
Basic self-disturbance trajectories in clinical high risk for psychosis: a one-year follow-up study.临床精神病高危人群的基本自我干扰轨迹:一项为期一年的随访研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Sep;272(6):1007-1019. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01349-6. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
8
Self-disorders and psychopathology: a systematic review.自我障碍与精神病理学:系统综述。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Nov;8(11):1001-1012. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00097-3.
9
Social isolation and psychosis: an investigation of social interactions and paranoia in daily life.社会隔离与精神病:日常生活中社会互动与妄想的研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Feb;272(1):119-127. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01278-4. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
10
'The schizophrenic basic mood (self-disorder)', by Hans W Gruhle (1929).《精神分裂症的基本情绪(自我紊乱)》,作者汉斯·W·格鲁勒(1929年)
Hist Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;31(3):364-375. doi: 10.1177/0957154X20915147. Epub 2020 Apr 20.