Suppr超能文献

骨愈合中的电刺激:通过评估证据水平进行批判性分析。

Electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence.

作者信息

Griffin Michelle, Bayat Ardeshir

出版信息

Eplasty. 2011;11:e34. Epub 2011 Jul 26.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Direct current, capacitive coupling, and inductive coupling are modes of electrical stimulation (ES) used to enhance bone healing. It is important to assess the effectiveness of ES for bone healing to ensure optimization for clinical practice. This review aims to examine the level of evidence (LOE) for the application of ES to enhance bone healing and investigate the proposed mechanism for its stimulatory effect.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE searches were conducted to identify clinical and in vitro studies utilizing ES for bone healing since 1959. A total of 105 clinical studies and 35 in vitro studies were evaluated. Clinical studies were assigned LOE according to Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (LOE-1, highest; LOE-5, lowest).

RESULTS

Direct current was found to be effective in enhancing bone healing in spinal fusion but only LOE-4 supported its use for nonunions. Eleven studies were retrieved for capacitive coupling with LOE-1 demonstrating its effectiveness for treating nonunions. The majority of studies utilized inductive coupling with LOE-1 supporting its application for healing osteotomies and nonunions. In vitro studies demonstrate that ES enhances bone healing by changes in growth factors and transmembrane signaling although no clear mechanism has been defined.

CONCLUSION

Overall, the studies, although in favor of ES application in bone repair, displayed variability in treatment regime, primary outcome measures, follow-up times, and study design, making critical evaluation and assessment difficult. Electrical stimulation shows promise in enhancement of bone healing; however, better-designed clinical studies will enable the optimization for clinical practice.

摘要

目的

直流电、电容耦合和电感耦合是用于促进骨愈合的电刺激(ES)模式。评估ES促进骨愈合的有效性对于确保临床实践的优化非常重要。本综述旨在研究应用ES促进骨愈合的证据水平(LOE),并探讨其刺激作用的潜在机制。

方法

对MEDLINE和EMBASE进行检索,以确定自1959年以来利用ES促进骨愈合的临床和体外研究。共评估了105项临床研究和35项体外研究。临床研究根据牛津循证医学中心进行证据水平分类(LOE-1,最高;LOE-5,最低)。

结果

发现直流电在增强脊柱融合中的骨愈合方面有效,但只有证据水平为4支持其用于治疗骨不连。检索到11项关于电容耦合的研究,证据水平为1表明其对治疗骨不连有效。大多数研究采用电感耦合,证据水平为1支持其用于治疗截骨术和骨不连。体外研究表明,ES通过生长因子和跨膜信号的变化促进骨愈合,尽管尚未明确具体机制。

结论

总体而言,这些研究虽然支持ES在骨修复中的应用,但在治疗方案、主要结局指标、随访时间和研究设计方面存在差异,使得关键评估和评价变得困难。电刺激在促进骨愈合方面显示出前景;然而,设计更完善的临床研究将有助于临床实践的优化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d80d/3145421/56dc8262e236/eplasty11e034_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验