Unidade de Cuidados Intensivos Polivalente, Hospital de Santo António dos Capuchos, E.P.E, 1150-069, Lisbon, Portugal.
Intensive Care Med. 2011 Nov;37(11):1765-72. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2334-x. Epub 2011 Aug 17.
Corticosteroids have been proposed to decrease morbidity and mortality in patients with septic shock. An impact on morbidity should be anticipated to be earlier and more easily detected than the impact on mortality.
Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock for <72 h who underwent a short high-dose ACTH test in 52 centers in 9 European countries. Patients received 11-day treatment with hydrocortisone or placebo. Organ dysfunction/failure was quantified by the use of the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score.
From March 2002 to November 2005, 499 patients were enrolled (hydrocortisone 251, placebo 248). Both groups presented a similar SOFA score at baseline (hydrocortisone 10.8 ± 3.2 vs. placebo 10.7 ± 3.1 points). There was no difference in 28-day mortality between the two treatment groups (hydrocortisone 34.3% vs. placebo 31.5%). There was a decrease in the SOFA score of hydrocortisone-treated patients from day 0 to day 7 compared to the placebo-treated patients (p = 0.0027), driven by an improvement in cardiovascular organ dysfunction/failure (p = 0.0005) and in liver failure (p < 0.0001) in the hydrocortisone-treated patients.
Patients randomized to treatment with hydrocortisone demonstrated a faster decrease in total organ dysfunction/failure determined by the SOFA score, primarily driven by a faster improvement in cardiovascular organ dysfunction/failure. This organ dysfunction/failure improvement was not accompanied by a decreased mortality.
皮质类固醇被认为可以降低败血症性休克患者的发病率和死亡率。预计对发病率的影响会比死亡率更早且更容易检测到。
在 9 个欧洲国家的 52 个中心进行了一项为期 28 天的、针对败血症性休克患者(发病时间<72 小时)的死亡率的前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。这些患者接受了为期 11 天的氢化可的松或安慰剂治疗。通过序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分来量化器官功能障碍/衰竭。
2002 年 3 月至 2005 年 11 月,共纳入 499 例患者(氢化可的松 251 例,安慰剂 248 例)。两组患者的基线 SOFA 评分相似(氢化可的松 10.8 ± 3.2 分 vs. 安慰剂 10.7 ± 3.1 分)。两组 28 天死亡率无差异(氢化可的松 34.3% vs. 安慰剂 31.5%)。与安慰剂组相比,氢化可的松组患者的 SOFA 评分从第 0 天到第 7 天下降(p = 0.0027),主要是由于心血管器官功能障碍/衰竭的改善(p = 0.0005)和肝功能衰竭(p < 0.0001)的改善。
接受氢化可的松治疗的患者的总器官功能障碍/衰竭评分下降更快,主要是由于心血管器官功能障碍/衰竭的改善更快。这种器官功能障碍/衰竭的改善并未导致死亡率降低。