Unit of Gastrointestinal and Serological Research, Department of Microbiological Surveillance and Research, Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e22823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022823. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
E. coli belonging to the phylogenetic group B2 are linked to Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). Studies have shown that antimicrobials have some effect in the treatment of IBD, and it has been demonstrated that E. coli Nissle has prophylactic abilities comparable to 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) therapy in ulcerative colitis. The objective of this study was to test if ciprofloxacin and/or E. coli Nissle could eradicate IBD associated E. coli in the streptomycin-treated mouse intestine.
After successful colonization with the IBD associated E. coli strains in mice the introduction of E. coli Nissle did not result in eradication of either IBD associated strains or an E. coli from a healthy control, instead, co-colonization at high levels were obtained. Treatment of mice, precolonized with IBD associated E. coli, with ciprofloxacin for three days alone apparently resulted in effective eradication of tested E. coli. However, treatment of precolonized mice with a combination of ciprofloxacin for 3 days followed by E. coli Nissle surprisingly allowed one IBD associated E. coli to re-colonize the mouse intestine, but at a level 3 logs under E. coli Nissle. A prolonged treatment with ciprofloxacin for 7 days did not change this outcome.
In the mouse model E. coli Nissle can not be used alone to eradicate IBD associated E. coli; rather, 3 days of ciprofloxacin are apparently efficient in eradicating these strains, but surprisingly, after ciprofloxacin treatment (3 or 7 days), the introduction of E. coli Nissle may support re-colonization with IBD associated E. coli.
属于 B2 进化群的大肠杆菌与炎症性肠病(IBD)有关。研究表明,抗生素在 IBD 的治疗中有一定效果,并且已经证明大肠杆菌 Nissle 在溃疡性结肠炎中的预防能力可与 5-氨基水杨酸(5-ASA)疗法相媲美。本研究旨在测试环丙沙星和/或大肠杆菌 Nissle 是否可以清除链霉素处理的小鼠肠道中与 IBD 相关的大肠杆菌。
在成功用与 IBD 相关的大肠杆菌菌株对小鼠进行定植后,引入大肠杆菌 Nissle 并未导致任何与 IBD 相关的菌株或来自健康对照的菌株被根除,而是获得了高水平的共同定植。用环丙沙星单独治疗定植有与 IBD 相关的大肠杆菌的小鼠三天,显然会有效根除测试的大肠杆菌。然而,用环丙沙星治疗定植有与 IBD 相关的大肠杆菌的小鼠 3 天,然后再用大肠杆菌 Nissle 治疗,令人惊讶的是,允许一种与 IBD 相关的大肠杆菌重新定植于小鼠肠道,但水平比大肠杆菌 Nissle 低 3 个对数级。用环丙沙星延长治疗 7 天并没有改变这种结果。
在小鼠模型中,大肠杆菌 Nissle 不能单独用于根除与 IBD 相关的大肠杆菌;相反,3 天的环丙沙星显然可以有效地根除这些菌株,但令人惊讶的是,在用环丙沙星治疗(3 或 7 天)后,引入大肠杆菌 Nissle 可能会支持与 IBD 相关的大肠杆菌重新定植。