Suppr超能文献

非球面与球面人工晶状体的像差和对比敏感度比较。

Comparison of optical aberrations and contrast sensitivity between aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses.

机构信息

Universidade de Brasilia, Brasilia, Brazil.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2011 Oct;27(10):723-8. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20110708-02. Epub 2011 Aug 19.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare visual acuity, aberrometry, and contrast sensitivity in patients who had a spherical intraocular lens (IOL) (SoFlex SE, Bausch & Lomb) implanted in one eye and an aspheric IOL (SofPort AO, Bausch & Lomb) implanted in the fellow eye during uncomplicated cataract surgery.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter, double-blind study was performed. Forty patients (80 eyes) underwent bilateral phacoemulsification with implantation of a spherical IOL in one eye and an aspheric IOL in the fellow eye. Postoperatively, visual acuity, aberrometry, and contrast sensitivity tests were performed. Statistical analyses were performed using Student t and Wilcoxon tests, and mixed effects were used for each contrast condition situation.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (30 women, 9 men; 78 eyes) with a mean age of 69.3±6.17 years (range: 51 to 82 years) completed the study. No statistical differences were found regarding visual acuity among eyes. Lower levels of higher order aberrations were achieved in the aspheric group. No statistical difference between groups under photopic conditions was noted. In low spatial frequencies, better performance was observed with the aspheric IOL under mesopic conditions. In high spatial frequencies, the spherical IOL produced better quality of vision. Comparing mesopic conditions with glare, visual performance was statistically better using the aspheric IOL.

CONCLUSIONS

Cataract surgery results cannot be measured by means of visual acuity alone. Quality of vision must be considered, and implantation of IOLs with low levels of spherical aberrations and better contrast sensitivity are preferred. In this study, the aspheric IOL demonstrated better visual function, especially at night, when compared with spherical IOLs.

摘要

目的

比较白内障超声乳化吸除术后单眼植入球面人工晶状体(SoFlex SE,Bausch & Lomb),对侧眼植入非球面人工晶状体(SofPort AO,Bausch & Lomb)的患者的视力、像差和对比敏感度。

方法

进行前瞻性、多中心、双盲研究。40 例(80 只眼)患者接受双眼白内障超声乳化吸除术,其中一眼植入球面人工晶状体,对侧眼植入非球面人工晶状体。术后进行视力、像差和对比敏感度检查。采用 Student t 检验和 Wilcoxon 检验进行统计学分析,对于每种对比条件情况采用混合效应模型。

结果

39 例(30 名女性,9 名男性;78 只眼)患者完成研究,平均年龄 69.3±6.17 岁(范围:51 至 82 岁)。各组间视力无统计学差异。非球面组高阶像差水平较低。在明视条件下,两组间无统计学差异。在低空间频率下,非球面人工晶状体在中视条件下表现更好。在高空间频率下,球面人工晶状体产生更好的视觉质量。与眩光相比,在中视条件下,使用非球面人工晶状体可获得更好的视觉效果。

结论

白内障手术的结果不能仅通过视力来衡量。必须考虑视觉质量,植入低球差和具有更好对比敏感度的人工晶状体更受欢迎。在这项研究中,与球面人工晶状体相比,非球面人工晶状体在夜间显示出更好的视觉功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验