Nanavaty Mayank A, Spalton David J, Boyce James, Saha Shouvik, Marshall John
Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Apr;35(4):663-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.12.011.
To compare wavefront aberration, depth of focus, contrast sensitivity, and in vivo modulation transfer function (MTF) after fellow-eye implantation of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses (IOLs).
Department of Ophthalmology, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
This prospective randomized controlled study comprised patients with bilateral cataract who received an aspheric AcrySof SN60WF IOL or a spherical AcrySof SN60AT IOL in the first eye and the other IOL in the second eye. Assessments at 3 and 6 months included 100% and 9% logMAR best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and photopic and mesopic functional acuity contrast testing. Total internal and corneal aberrations and depth of focus were computed. Distance-corrected near logMAR acuity was available at 12 months.
At 3 and 6 months, there was no significant difference in 100% and 9% BCVA or photopic contrast sensitivity. Mesopic contrast sensitivity was better and total and internal spherical aberrations were significantly less with the aspheric IOL. Total and internal eye vertical coma was reduced with aspheric IOL. Total MTF was not significantly different between groups. The aspheric IOL group had 0.46 diopter less depth of focus than the spherical IOL group at 6 months (P<.05). Distance-corrected near acuity was significantly better with the spherical IOL.
Aspheric IOLs significantly reduced spherical aberration, improving mesopic contrast sensitivity. Vertical coma was reduced with aspheric IOLs. Reduction of aberrations may be responsible for reduced depth of focus with aspheric IOLs. This may be disadvantageous for near vision and reading ability.
比较非球面和球面人工晶状体(IOL)植入对侧眼后波前像差、焦深、对比敏感度及活体调制传递函数(MTF)。
英国伦敦圣托马斯医院眼科。
这项前瞻性随机对照研究纳入双眼白内障患者,第一只眼植入非球面AcrySof SN60WF IOL或球面AcrySof SN60AT IOL,第二只眼植入另一种IOL。在3个月和6个月时进行评估,包括100%和9% logMAR最佳矫正视力(BCVA)以及明视觉和暗视觉功能视力对比测试。计算全眼内部和角膜像差以及焦深。12个月时可获得距离矫正近视力logMAR。
在3个月和6个月时,100%和9% BCVA或明视觉对比敏感度无显著差异。非球面IOL的暗视觉对比敏感度更好,全眼和内部球差显著更小。非球面IOL使全眼和内部眼垂直彗差降低。两组间总MTF无显著差异。非球面IOL组在6个月时的焦深比球面IOL组小0.46屈光度(P<0.05)。球面IOL的距离矫正近视力显著更好。
非球面IOL显著降低球差,提高暗视觉对比敏感度。非球面IOL使垂直彗差降低。像差的减少可能是导致非球面IOL焦深降低的原因。这可能对近视力和阅读能力不利。