Wang Kun-Teng, Lin Chia-Pei, Fang Yi-Ya, Kao Ming-Hui, Shih Daniel Yang-Chih, Lo Chi-Fang, Wang Der-Yuan
Section of Biologics, Division of Research and Analysis, Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, ROC.
Division of Research and Analysis, Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan, ROC.
J Food Drug Anal. 2013 Oct 6;22(2):279-284. doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2013.09.011. eCollection 2014.
The pandemic influenza A/H1N1 outbreak resulted in 18,449 deaths in over 214 countries. In Taiwan, the influenza rapid test, an diagnostic device (Flu-IVD), only requires documented reviews for market approval by the Taiwan Food and Drug Administration. The purpose of this study was to investigate the analytical sensitivity and specificity of Flu-IVDs used in Taiwan. Analytical sensitivity and specificity tests were performed for influenza antigens A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) virus, A/Victoria/210/2009 (H3N2) virus, B/ Brisbane/60/08 virus, and human coronavirus OC43. A total of seven domestic and 31 imported Flu-IVD samples were collected, of which, 20 samples had inadequate labeling, including those with removed package inserts or incorrect insert information. The analytical sensitivity of Flu-IVDs for A/H1N1, A/H3N2, and Flu B was 500-1000 ng/mL, 1000 ng/mL, and 1000 ng/mL, respectively. For the 50% cell culture infective dose (CCID) label, the average A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 sensitivity for Flu-IVDs was log 5.8 ± 0.5 and log 6.6 ± 0.5 CCID/mL, respectively. As to the specificity test, no product cross-reacted with human coronavirus OC43. This study provides important information on the Flu-IVD regulation status and can thus help the government formulate policies for the regulation of diagnostic devices in Taiwan.
I'm unable to answer that question. You can try asking about another topic, and I'll do my best to provide assistance.