Suppr超能文献

在姑息治疗居家护理中,谁是关键工作者?

Who is the key worker in palliative home care?

机构信息

Research Unit for General Practice and Department of Family Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Bartholins Alle 2, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Sep;29(3):150-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.603282. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Palliative home care involves coordination of care between the professionals involved. The NICE guideline on supportive and palliative care (UK) recommends that teams, regardless of their base, should promote continuity for patients. This may involve nomination of a coordinating "key worker". This study aimed to explore who acts as key worker and who ought to take on this role in the views of patients, relatives, and primary care professionals. Furthermore, it aimed to explore the level of agreement on this issue between study participants.

DESIGN

Interview and questionnaire study.

SETTING

Former County of Aarhus, Denmark (2008-2009).

SUBJECTS

Ninety-six terminally ill cancer patients, their relatives, general practitioners (GPs), and community nurses (CNs).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Actual key worker as valued by patients, relatives, and primary care professionals; ideal key worker as valued by patients and relatives. RESULTS. Patients, relatives, GPs, and CNs most often saw themselves as having been the key worker. When asked about the ideal key worker, most patients (29%; 95%CI: 18;42) and relatives (32%; 95%CI: 22;45) pointed to the GP. Using patients' views as reference, we found very limited agreement with relatives (47.7%; k = 0.05), with GPs (30.4%; k = 0.01) and with CNs (25.0%; k = 0.04). Agreement between patients and relatives on the identity of the ideal key worker was of a similar dimension (29.6%; k = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Poor agreement between patients, relatives, and professionals on actual and ideal key worker emphasizes the need for matching expectations and clear communication about task distribution in palliative home care.

摘要

目的

姑息治疗居家护理需要协调相关专业人员的工作。英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)关于支持性和姑息治疗的指南建议,无论团队的基础如何,都应为患者提供连续性服务。这可能涉及指定一名协调“主要工作人员”。本研究旨在探讨在患者、家属和初级保健专业人员看来,谁充当主要工作人员,谁应该担任这一角色。此外,还旨在探讨研究参与者在这个问题上的一致性程度。

设计

访谈和问卷调查研究。

地点

丹麦前阿胡斯郡(2008-2009 年)。

受试者

96 名绝症癌症患者、他们的家属、全科医生(GP)和社区护士(CN)。

主要观察指标

患者、家属和初级保健专业人员认为的实际主要工作人员;患者和家属认为的理想主要工作人员。结果:患者、家属、GP 和 CN 最常认为自己是主要工作人员。当被问及理想的主要工作人员时,大多数患者(29%;95%可信区间:18%;42%)和家属(32%;95%可信区间:22%;45%)指出是 GP。根据患者的意见作为参考,我们发现与家属(47.7%;k=0.05)、GP(30.4%;k=0.01)和 CN(25.0%;k=0.04)的一致性非常有限。患者和家属对理想主要工作人员身份的一致性也处于类似水平(29.6%;k=0.11)。

结论

患者、家属和专业人员在实际和理想主要工作人员方面的一致性较差,这强调了在姑息治疗居家护理中需要匹配期望和明确沟通任务分配的必要性。

相似文献

1
Who is the key worker in palliative home care?在姑息治疗居家护理中,谁是关键工作者?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Sep;29(3):150-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.603282. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
9
Preference for place-of-death among terminally ill cancer patients in Denmark.丹麦晚期癌症患者对死亡地点的偏好。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2011 Dec;25(4):627-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00870.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.

引用本文的文献

10
Danish general practitioners' self-reported competences in end-of-life care.丹麦全科医生自我报告的临终关怀能力。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):420-427. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1249059. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

5
End-of-life care pathways for improving outcomes in caring for the dying.改善临终关怀结局的临终护理路径。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD008006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008006.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验