• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Who is the key worker in palliative home care?在姑息治疗居家护理中,谁是关键工作者?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Sep;29(3):150-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.603282. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
2
What are essential elements of high-quality palliative care at home? An interview study among patients and relatives faced with advanced cancer.居家高质量姑息治疗的基本要素有哪些?一项针对晚期癌症患者和家属的访谈研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Nov 6;18(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0485-7.
3
Associations between successful palliative trajectories, place of death and GP involvement.成功的姑息治疗轨迹、死亡地点和全科医生参与之间的关联。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Sep;28(3):138-45. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2010.505316.
4
Interdisciplinary cooperation of GPs in palliative care at home: a nationwide survey in The Netherlands.荷兰全科医生在家中姑息治疗方面的跨学科合作:一项全国性调查
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007 Dec;25(4):226-31. doi: 10.1080/02813430701706501.
5
Cooperating with a palliative home-care team: expectations and evaluations of GPs and district nurses.与姑息性家庭护理团队合作:全科医生和社区护士的期望与评估
Palliat Med. 2005 Apr;19(3):241-50. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm1007oa.
6
Attitudes of Danish doctors and nurses to palliative and terminal care.丹麦医生和护士对姑息治疗和临终关怀的态度。
Palliat Med. 2005 Mar;19(2):119-27. doi: 10.1191/0269216305pm988oa.
7
[Optimal care at the end of life from the relatives' perspective: An interview study in two counties of Lower Saxony].[从亲属角度看临终关怀的最佳实践:下萨克森州两个县的访谈研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Aug;188:48-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
8
Who should provide care for patients receiving palliative chemotherapy? A qualitative study among Dutch general practitioners and oncologists.谁应该为接受姑息化疗的患者提供护理?一项针对荷兰全科医生和肿瘤学家的定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Dec;36(4):437-445. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1535264. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
9
Preference for place-of-death among terminally ill cancer patients in Denmark.丹麦晚期癌症患者对死亡地点的偏好。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2011 Dec;25(4):627-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00870.x. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
10
Shared care in basic level palliative home care: organizational and interpersonal challenges.基层姑息治疗居家护理中的共同照护:组织和人际方面的挑战。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Sep;13(9):1071-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0036.

引用本文的文献

1
Experiences of healthcare professionals providing palliative care in home settings - a scoping review.医疗保健专业人员在家庭环境中提供姑息治疗的经验——一项范围综述。
BMC Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 28;24(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12904-025-01728-z.
2
Put on the sidelines of palliative care: a qualitative study of important barriers to GPs' participation in palliative care and guideline implementation in Norway.置于姑息治疗的边缘:一项定性研究,探讨挪威全科医生参与姑息治疗和实施指南的重要障碍。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2024 Jun;42(2):254-265. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2024.2306241. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
3
Finding their place - general practitioners' experiences with palliative care-a Norwegian qualitative study.寻找自己的位置 - 全科医生在姑息治疗方面的经验-挪威的一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 12;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01015-1.
4
Listening to Caregivers' Voices: The Informal Family Caregiver Burden of Caring for Chronically Ill Bedridden Elderly Patients.倾听照护者的心声:长期患病卧床的老年患者的非正式家庭照护者负担。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 5;19(1):567. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010567.
5
Discordance and concordance on perception of quality care at end of life between older patients, caregivers and clinicians: a scoping review.老年患者、照护者和临床医生对临终关怀质量感知的不和谐与和谐:范围综述。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Feb;13(1):87-99. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00549-6. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
6
Palliative care in general practice; a questionnaire study on the GPs role and guideline implementation in Norway.全科医学中的姑息治疗;挪威的全科医生角色和指南实施情况的问卷调查研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Apr 7;22(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01426-8.
7
GPs' perspective on End-of-Life Care - an evaluation based on the German version of the General Practice End of Life Care Index.全科医生对临终关怀的看法 - 基于一般实践临终关怀指数德国版的评估。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Nov 16;18:Doc10. doi: 10.3205/000286. eCollection 2020.
8
Silent voices: Family caregivers' narratives of involvement in palliative care.无声的声音:家庭照顾者参与姑息治疗的叙述
Nurs Open. 2019 Aug 10;6(4):1446-1454. doi: 10.1002/nop2.344. eCollection 2019 Oct.
9
Development, modelling, and pilot testing of a complex intervention to support end-of-life care provided by Danish general practitioners.一项支持丹麦全科医生提供临终关怀的复杂干预措施的开发、建模及试点测试。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jun 20;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0774-x.
10
Danish general practitioners' self-reported competences in end-of-life care.丹麦全科医生自我报告的临终关怀能力。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Dec;34(4):420-427. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1249059. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Shared care in basic level palliative home care: organizational and interpersonal challenges.基层姑息治疗居家护理中的共同照护:组织和人际方面的挑战。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Sep;13(9):1071-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0036.
2
Associations between successful palliative trajectories, place of death and GP involvement.成功的姑息治疗轨迹、死亡地点和全科医生参与之间的关联。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2010 Sep;28(3):138-45. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2010.505316.
3
Validation of the Mexican-Spanish version of the EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL questionnaire for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients on palliative care.验证用于评估姑息治疗患者健康相关生活质量的 EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL 问卷的墨西哥西班牙语版。
Psychooncology. 2011 Aug;20(8):889-96. doi: 10.1002/pon.1801. Epub 2010 Jul 26.
4
Archetypal trajectories of social, psychological, and spiritual wellbeing and distress in family care givers of patients with lung cancer: secondary analysis of serial qualitative interviews.肺癌患者家庭照顾者的社会、心理和精神健康与困扰的典型轨迹:系列定性访谈的二次分析。
BMJ. 2010 Jun 9;340:c2581. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c2581.
5
End-of-life care pathways for improving outcomes in caring for the dying.改善临终关怀结局的临终护理路径。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jan 20(1):CD008006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008006.pub2.
6
Making sure services deliver for people with advanced heart failure: a longitudinal qualitative study of patients, family carers, and health professionals.确保为晚期心力衰竭患者提供服务:对患者、家庭照顾者和卫生专业人员进行的纵向定性研究。
Palliat Med. 2009 Dec;23(8):767-76. doi: 10.1177/0269216309346541. Epub 2009 Nov 19.
7
Symptoms and problems in a nationally representative sample of advanced cancer patients.晚期癌症患者的全国代表性样本中的症状和问题。
Palliat Med. 2009 Sep;23(6):491-501. doi: 10.1177/0269216309105400. Epub 2009 May 14.
8
Why are some patients in treatment for advanced cancer reluctant to consult their GP?为什么一些晚期癌症患者在接受治疗时不愿咨询他们的全科医生?
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(1):58-62. doi: 10.1080/02813430802677817.
9
Cancer surviving patients' rehabilitation - understanding failure through application of theoretical perspectives from Habermas.癌症幸存患者的康复——通过应用哈贝马斯的理论视角来理解失败
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Jun 6;8:122. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-122.
10
Palliative care for cancer patients in a primary health care setting: Bereaved relatives' experience, a qualitative group interview study.基层医疗环境中癌症患者的姑息治疗:丧亲亲属的经历,一项定性小组访谈研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2008 Jan 15;7:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-7-1.

在姑息治疗居家护理中,谁是关键工作者?

Who is the key worker in palliative home care?

机构信息

Research Unit for General Practice and Department of Family Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Bartholins Alle 2, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Scand J Prim Health Care. 2011 Sep;29(3):150-6. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2011.603282. Epub 2011 Aug 23.

DOI:10.3109/02813432.2011.603282
PMID:21861601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3347960/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Palliative home care involves coordination of care between the professionals involved. The NICE guideline on supportive and palliative care (UK) recommends that teams, regardless of their base, should promote continuity for patients. This may involve nomination of a coordinating "key worker". This study aimed to explore who acts as key worker and who ought to take on this role in the views of patients, relatives, and primary care professionals. Furthermore, it aimed to explore the level of agreement on this issue between study participants.

DESIGN

Interview and questionnaire study.

SETTING

Former County of Aarhus, Denmark (2008-2009).

SUBJECTS

Ninety-six terminally ill cancer patients, their relatives, general practitioners (GPs), and community nurses (CNs).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Actual key worker as valued by patients, relatives, and primary care professionals; ideal key worker as valued by patients and relatives. RESULTS. Patients, relatives, GPs, and CNs most often saw themselves as having been the key worker. When asked about the ideal key worker, most patients (29%; 95%CI: 18;42) and relatives (32%; 95%CI: 22;45) pointed to the GP. Using patients' views as reference, we found very limited agreement with relatives (47.7%; k = 0.05), with GPs (30.4%; k = 0.01) and with CNs (25.0%; k = 0.04). Agreement between patients and relatives on the identity of the ideal key worker was of a similar dimension (29.6%; k = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Poor agreement between patients, relatives, and professionals on actual and ideal key worker emphasizes the need for matching expectations and clear communication about task distribution in palliative home care.

摘要

目的

姑息治疗居家护理需要协调相关专业人员的工作。英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)关于支持性和姑息治疗的指南建议,无论团队的基础如何,都应为患者提供连续性服务。这可能涉及指定一名协调“主要工作人员”。本研究旨在探讨在患者、家属和初级保健专业人员看来,谁充当主要工作人员,谁应该担任这一角色。此外,还旨在探讨研究参与者在这个问题上的一致性程度。

设计

访谈和问卷调查研究。

地点

丹麦前阿胡斯郡(2008-2009 年)。

受试者

96 名绝症癌症患者、他们的家属、全科医生(GP)和社区护士(CN)。

主要观察指标

患者、家属和初级保健专业人员认为的实际主要工作人员;患者和家属认为的理想主要工作人员。结果:患者、家属、GP 和 CN 最常认为自己是主要工作人员。当被问及理想的主要工作人员时,大多数患者(29%;95%可信区间:18%;42%)和家属(32%;95%可信区间:22%;45%)指出是 GP。根据患者的意见作为参考,我们发现与家属(47.7%;k=0.05)、GP(30.4%;k=0.01)和 CN(25.0%;k=0.04)的一致性非常有限。患者和家属对理想主要工作人员身份的一致性也处于类似水平(29.6%;k=0.11)。

结论

患者、家属和专业人员在实际和理想主要工作人员方面的一致性较差,这强调了在姑息治疗居家护理中需要匹配期望和明确沟通任务分配的必要性。