Suppr超能文献

老年患者、照护者和临床医生对临终关怀质量感知的不和谐与和谐:范围综述。

Discordance and concordance on perception of quality care at end of life between older patients, caregivers and clinicians: a scoping review.

机构信息

School of Business, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia.

Gold Coast University Hospital Consumer Advisory Group, Southport, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Feb;13(1):87-99. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00549-6. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This scoping review aimed to investigate the presence of discordance or concordance in the perceptions of end-of-life (EOL) care quality between consumers (i.e. patients aged over 60 in their last years of life and/or their informal caregivers) and clinicians, to inform further improvements in end-of-life care service delivery.

METHODS

A scoping review of qualitative and quantitative studies was systematically undertaken by searching for English language publications in MEDLINE database and manual reference search of eligible articles. Thematic analysis was employed to identify and extract common concordance and discordance themes leading to the development of analytical constructs. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported on consumers' (i.e. older patients aged 60 + years in their final years of life and/or their informal caregivers) and clinicians' (doctors, nurses, social workers, etc.) perspectives on quality of medical, surgical or palliative/supportive care administered to older adults in the last year of life across all healthcare settings.

RESULTS

Of the 2736 articles screened, 21 articles were included. Four themes identified concordance between consumers' and clinicians' perceptions of care quality: holistic patient care; coordinated care that facilitated EOL; the role of family at EOL; and impact of prognostic uncertainty on care planning. Three themes emerged for discordance of perceptions: understanding the patient needs at EOL; capacity of healthcare system/providers to accommodate family needs; and knowledge and communication of active or palliative care at EOL.

CONCLUSIONS

While progress has been made on promoting patient autonomy and respecting the family role in representing patient's best interest, gaps remain in terms of care coordination, communication of prognosis, public understanding of the meaning of goals of care including de-escalation of management and enactment of advance care directives by clinicians for people with diminished decision capacity. Public understanding of the meaning of "comfort" care and the need to prevent over-treatment are essential for their satisfaction with care and their ability to embrace the concept of a good death.

摘要

背景

本范围综述旨在调查消费者(即生命末期的 60 岁以上患者和/或其非正式照护者)和临床医生对临终关怀质量的看法是否存在差异或一致,以进一步改善临终关怀服务的提供。

方法

通过在 MEDLINE 数据库中搜索英文出版物,并对合格文章进行手动参考文献搜索,系统地进行了范围综述定性和定量研究。采用主题分析来确定和提取导致分析结构发展的常见一致性和差异性主题。如果文章报告了消费者(即生命末期的 60 岁以上患者和/或其非正式照护者)和临床医生(医生、护士、社会工作者等)对所有医疗保健环境中生命末期老年患者的医疗、手术或姑息/支持性护理质量的看法,则符合纳入标准。

结果

在筛选出的 2736 篇文章中,有 21 篇文章被纳入。确定了四个主题,这些主题表明了消费者和临床医生对护理质量的看法是一致的:全面的患者护理;促进临终关怀的协调护理;临终时家庭的作用;以及预后不确定性对护理计划的影响。出现了三个主题,表明看法存在差异:了解临终时患者的需求;医疗保健系统/提供者满足家庭需求的能力;以及对积极或姑息治疗的知识和沟通在临终时的作用。

结论

虽然在促进患者自主性和尊重家庭在代表患者最佳利益方面取得了进展,但在护理协调、预后沟通、公众对包括管理降级和临床医生为决策能力下降的人制定预先护理指令在内的治疗目标意义的理解、以及公众对“舒适”护理的意义和避免过度治疗的需求的理解方面仍存在差距。公众对“舒适”护理的意义和避免过度治疗的需求的理解是他们对护理的满意度和接受良好死亡概念的能力的关键。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4f98/8359918/0b5f747c7567/41999_2021_549_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验