Department of Surgery-Traumatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2300 RC Leiden, the Netherlands.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Aug 24;12:196. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-196.
The traditional view that the vast majority of midshaft clavicular fractures heal with good functional outcomes following non-operative treatment may be no longer valid for all midshaft clavicular fractures. Recent studies have presented a relatively high incidence of non-union and identified speciic limitations of the shoulder function in subgroups of patients with these injuries.
A prospective, multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted in 21 hospitals in the Netherlands, comparing fracture consolidation and shoulder function after either non-operative treatment with a sling or a plate fixation.
METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 350 patients will be included, between 18 and 60 years of age, with a dislocated midshaft clavicular fracture. The primary outcome is the incidence of non-union, which will be determined with standardised X-rays (Antero-Posterior and 30 degrees caudocephalad view). Secondary outcome will be the functional outcome, measured using the Constant Score. Strength of the shoulder muscles will be measured with a handheld dynamometer (MicroFET2). Furthermore, the health-related Quality of Life score (ShortForm-36) and the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Measure will be monitored as subjective parameters. Data on complications, bone union, cosmetic aspects and use of painkillers will be collected with follow-up questionnaires. The follow-up time will be two years. All patients will be monitored at regular intervals over the subsequent twelve months (two and six weeks, three months and one year). After two years an interview by telephone and a written survey will be performed to evaluate the two-year functional and mechanical outcomes. All data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis, using univariate and multivariate analyses.
This trial will provide level-1 evidence for the comparison of consolidation and functional outcome between two standardised treatment options for dislocated midshaft clavicular fractures. The gathered data may support the development of a clinical guideline for treatment of clavicular fractures.
Netherlands National Trial Register NTR2399.
传统观点认为,绝大多数锁骨中段骨折经非手术治疗后均可获得良好的功能结果,但对于所有锁骨中段骨折而言,这种观点可能不再适用。最近的研究表明,部分此类骨折患者发生不愈合的比例相对较高,并发现了这些患者在肩部功能方面的具体局限性。
本研究将在荷兰 21 家医院进行一项前瞻性、多中心随机对照试验(RCT),比较吊带或钢板固定治疗锁骨中段骨折后骨折愈合和肩关节功能。
方法/设计:共纳入 350 例年龄在 18 至 60 岁之间的锁骨中段移位骨折患者。主要结局为不愈合发生率,将通过标准 X 射线(前后位和 30 度头侧斜位)确定。次要结局为使用 Constant 评分测量的功能结果。将使用手持测力计(MicroFET2)测量肩部肌肉力量。此外,将监测健康相关生活质量评分(ShortForm-36)和残疾程度(手臂、肩部和手的残疾)(DASH)测量作为主观参数。将通过随访问卷收集并发症、骨愈合、美容方面和止痛药使用的数据。随访时间为两年。所有患者将在随后的 12 个月内定期监测(2 周、6 周、3 个月和 1 年)。两年后,将通过电话访谈和书面调查评估两年的功能和机械结果。所有数据均将基于意向治疗进行分析,使用单变量和多变量分析。
本试验将为两种标准化治疗方案治疗移位锁骨中段骨折的愈合和功能结果比较提供 1 级证据。所收集的数据可能支持制定锁骨骨折治疗临床指南。
荷兰国家试验注册处 NTR2399。