Traag V A, Van Dooren P, Nesterov Y
ICTEAM, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la Neuve, Belgium.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2011 Jul;84(1 Pt 2):016114. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.84.016114. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
Detecting communities in large networks has drawn much attention over the years. While modularity remains one of the more popular methods of community detection, the so-called resolution limit remains a significant drawback. To overcome this issue, it was recently suggested that instead of comparing the network to a random null model, as is done in modularity, it should be compared to a constant factor. However, it is unclear what is meant exactly by "resolution-limit-free," that is, not suffering from the resolution limit. Furthermore, the question remains what other methods could be classified as resolution-limit-free. In this paper we suggest a rigorous definition and derive some basic properties of resolution-limit-free methods. More importantly, we are able to prove exactly which class of community detection methods are resolution-limit-free. Furthermore, we analyze which methods are not resolution-limit-free, suggesting there is only a limited scope for resolution-limit-free community detection methods. Finally, we provide such a natural formulation, and show it performs superbly.
多年来,在大型网络中检测社区一直备受关注。虽然模块度仍然是社区检测中较受欢迎的方法之一,但所谓的分辨率极限仍然是一个重大缺陷。为了克服这个问题,最近有人提出,与模块度中那样将网络与随机空模型进行比较不同,应该将其与一个常数因子进行比较。然而,“无分辨率极限”的确切含义并不明确,也就是说,不受分辨率极限的影响。此外,问题仍然存在,即哪些其他方法可以被归类为无分辨率极限。在本文中,我们提出了一个严格的定义,并推导了无分辨率极限方法的一些基本性质。更重要的是,我们能够确切地证明哪一类社区检测方法是无分辨率极限的。此外,我们分析了哪些方法不是无分辨率极限的,这表明无分辨率极限的社区检测方法的范围有限。最后,我们提供了这样一种自然的表述,并表明它表现出色。