• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

夫妻间的性别平等与自评健康——一项评估性别平等测量指标及其对健康影响的调查研究。

Gender equality in couples and self-rated health - A survey study evaluating measurements of gender equality and its impact on health.

机构信息

Dept of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health, Centre for Global Health Research, Umeå University SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Int J Equity Health. 2011 Aug 26;10:37. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-10-37.

DOI:10.1186/1475-9276-10-37
PMID:21871087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3167759/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Men and women have different patterns of health. These differences between the sexes present a challenge to the field of public health. The question why women experience more health problems than men despite their longevity has been discussed extensively, with both social and biological theories being offered as plausible explanations. In this article, we focus on how gender equality in a partnership might be associated with the respondents' perceptions of health.

METHODS

This study was a cross-sectional survey with 1400 respondents. We measured gender equality using two different measures: 1) a self-reported gender equality index, and 2) a self-perceived gender equality question. The aim of comparison of the self-reported gender equality index with the self-perceived gender equality question was to reveal possible disagreements between the normative discourse on gender equality and daily practice in couple relationships. We then evaluated the association with health, measured as self-rated health (SRH). With SRH dichotomized into 'good' and 'poor', logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with the outcome. For the comparison between the self-reported gender equality index and self-perceived gender equality, kappa statistics were used.

RESULTS

Associations between gender equality and health found in this study vary with the type of gender equality measurement. Overall, we found little agreement between the self-reported gender equality index and self-perceived gender equality. Further, the patterns of agreement between self-perceived and self-reported gender equality were quite different for men and women: men perceived greater gender equality than they reported in the index, while women perceived less gender equality than they reported. The associations to health were depending on gender equality measurement used.

CONCLUSIONS

Men and women perceive and report gender equality differently. This means that it is necessary not only to be conscious of the methods and measurements used to quantify men's and women's opinions of gender equality, but also to be aware of the implications for health outcomes.

摘要

背景

男性和女性的健康模式不同。这些性别差异给公共卫生领域带来了挑战。尽管女性寿命更长,但她们比男性经历更多健康问题的原因,已经引起了广泛的讨论,社会和生物理论都提出了合理的解释。在本文中,我们专注于伴侣关系中的性别平等如何与受访者对健康的看法相关联。

方法

这是一项横断面调查,共有 1400 名受访者。我们使用两种不同的方法衡量性别平等:1)自我报告的性别平等指数,2)自我感知的性别平等问题。比较自我报告的性别平等指数和自我感知的性别平等问题的目的是揭示性别平等的规范话语与夫妻关系中的日常实践之间可能存在的分歧。然后,我们评估了与健康的关联,健康的衡量标准是自我报告的健康状况(SRH)。将 SRH 分为“良好”和“差”,然后使用逻辑回归评估与结果相关的因素。对于自我报告的性别平等指数和自我感知的性别平等之间的比较,使用 Kappa 统计量。

结果

本研究中发现的性别平等与健康之间的关联因性别平等测量类型而异。总体而言,我们发现自我报告的性别平等指数和自我感知的性别平等之间几乎没有一致性。此外,自我感知和自我报告的性别平等之间的一致性模式在男性和女性之间有很大的不同:男性认为性别平等程度大于他们在指数中报告的程度,而女性则认为性别平等程度小于他们报告的程度。与健康相关的关联取决于所使用的性别平等测量方法。

结论

男性和女性对性别平等的看法和报告方式不同。这意味着,不仅需要意识到用于量化男性和女性对性别平等看法的方法和测量,还需要意识到这些方法和测量对健康结果的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98d1/3167759/9d66ac21cf33/1475-9276-10-37-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98d1/3167759/9d66ac21cf33/1475-9276-10-37-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/98d1/3167759/9d66ac21cf33/1475-9276-10-37-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Gender equality in couples and self-rated health - A survey study evaluating measurements of gender equality and its impact on health.夫妻间的性别平等与自评健康——一项评估性别平等测量指标及其对健康影响的调查研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2011 Aug 26;10:37. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-10-37.
2
Gender Norms and Gender Equality in Full-Time Employment and Health: A 97-Country Analysis of the World Values Survey.全职就业与健康方面的性别规范和性别平等:对世界价值观调查中97个国家的分析。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 31;13:689815. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.689815. eCollection 2022.
3
Can the impact of gender equality on health be measured? A cross-sectional study comparing measures based on register data with individual survey-based data.性别平等对健康的影响能否衡量?一项基于登记数据和个体调查数据的横断面研究比较。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 17;12:795. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-795.
4
Effectiveness of a culturally appropriate intervention to prevent intimate partner violence and HIV transmission among men, women, and couples in rural Ethiopia: Findings from a cluster-randomized controlled trial.文化适宜型干预在埃塞俄比亚农村地区预防男性、女性和夫妻间亲密伴侣暴力和艾滋病毒传播的效果:一项基于群组随机对照试验的研究结果。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003274. eCollection 2020 Aug.
5
Whose Issue Is It Anyway? The Effects of Leader Gender and Equality Message Framing on Men's and Women's Mobilization Toward Workplace Gender Equality.这到底是谁的问题?领导者性别和平等信息框架对男性和女性推动职场性别平等的影响。
Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 11;9:2497. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02497. eCollection 2018.
6
The power of women's and men's Social Networks to catalyse normative and behavioural change: evaluation of an intervention addressing Unmet need for Family Planning in Benin.女性和男性社会网络促进规范和行为改变的力量:评估一项针对贝宁计划生育未满足需求的干预措施。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 7;22(1):672. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12681-4.
7
Advancing gender equality through the Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science: an exploratory study of women's and men's perceptions.通过《雅典娜天鹅科学领域女性宪章》推进性别平等:关于女性和男性认知的探索性研究
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Feb 21;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0177-9.
8
Factors associated with gender equality among church-going young men in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a cross-sectional study.与金沙萨教会男青年性别平等相关的因素:一项横断面研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Dec 11;16(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0707-7.
9
Factors influencing adolescents' healthy pregnancy preparation behavior: a cross-sectional gender comparison applying the health belief model.影响青少年健康妊娠准备行为的因素:应用健康信念模型的跨性别比较
Reprod Health. 2022 Apr 5;19(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12978-022-01392-z.
10
The influence of gender equality policies on gender inequalities in health in Europe.欧洲性别平等政策对健康领域性别不平等的影响。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;117:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.018. Epub 2014 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
A cash transfer plus gender transformative economic empowerment intervention seeking to improve the wellbeing of caregivers of children and adolescents living with HIV in South Africa: a feasibility study protocol for a pilot cluster randomized trial.一项旨在改善南非感染艾滋病毒儿童和青少年照料者福祉的现金转移支付与性别变革性经济赋权干预措施:一项试点整群随机试验的可行性研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Apr 23;11(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01643-3.
2
Gender Self-Perception and Psychological Distress in Healthcare Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间医护专业学生的性别自我认知与心理困扰
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 17;18(20):10918. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010918.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Is gender inequality in the domestic sphere associated with psychological distress among women and men? Results from the Northern Swedish Cohort.家庭领域中的性别不平等是否与女性和男性的心理困扰有关?来自瑞典北部队列的研究结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Mar;66(3):271-6. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.109231. Epub 2010 Oct 12.
2
How do masculinity, paternity leave, and mortality associate? -A study of fathers in the Swedish parental & child cohort of 1988/89.男性气质、陪产假和死亡率之间有何关联?——1988/89 年瑞典父母和子女队列中父亲的一项研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Aug;71(3):576-583. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 May 25.
3
Sex and gender considerations in implementation interventions to promote shared decision making: A secondary analysis of a Cochrane systematic review.
在实施干预措施以促进共同决策时考虑性别因素:对 Cochrane 系统评价的二次分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 8;15(10):e0240371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240371. eCollection 2020.
4
Time trends of comparative self-rated health in adults aged 25-34 in the Northern Sweden MONICA study, 1990-2014.1990 - 2014年瑞典北部MONICA研究中25 - 34岁成年人比较自评健康状况的时间趋势。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 20;12(11):e0187896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187896. eCollection 2017.
5
The gender gap in relation to happiness and preferences in married couples after childbirth: evidence from a field experiment in rural Ghana.产后已婚夫妇在幸福度和偏好方面的性别差异:来自加纳农村一项实地实验的证据。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2017 Mar 15;36(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s41043-017-0084-2.
6
Why sex and gender matter in implementation research.为何性别在实施研究中至关重要。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Oct 27;16(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0247-7.
7
Socioeconomic inequalities show remarkably poor association with health and disease in Southern Croatia.在克罗地亚南部,社会经济不平等与健康和疾病之间的关联非常微弱。
Int J Public Health. 2015 May;60(4):417-26. doi: 10.1007/s00038-015-0667-x. Epub 2015 Mar 3.
8
Dimensions of gender relations and reproductive health inequity perceived by female undergraduate students in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam: a qualitative exploration.越南湄公河三角洲女大学生感知的性别关系维度与生殖健康不平等:一项定性探索。
Int J Equity Health. 2012 Oct 24;11:63. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-63.
9
Can the impact of gender equality on health be measured? A cross-sectional study comparing measures based on register data with individual survey-based data.性别平等对健康的影响能否衡量?一项基于登记数据和个体调查数据的横断面研究比较。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Sep 17;12:795. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-795.
Further thoughts on gender and lifetime health.
关于性别与终生健康的进一步思考。
Gerontology. 2010;56(3):345-7. doi: 10.1159/000274381. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
4
A theoretical model for analysing gender bias in medicine.分析医学中性别偏见的理论模型。
Int J Equity Health. 2009 Aug 3;8:28. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-8-28.
5
Closing the gap in a generation: health equity through action on the social determinants of health.消除一代人之间的差距:通过针对健康的社会决定因素采取行动实现健康公平。
Lancet. 2008 Nov 8;372(9650):1661-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6.
6
Does increased gender equality lead to a convergence of health outcomes for men and women? A study of Swedish municipalities.性别平等的提高是否会导致男性和女性健康结果趋同?一项对瑞典市政当局的研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2007 May;64(9):1892-903. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.01.016. Epub 2007 Mar 6.
7
Constructing socio-economic status indices: how to use principal components analysis.构建社会经济地位指数:如何使用主成分分析
Health Policy Plan. 2006 Nov;21(6):459-68. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czl029. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
8
Embodiment: a conceptual glossary for epidemiology.体现:流行病学概念词汇表。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 May;59(5):350-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.024562.
9
The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements.可靠性研究中的kappa统计量:用途、解释及样本量要求。
Phys Ther. 2005 Mar;85(3):257-68.
10
Considering rational self-interest as a disposition: organizational implications of other orientation.将理性自我利益视为一种倾向:他人导向的组织影响
J Appl Psychol. 2004 Dec;89(6):946-59. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.946.