James Cook University, Townsville, North Queensland, Australia.
Qual Health Res. 2012 Jan;22(1):134-43. doi: 10.1177/1049732311420580. Epub 2011 Aug 26.
Empathy is a very familiar term in the helping and caring literature. What appears to link empathy in the helping literature to the aims and goals of qualitative research and, in particular, to the argument underpinning insider/outsider debates, is a discernible common quest. That quest is to be able to hear, feel, understand, and value the stories of others and to convey that felt empathy and understanding back to the client/storyteller/participant. When relevant, the quest also includes conveying that felt understanding to a broader audience. In this article, I highlight commonalities between empathy in professional practice and empathy in qualitative research processes, including the shared experiences and understanding informing research relationships that are discussed as "insider/outsider" status. I review, discuss, and critique relevant literature, and I conclude by suggesting that cultivating empathy in qualitative research training could contribute to facilitating more enriched, insightful research encounters.
同理心在助人文学中是一个非常熟悉的术语。在助人文献中,同理心似乎与定性研究的目的和目标,特别是与支持局内人/局外人争论的论点联系在一起,这是一个明显的共同追求。这种追求是能够倾听、感受、理解和重视他人的故事,并将这种同理心和理解传达给客户/讲故事的人/参与者。在相关的情况下,这种追求还包括将这种理解传达给更广泛的受众。在本文中,我强调了专业实践中的同理心和定性研究过程中的同理心之间的共同点,包括共同的经验和理解,这些经验和理解为被讨论为“局内人/局外人”地位的研究关系提供了信息。我回顾、讨论和批判了相关文献,并在最后提出,在定性研究培训中培养同理心可以有助于促进更丰富、更有洞察力的研究。