Suppr超能文献

对婴幼儿听力结果测量方法的批判性综述。

A critical review of audiological outcome measures for infants and children.

作者信息

Bagatto Marlene P, Moodie Sheila T, Seewald Richard C, Bartlett Doreen J, Scollie Susan D

机构信息

National Centre for Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Trends Amplif. 2011 Mar-Jun;15(1):23-33. doi: 10.1177/1084713811412056. Epub 2011 Aug 25.

Abstract

Outcome evaluation is an important stage in the pediatric hearing aid fitting process, however a systematic way of evaluating outcome in the pediatric audiology population is lacking. This is in part due to the need for an evidence-based outcome evaluation guideline for infants and children with hearing loss who wear hearing aids. As part of the development of a guideline, a critical review of the existing pediatric audiology outcome evaluation tools was conducted. Subjective outcome evaluation tools that measure auditory-related behaviors in children from birth to 6 years of age were critically appraised using a published grading system (Andresen, 2000). Of the tools that exist, 12 were appraised because they met initial criteria outlined by the Network of Pediatric Audiologists of Canada as being appropriate for children birth to 6 years of age who wear hearing aids. Tools that were considered for the guideline scored high in both statistical and feasibility criteria. The subjective outcome evaluation tools that were ultimately chosen to be included in the guideline were the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire (Tsiakpini et al., 2004) and the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) Rating Scale (Ching & Hill, 2005b) due to the high grades they received in the critical review and their target age ranges. Following this critical review of pediatric outcome evaluation tools, the next step was for the Network Clinicians to evaluate the guideline (Moodie et al., 2011b).

摘要

结果评估是儿童助听器验配过程中的一个重要阶段,然而,目前缺乏一种系统的方法来评估儿科听力学人群的结果。部分原因在于,需要为佩戴助听器的听力损失婴幼儿制定基于证据的结果评估指南。作为指南制定的一部分,对现有的儿科听力学结果评估工具进行了批判性综述。使用已发表的分级系统(Andresen,2000年)对测量出生至6岁儿童听觉相关行为的主观结果评估工具进行了严格评估。在现有的工具中,有12种工具被评估,因为它们符合加拿大儿科听力学家网络概述的初步标准,适用于佩戴助听器的出生至6岁儿童。被考虑纳入指南的工具在统计和可行性标准方面得分都很高。最终被选入指南的主观结果评估工具是《小耳朵听觉问卷》(Tsiakpini等人,2004年)和《儿童听觉/口语表现家长评估》(PEACH)评分量表(Ching & Hill,2005b),这是因为它们在批判性综述中获得了高分以及其目标年龄范围。在对儿科结果评估工具进行这一批判性综述之后,下一步是由网络临床医生对该指南进行评估(Moodie等人,2011b)。

相似文献

1
6
An Australian survey of audiologists' preferences for patient-centredness.澳大利亚听力学家对以患者为中心的偏好调查。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Feb;53 Suppl 1:S76-82. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.832418. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
9
Patient-centred care: a review for rehabilitative audiologists.以患者为中心的护理:康复听力学家的综述。
Int J Audiol. 2014 Feb;53 Suppl 1:S60-7. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.847286. Epub 2014 Jan 21.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Goals and expectations of the hearing aid fitting.助听器验配的目标和期望。
Trends Amplif. 1999 Jun;4(2):61-71. doi: 10.1177/108471389900400206.
7
The national protocol for paediatric amplification in Australia.澳大利亚儿科放大的国家方案。
Int J Audiol. 2010 Jan;49 Suppl 1:S64-9. doi: 10.3109/14992020903329422.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验