Am Psychol. 2011 Oct;66(7):614-23. doi: 10.1037/a0025215.
Most current ethical decision-making models provide a logical and reasoned process for making ethical judgments, but these models are empirically unproven and rely upon assumptions of rational, conscious, and quasilegal reasoning. Such models predominate despite the fact that many nonrational factors influence ethical thought and behavior, including context, perceptions, relationships, emotions, and heuristics. For example, a large body of behavioral research has demonstrated the importance of automatic intuitive and affective processes in decision making and judgment. These processes profoundly affect human behavior and lead to systematic biases and departures from normative theories of rationality. Their influence represents an important but largely unrecognized component of ethical decision making. We selectively review this work; provide various illustrations; and make recommendations for scientists, trainers, and practitioners to aid them in integrating the understanding of nonrational processes with ethical decision making.
大多数当前的伦理决策模型为做出伦理判断提供了一个合乎逻辑和理性的过程,但这些模型在经验上是未经证实的,并且依赖于理性、有意识和准法律推理的假设。尽管许多非理性因素会影响伦理思想和行为,包括背景、感知、关系、情感和启发式,这些模型仍然占据主导地位。例如,大量行为研究已经证明了自动直觉和情感过程在决策和判断中的重要性。这些过程深刻地影响着人类的行为,并导致系统性的偏差和偏离理性的规范性理论。它们的影响代表了伦理决策的一个重要但在很大程度上未被认识的组成部分。我们有选择地回顾了这项工作;提供了各种示例;并为科学家、培训师和从业者提出了建议,以帮助他们将对非理性过程的理解与伦理决策结合起来。