Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2011 Nov 1;3(11):a005215. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a005215.
A variety of secretory cargoes move through the Golgi, but the pathways and mechanisms of this traffic are still being debated. Here, we evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of five current models for Golgi traffic: (1) anterograde vesicular transport between stable compartments, (2) cisternal progression/maturation, (3) cisternal progression/maturation with heterotypic tubular transport, (4) rapid partitioning in a mixed Golgi, and (5) stable compartments as cisternal progenitors. Each model is assessed for its ability to explain a set of key observations encompassing multiple cell types. No single model can easily explain all of the observations from diverse organisms. However, we propose that cisternal progression/maturation is the best candidate for a conserved core mechanism of Golgi traffic, and that some cells elaborate this core mechanism by means of heterotypic tubular transport between cisternae.
各种分泌货物通过高尔基体运输,但这种运输的途径和机制仍存在争议。在这里,我们评估了高尔基体运输的五个当前模型的优缺点:(1)稳定隔室之间的顺行囊泡运输,(2)小泡从顺面高尔基网络出芽,(3)顺面高尔基网络出芽和异质管状运输,(4)混合高尔基体内的快速分区,以及(5)作为小泡前体的稳定隔室。每个模型都根据其解释一系列涵盖多种细胞类型的关键观察结果的能力进行评估。没有一个模型可以轻松地解释来自不同生物体的所有观察结果。然而,我们提出,小泡从顺面高尔基网络出芽是高尔基体运输的保守核心机制的最佳候选者,并且一些细胞通过小泡间的异质管状运输来详细阐述这个核心机制。