• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定量表观扩散系数测量和标准化表观扩散系数比在诊断临床上有意义的外周带前列腺癌中的应用。

Utility of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and normalized apparent diffusion coefficient ratios in the diagnosis of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer.

机构信息

1 Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine Medical Center , Orange, CA , USA.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1088):20180091. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180091. Epub 2018 Jun 21.

DOI:10.1259/bjr.20180091
PMID:29869921
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6209473/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to evaluate the utility of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and normalized ADC ratios in multiparametric MRI for the diagnosis of clinically significant peripheral zone (PZ) prostate cancer particularly among equivocally suspicious prostate lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 95 patients with PZ lesions by PI-RADSv2 criteria, and who underwent subsequent MRI-US fusion biopsy, was approved by an institutional review board. Two radiologists independently measured ADC values in regions of interest (ROIs) of PZ lesions and calculated normalized ADC ratio based on ROIs in the bladder lumen. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using ROC. Inter observer variability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Mean ADC and normalized ADC ratios for clinically significant and non-clinically significant lesions were 0.763 × 10-3 mm s, 29.8%; and 1.135 × 10-3 mm s, 47.2% (p < 0.001), respectively. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.880 [95% CI (0.816-0.944) and 0.885 (95% CI (0.814-0.955)] for ADC and ADC ratio, respectively. Optimal AUC threshold for ADC was 0.843 × 10-3 mm s (Sn 70.5%, Sp 88.2%) and for normalized ADC was 33.1% (Sn 75.0%, Sp 95.7%). intraclass correlation coefficient was high at 0.889.

CONCLUSION

Quantitative ADC measurement in PZ prostate lesions demonstrates excellent diagnostic performance in differentiating clinically significant from non-clinically significant prostate cancer with high inter observer correlation. Advances In knowledge: Quantitative ADC is presented as an additional method to evaluate lesions in mpMRI of the prostate. This technique may be incorporated in new and existing methods to improve detection and discrimination of clinically significant prostate cancer.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估定量表观扩散系数(ADC)测量值和多参数 MRI 中标准化 ADC 比值在诊断临床显著外周区(PZ)前列腺癌中的效用,特别是在疑似前列腺病变中。

方法

经机构审查委员会批准,回顾性分析了 95 例符合 PI-RADSv2 标准的 PZ 病变患者的资料,这些患者随后接受了 MRI-US 融合活检。两位放射科医生分别在 PZ 病变的感兴趣区域(ROI)中测量 ADC 值,并根据膀胱内腔的 ROI 计算标准化 ADC 比值。使用 ROC 评估诊断性能。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者间变异性。

结果

临床显著和非临床显著病变的平均 ADC 和标准化 ADC 比值分别为 0.763×10-3mm/s、29.8%和 1.135×10-3mm/s、47.2%(p<0.001)。ADC 和 ADC 比值的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.880[95%CI(0.816-0.944)和 0.885(95%CI(0.814-0.955)]。ADC 的最佳 AUC 阈值为 0.843×10-3mm/s(Sn70.5%,Sp88.2%),标准化 ADC 的最佳 AUC 阈值为 33.1%(Sn75.0%,Sp95.7%)。组内相关系数很高,为 0.889。

结论

PZ 前列腺病变的定量 ADC 测量在区分临床显著和非临床显著前列腺癌方面具有出色的诊断性能,且观察者间相关性高。

新知识

定量 ADC 被提出作为评估前列腺多参数 MRI 中病变的另一种方法。该技术可应用于新的和现有的方法中,以提高对临床显著前列腺癌的检测和鉴别能力。

相似文献

1
Utility of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurements and normalized apparent diffusion coefficient ratios in the diagnosis of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer.定量表观扩散系数测量和标准化表观扩散系数比在诊断临床上有意义的外周带前列腺癌中的应用。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jul;91(1088):20180091. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180091. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
2
Prospective Inclusion of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in Multiparametric Prostate MRI Structured Reports: Discrimination of Clinically Insignificant and Significant Cancers.前瞻性纳入表观扩散系数于多参数前列腺 MRI 结构化报告中:鉴别临床无意义和有意义的肿瘤。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Jan;212(1):109-116. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19937. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
3
Can Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values Assist PI-RADS Version 2 DWI Scoring? A Correlation Study Using the PI-RADSv2 and International Society of Urological Pathology Systems.表观扩散系数值能否辅助 PI-RADS 版本 2 的 DWI 评分?PI-RADSv2 与国际泌尿病理学会系统的相关性研究。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Jul;211(1):W33-W41. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18702. Epub 2018 May 7.
4
Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.扩散峰度成像与标准扩散成像在周围区前列腺癌检测及分级中的评估
Invest Radiol. 2015 Aug;50(8):483-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000155.
5
Quantitative evaluation of the relative apparent diffusion coefficient values on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict higher Gleason score prostate cancer.多参数磁共振成像上相对表观扩散系数值的定量评估以预测更高Gleason评分的前列腺癌。
Scand J Urol. 2018 Jun;52(3):180-185. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1481143. Epub 2018 Jun 25.
6
Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate: Repeatability of Volume and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Quantification.前列腺的多参数磁共振成像:体积和表观扩散系数定量的可重复性
Invest Radiol. 2017 Sep;52(9):538-546. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000382.
7
Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Derived From Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Has the Potential to Avoid Unnecessary MRI-Guided Biopsies of mpMRI-Detected PI-RADS 4 and 5 Lesions.从扩散加权成像中得出的定量表观扩散系数有可能避免对 MRI 引导活检中 PI-RADS 4 和 5 级病变进行不必要的活检。
Invest Radiol. 2018 Dec;53(12):736-741. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000498.
8
T1 Mapping of the Prostate Using Single-Shot T1FLASH: A Clinical Feasibility Study to Optimize Prostate Cancer Assessment.基于单次激发 T1FLASH 序列的前列腺 T1 mapping:一项优化前列腺癌评估的临床可行性研究。
Invest Radiol. 2023 Jun 1;58(6):380-387. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000945. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
9
Does normalisation improve the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values for prostate cancer assessment? A blinded independent-observer evaluation.标准化是否能提高表观扩散系数值在前列腺癌评估中的诊断性能?一项盲法独立观察者评估。
Clin Radiol. 2015 Sep;70(9):1032-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
10
Comparison of quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient parameters with prostate imaging reporting and data system V2 assessment for detection of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate cancer.比较定量表观扩散系数参数与前列腺影像报告和数据系统 V2 评估在检测临床显著外周带前列腺癌中的应用。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 May;43(5):1237-1244. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1297-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Editorial for "Significance of Normalized Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System for Diagnosing Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer".《关于标准化表观扩散系数在膀胱影像报告和数据系统中诊断肌肉浸润性膀胱癌的意义》的社论
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Oct;60(4):1648-1649. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29233. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
2
Biparametric prostate MRI: impact of a deep learning-based software and of quantitative ADC values on the inter-reader agreement of experienced and inexperienced readers.双参数前列腺 MRI:基于深度学习的软件和 ADC 值定量对有经验和无经验读者间一致性的影响。
Radiol Med. 2022 Nov;127(11):1245-1253. doi: 10.1007/s11547-022-01555-9. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
3
DWI-related texture analysis for prostate cancer: differences in correlation with histological aggressiveness and data repeatability between peripheral and transition zones.DWI 相关纹理分析在前列腺癌中的应用:与外周带和移行带组织学侵袭性的相关性及数据可重复性的差异。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2022 Jan 12;6(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s41747-021-00252-y.
4
Calculation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in Prostate Cancer Using Deep Learning Algorithms: A Pilot Study.使用深度学习算法计算前列腺癌中的表观扩散系数:一项初步研究。
Front Oncol. 2021 Sep 9;11:697721. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.697721. eCollection 2021.
5
Prostate minimally invasive procedures: complications and normal vs. abnormal findings on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).前列腺微创治疗:多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)的并发症和正常与异常表现。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Sep;46(9):4388-4400. doi: 10.1007/s00261-021-03097-6. Epub 2021 May 11.
6
Accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多参数磁共振成像诊断前列腺癌的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Dec 23;19(1):1244. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-6434-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer Statistics, 2017.《2017 年癌症统计》
CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
2
PI-RADS version 2: quantitative analysis aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第2版:定量分析有助于对前列腺癌的扩散加权成像进行可靠解读。
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):2776-2783. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4678-7. Epub 2016 Dec 12.
3
Preoperative Evaluation of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness: Using ADC and ADC Ratio in Determining Gleason Score.前列腺癌侵袭性的术前评估:利用表观扩散系数(ADC)及ADC比值确定 Gleason评分
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Jul;207(1):114-20. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15894. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
4
Differentiating Transition Zone Cancers From Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia by Quantitative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.通过定量多参数磁共振成像鉴别移行区癌与良性前列腺增生
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2016 Mar-Apr;40(2):218-24. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000353.
5
Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer.多参数前列腺磁共振成像在前列腺癌评估中的应用
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jul;66(4):326-36. doi: 10.3322/caac.21333. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
6
Ratio of Tumor to Normal Prostate Tissue Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Method for Quantifying DWI of the Prostate.肿瘤与正常前列腺组织表观弥散系数比值作为一种量化前列腺弥散加权成像的方法。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Dec;205(6):W585-93. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14338.
7
PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2.PI-RADS前列腺影像报告和数据系统:2015版,第2版
Eur Urol. 2016 Jan;69(1):16-40. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.052. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
8
The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy.在MRI/经直肠超声融合活检中,显著前列腺癌的检测与前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)相关。
World J Urol. 2016 Apr;34(4):525-32. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1671-8. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
9
Does normalisation improve the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values for prostate cancer assessment? A blinded independent-observer evaluation.标准化是否能提高表观扩散系数值在前列腺癌评估中的诊断性能?一项盲法独立观察者评估。
Clin Radiol. 2015 Sep;70(9):1032-7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.05.011. Epub 2015 Jun 28.
10
Apparent diffusion coefficient value and ratio as noninvasive potential biomarkers to predict prostate cancer grading: comparison with prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen.表观扩散系数值和比值作为预测前列腺癌分级的非侵入性潜在生物标志物:与前列腺活检和根治性前列腺切除术标本的比较。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar;204(3):550-7. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13146.