ESRC Centre for Genomics in Society-Egenis, Department of Sociology and Philosophy, University of Exeter, UK.
Sociol Health Illn. 2012 May;34(4):497-512. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01389.x. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
Clinical applications of biomedical research rely on specialist knowledge provided by professionals who straddle research and therapy, and possess both medical and scientific expertise. To date, this professional group remains under-explored in sociology. Our article presents a case study of clinician-scientists working in stem cell research for heart repair in the UK and Germany who are engaged in double-blind randomised clinical trials using patients' own stem cells. The analysis draws on sociological and medical literature, interviews and ethnographic fieldwork to analyse the experiences and self-rationalisations of a small number of clinician-scientists and the ways in which these professionals portray, explain and justify their role in the wider clinical research environment. We examine our participants' views on the clinical trials they conduct, the challenges they encounter and the ways through which they negotiate a complex disciplinary terrain, and argue that the recent clinical implementation of stem cell research brings clinician-scientists to the fore and provides a renewed platform for their professional legitimisation. The article helps increase our understanding of how randomised clinical trials are involved in consolidating the individual status of actors and the collective standing of clinician-scientists as leaders of change in translational medicine.
生物医学研究的临床应用依赖于跨越研究和治疗领域的专业人员提供的专业知识,这些人员既具备医学专业知识,又具备科学专业知识。迄今为止,社会学领域对这一专业群体的研究仍不够充分。我们的文章以在英国和德国从事心脏修复干细胞研究的临床科研人员为例,他们参与了使用患者自身干细胞的双盲随机临床试验。该分析借鉴了社会学和医学文献、访谈和民族志实地调查,分析了少数临床科研人员的经验和自我合理化,并分析了这些专业人员在更广泛的临床研究环境中描述、解释和证明自己角色的方式。我们研究了参与者对他们进行的临床试验的看法、他们遇到的挑战以及他们协商复杂学科领域的方式,并认为最近干细胞研究的临床实施使临床科研人员脱颖而出,并为他们的专业合法化提供了新的平台。本文有助于增加我们对随机临床试验如何参与巩固参与者个人地位以及临床科研人员作为转化医学变革领导者的集体地位的理解。