Mason N A
College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109.
DICP. 1990 May;24(5):496-505. doi: 10.1177/106002809002400511.
The effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on renal hemodynamics vary widely depending on the preexisting physiologic and pathologic state of the kidneys. Although some studies of ACE inhibitors in primary essential hypertension have demonstrated increases in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and effective renal plasma flow in patients with renal impairment, other studies have not shown these same beneficial results. The difference may involve the choice of ACE inhibitor used in the investigations, but controlled comparison trials are needed to determine whether this is the case. The use of ACE inhibitors in renovascular hypertension remains controversial. ACE inhibition can interfere with the autoregulation of GFR mediated by angiotensin II and may lead to deterioration of renal function, especially in patients with bilateral renal artery stenosis or stenosis of a solitary kidney. Additionally, ACE inhibitors have been shown to cause a decline in GFR in the kidney affected by the stenosis, whether or not clinically apparent renal insufficiency occurs. Although the functional impairment associated with ACE inhibitors in renal artery stenosis has generally been reversible following removal of the drug, the consequences of a long-term reduction in GFR are unknown. Treatment of stable congestive heart failure (CHF) with ACE inhibitors can result in enhancement of GFR and reduction of sodium and fluid retention, thus improving the clinical state. However, in patients with decompensated cardiac failure, renal perfusion pressures may already be at or near the autoregulatory breakpoint and ACE inhibition may cause deterioration of renal function. In general, ACE inhibitors can be used safely in CHF if they are initiated cautiously, with adjustment of ACE inhibitor and diuretic dosages to avoid systemic hypotension and sodium and fluid depletion. In studies comparing the agents, enalapril and lisinopril have both been shown to cause higher incidences of renal function deterioration than has captopril. These findings suggest that the more complete or sustained ACE inhibition seen with the longer-acting agents may be detrimental to renal function in patients with CHF. The use of ACE inhibitors in the treatment of proteinuria is the newest area of research with these agents. At present it appears that ACE inhibitors reduce urinary protein excretion the most effectively in diabetic patients with mild proteinuria and in hypertensive patients with renal insufficiency and proteinuria due to glomerular disorders. More study is needed to determine whether these agents can reduce the rate of renal failure progression and to define the patient populations expected to benefit most.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂对肾脏血流动力学的影响因肾脏先前的生理和病理状态而有很大差异。虽然一些关于ACE抑制剂在原发性高血压中的研究表明,肾功能受损患者的肾小球滤过率(GFR)和有效肾血浆流量有所增加,但其他研究并未显示出这些相同的有益结果。差异可能与研究中使用的ACE抑制剂的选择有关,但需要进行对照比较试验来确定是否如此。ACE抑制剂在肾血管性高血压中的应用仍存在争议。ACE抑制可干扰由血管紧张素II介导的GFR的自身调节,并可能导致肾功能恶化,尤其是在双侧肾动脉狭窄或孤立肾狭窄的患者中。此外,无论临床上是否出现明显的肾功能不全,ACE抑制剂已被证明会导致受狭窄影响的肾脏中GFR下降。虽然肾动脉狭窄中与ACE抑制剂相关的功能损害在停药后通常是可逆的,但GFR长期降低的后果尚不清楚。用ACE抑制剂治疗稳定型充血性心力衰竭(CHF)可导致GFR升高和钠水潴留减少,从而改善临床状况。然而,在失代偿性心力衰竭患者中,肾灌注压可能已经处于或接近自身调节断点,ACE抑制可能导致肾功能恶化。一般来说,如果谨慎使用ACE抑制剂,并调整ACE抑制剂和利尿剂的剂量以避免全身性低血压以及钠和液体耗竭,那么ACE抑制剂可在CHF患者中安全使用。在比较这些药物的研究中,依那普利和赖诺普利导致肾功能恶化的发生率均高于卡托普利。这些发现表明,长效药物所产生的更完全或持续的ACE抑制可能对CHF患者的肾功能有害。ACE抑制剂在蛋白尿治疗中的应用是这些药物最新的研究领域。目前看来,ACE抑制剂在轻度蛋白尿的糖尿病患者以及患有肾功能不全和肾小球疾病所致蛋白尿的高血压患者中,能最有效地减少尿蛋白排泄。需要更多的研究来确定这些药物是否能降低肾衰竭进展的速率,并确定最有可能受益的患者群体。(摘要截选至400字)