Shaw G M, Malcoe L H, Croen L A, Smith D F
March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, Emeryville, CA 94608.
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Jun;131(6):1072-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115599.
This study used data obtained through interview with the mother to determine whether parental occupations from the California birth certificate were representative of maternal occupations during the first trimester of pregnancy or paternal occupations 3 months before conception. For 71% of mothers and 80% of fathers, the occupation on the birth certificate was the same as the occupation elicited from the interview. The sensitivity of the birth certificate for determining whether a mother or father was employed or employed in a particular standard occupational category ranged from 50 to 100%. The bias to the odds ratio associated with a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 80% is presented. The results suggest that the use of birth certificate information on parental occupation to screen for associations with congenital malformations will miss all but very strong associations.
本研究使用通过与母亲访谈获得的数据,以确定加利福尼亚出生证明上的父母职业是否代表怀孕头三个月的母亲职业或受孕前3个月的父亲职业。对于71%的母亲和80%的父亲,出生证明上的职业与访谈中得出的职业相同。出生证明用于确定母亲或父亲是否受雇或受雇于特定标准职业类别的敏感性范围为50%至100%。给出了与75%的敏感性和80%的特异性相关的比值比偏差。结果表明,使用出生证明上父母职业的信息来筛查与先天性畸形的关联,除了非常强的关联外,将遗漏所有其他关联。